Advertisement

Towards Culturally-Situated Agent Which Can Detect Cultural Differences

  • Heeryon Cho
  • Naomi Yamashita
  • Toru Ishida
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5044)

Abstract

A method to calculate the semantic dissimilarity in two countries’ pictogram interpretations is proposed. Two countries’ pictogram interpretation words are mapped to SUMO classes via WordNet2SUMO. Appropriate concept weights are assigned to SUMO classes using the interpretation ratios. The edges between the two SUMO classes are counted to obtain the path length of the two classes. Three bipartite graphs are generated using the classes and edges to calculate the between-country vs. within-country dissimilarity in pictogram interpretations. Preliminary result showed that human assessment of interpretation dissimilarity does not always correspond to concept-level dissimilarity in the ontology.

Keywords

interpretation cultural difference detection ontology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chaudron, L., Erceau, J., Tessier, C.: Cultural differences? An opportunity for a mutual knowledge enhancement. In: PRICAI 1998 Workshop on Issues in cross-cultural communication: Toward culturally situated agents (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ishida, T.: Communicating culture. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on the Future of AI 21(3), 62–63 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marcus, A.: Icons, symbols, and signs: Visible languages to facilitate communication. Interactions 10(3), 37–43 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kolers, P.A.: Some formal characteristics of pictograms. American Scientist 57, 348–363 (1969)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Niles, I., Pease, A.: Linking lexicons and ontologies: Mapping WordNet to the Suggested Upper Merged Ontology. In: IKE 2003 Proc. of the Int’l. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Engineering (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Niles, I., Pease, A.: Towards a standard upper ontology. In: FOIS 2001 Proc. 2nd Int’l. Conf. on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In: IJCAI 1995 Proc. of the Int’l. Joint Conf. on AI, pp. 448–453 (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rada, R., Mili, H., Bicknell, E., Blettner, M.: Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 19(1), 17–30 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heeryon Cho
    • 1
  • Naomi Yamashita
    • 2
  • Toru Ishida
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social InformaticsKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Media Interaction Principle Open LaboratoryNTT Communication Science LaboratoriesKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations