FPTC: Automated Safety Analysis for Domain-Specific Languages
Critical systems must be shown to be acceptably safe to deploy and use in their environment. The size, scale, heterogeneity, and distributed nature of these increasingly complex systems makes them difficult to verify and analyse. Additionally, domain experts use a variety of languages to model and build their systems. We present an automated safety analysis technique, Fault Propagation and Transformation Analysis, and explain how it can be used for automatically calculating the failure behaviour of an entire system from the failure behaviours of its components. We outline an implementation of the technique in the Epsilon model management platform, allowing it to be used with state-of-the-art model management languages and tools, and making it applicable to a variety of different domain-specific modelling languages.
KeywordsModelling Language Failure Analysis Safety Analysis Object Constraint Language Failure Behaviour
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Conmy, P., Paige, R.: Challenges when using Model-Driven Architecture in the development of safety critical software. In: Proceedings of 4th Workshop on Model-Based Methodologies for Pervasive and Embedded Software. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2007)Google Scholar
- 3.Efftinge, S.: xText reference document (2007), www.eclipse.org/gmt/oaw
- 7.IEC. Analysis techniques for system reliability: Procedures for failure mode and effect analysis. International Standard 812. IEC Geneva (1985)Google Scholar
- 10.Kolovos, D., Paige, R., Polack, F.: On the evolution of OCL for capturing structural constraints in modelling languages. In: Rigorous Object-Oriented Methods. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
- 11.Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F.: Epsilon model management platform (2008), www.eclipse.org/gmt/epsilon
- 13.McDermid, J.A., Nicholson, M., Pumfrey, D.J., Fenelon, P.: Experience with the application of HAZOP to computer-based systems. In: Compass 1995: 10th Annual Conference on Computer Assurance, Gaithersburg, Maryland, pp. 37–48. National Institute of Standards and Technology (1995)Google Scholar
- 15.Wallace, M.: Modular architectural representation and analysis of fault propagation and transformation. In: FESCA 2005. ENTCS. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar