Developing Knowledge Models for Multi-agent Mediator Systems

  • Cheah Wai Shiang
  • Leon Sterling
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5044)

Abstract

Developing knowledge models for multi agent system is currently ad-hoc. Neither guidelines nor mechanisms nor techniques exist for developing the agent knowledge. This paper presents a conceptual architecture and implementation for a knowledge model for a class of multi-agent mediator systems. They arise from the prototyping of a multi agent system finding an adviser for an international student at an Australian University. The knowledge model development process is based on the quality criteria for knowledge based system of applicability and maintainability, as well as issues required by agents in dealing with knowledge. The process components are described and form the requirements for an agent developer in dealing with the development of agent knowledge from scratch.

Keywords

knowledge model mediator architecture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Luck, M., McBurney, P., Shehory, O., Willmott, S.: Agent Techonology: Computing as Interaction: A Roadmap for Agent-Based Computing, Agentlink (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schreiber, G., Akkermans, H., Anjewierden, A., Hoog, R., Shadbolt, N., Velde, W., Wielinga, B.: Knowledge engineering and management,The CommonKADS methodology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hristozova, M., Sterling, L.: An eXtreme method for developing lightweight ontologies. In: Workshop on Ontologies in Agent Systems, 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent System (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Indgreen, A., Palmer, R., Vanhamme, J., Beverland, M.: Finding and choosing a supervisor. Journal of Marketing Review (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Konstantinos Kotis, G.A.: Human-centered ontology engineering: The HCOME. International Journal of Knowledge and information system (KAIS), 109–131 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chiu, D.K.W., Poon, J.K.M., Lam, W.C.: How ontologies can help in an e-marketplace. In: 13th European Conference on Information systems (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pinto, H.S., Martins, J.P.: Ontologies: How can they be built? Journal of Knoweldge and information system (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu, D.R., Wu, I.C., Yang, K.S.: Task-based K-support system: disseminating and sharing task-relevant knowledge. Journal of expert systems with applications (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lister, K., Sterling, L., Taveter, K.: Reconciling Ontological Differences by Assistant Agents. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Future University, Hakodate, Japan (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Preist, C.: Agent mediated electronic commerce research at Hewlett Packard Labs. Journal of SIGecom Exchange, 18–28 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Annamalai, M., Sterling, L.: Guidelines for constructing reusable domain ontologies. In: AAMAS 2003 Workshop on Ontologies in Agent Systems, Melbourne, Australia (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Benjamins, R., Fensel, D., Pierret-Golbreich, C., Motta, E., Studer, R., Wielinga, B., Rousset, M.C.: Making knowledge engineering technology work. In: Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), Madrid, Spain (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Corcho, O., Fernandez-Lopez, M., Gomez-Perez, A.: Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is the meeting point? Journal of Data and Knowledge Engineering 46(1), 41–64 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cheah Wai Shiang
    • 1
  • Leon Sterling
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Software EngineeringThe Univeristy of MelbourneCarltonAustralia

Personalised recommendations