Reasoning about Norms, Obligations, Time and Agents
Reasoning about norms and time is of central concern to the regulation or control of the behavior of a multiagent system. In this paper we introduce a representation of normative systems that distinguishes between norms and the detached obligations of agents over time, leading to a simple and therefore practical way to reason about norms, obligations, time and agents. We consider the reasoning tasks to determine whether a norm is redundant in a normative system and whether two normative systems are equivalent. In the former case the redundant norm might be removed. In the latter case one norm might be replaced by the other. It is well known that properties concerning iterated or deontic detachment no longer hold when reasoning with multiple agents or with obligations over time. Yet, earlier approaches to reasoning about norms rarely consider the intricacies of time. We show how norms can be used to define the persistence of obligations of agents over time. We illustrate our approach by discussing three ways to relate norms and obligations of agents over time. Also we show how these three ways can be characterized.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Alchourrón, C.E., Makinson, D.: Hierarchies of regulations and their logic. In: Hilpinen, R. (ed.) New Studies in Deontic Logic, pp. 125–148. Reidel (1981)Google Scholar
- 5.Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: An architecture of a normative system. In: Procs. of AAMAS 2006, pp. 229–231. ACM Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
- 6.Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Substantive and procedural norms in normative multiagent systems. Journal of Applied Logic (2008)Google Scholar
- 7.Boella, G., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H. (eds.): Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory. Selected papers from NORMAS 2005 (2006)Google Scholar
- 8.Boella, G., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H. (eds.): Normative Mulit-agent systems, Procs. of NORMAS 2007, Dagstuhl Seminar proceedings 07122 (2007)Google Scholar
- 9.Broersen, J., Brunel, J.: What I fail to do today, I have to do tomorrow: a logical study of the propagation of obligations. In: Proceedings CLIMA VIII. LNCS. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
- 14.Hansen, J., Pigozzi, G., van der Torre, L.: Ten philosophical problems in deontic logic. In: Proceedings of Normative Multi-agent Systems, NORMAS 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
- 17.Jones, A., Sergot, M.: A formal characterisation of institutionalised power. Logic Journal of IGPL (1996)Google Scholar
- 20.Makinson, D.: On a fundamental problem of deontic logic. In: McNamara, P., Prakken, H. (eds.) Norms, Logics and Information Systems. New Studies on Deontic Logic and Computer Science, pp. 29–54. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)Google Scholar
- 28.van Fraassen, B.: Values and the heart’s command. The Journal of Philosophy (1973)Google Scholar