Technical Software Development Process in the XML Domain
Background: A Technical Development Process (TDP) is a development process for a particular technology, such as XML, service orientation, object orientation or a programming language. Unlike software development life-cycle processes, TDPs provide concrete and detailed guidance to software engineers working in a particular technology domain. TDPs are currently not well understood in terms of description, modelling and interactions with life-cycle processes. Aim: In this paper, we investigate what are TDPs in the XML domain and how can TDPs be modelled using existing development process modelling notations and tools. Method: We extracted XML specific TDPs from literatures, interviews and internal documentation within software development organizations and conducted systematic verifications and validations. Results: We identify different types of TDPs in the XML domain and propose mechanisms to model TDPs using Software Process Engineering Meta-models (SPEM) in the Eclipse Modelling Framework (EPF). Conclusion: The results demonstrate the feasibility of explicitly identifying and modelling of TDPs in the context of software process modelling and how they are used in software development. The results help further bridge the gap between macro-processes (life-cycle and management-centred processes) and micro-processes (e.g. developer-centred TDPs).
KeywordsSoftware Development Generic Task Eclipse Modelling Framework Agile Method Spiral Model
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Waldt, D.: The extensibility manifesto: A blueprint for XML implementation. In: XML (2005)Google Scholar
- 5.Bhuta, J., Boehm, B., Meyers, S.: Process Elements: Components of Software Process Architectures (2005)Google Scholar
- 6.OMG: Software Process Engineering Metamodel (SPEM) v2.0 Draft (2005)Google Scholar
- 7.Eclipse Process Framework (EPF), http://www.eclipse.org/epf/
- 8.Münch, J.: Transformation-based Creation of Custom-tailored Software Process Models. In: International Workshop on Software Process Simulation and Modeling (ProSim), pp. 50–56. Institution of Electrical Engineers (IEE) (2004)Google Scholar
- 16.Zhu, L., Osterweil, L., Staples, M., Kannengiesser, U., Simidchieva, B.I.: Desiderata for Languages to be Used in the Definition of Reference Business Processes. International Journal of Software and Informatics 1, 37–66 (2008)Google Scholar
- 17.Wise, A.: Little-JIL 1.5 Language Report. Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA (2006)Google Scholar