Advertisement

Analysis of the Effects of XLFrames in a Network

  • Dinil Mon Divakaran
  • Eitan Altman
  • Georg Post
  • Ludovic Noirie
  • Pascale Vicat-Blanc Primet
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5550)

Abstract

The phenomenal increase in network capacity to hundreds and thousands of Gbits/s in the core as well as Gbits/s at the access, is soon to witness stupendous amounts of packets that have to be processed and switched at amplifying line rates. Looking into the future, we address the need for the integration of packets of larger size, called XLFrames (XLFs), into the future Internet framework. This paper analyses the effects of introducing XLFs in a network that has both packets and XLFs. We evaluate the gains in terms of processing power and throughput. As we observe that XLFs have an impact on loss rate and fairness, we study how, with minimal efforts at routers while keeping the existing protocols (TCP/UDP, IP), XLFs may integrate in the current scenario.

Keywords

Future Internet Packet size IP network 

References

  1. 1.
    Ye, T.T., Micheli, G.D., Benini, L.: Analysis of power consumption on switch fabrics in network routers. In: DAC 2002: Proc. of the 39th Conf. on Design automation, pp. 524–529 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Telcos demand greener network equipment (2008), http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1847837420080619
  3. 3.
    Bonald, T., Oueslati-Boulahia, S., Roberts, J.: IP traffic and QoS control: the need for a flow-aware architecture. In: World Telecommunications Congress (September 2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feng, W., Balaji, P., Baron, C., Bhuyan, L.N., Panda, D.K.: Performance Characterization of a 10-Gigabit Ethernet TOE. In: HOTI 2005: Proc. of the 13th Symposium on High Perf. Interconnects, pp. 58–63 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Makineni, S., Iyer, R.: Architectural Characterization of TCP/IP Packet Processing on the Pentium®M Microprocessor. In: HPCA 2004, pp. 152–161 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dykstra, P.: Gigabit ethernet jumbo frames and why you should care (1999), http://sd.wareonearth.com/~phil/jumbo.html
  7. 7.
    Mathis, M.: Pushing up the Internet MTU. Internet2/NLANR Joint Techs Meeting, Miami, Florida (March 2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Myri-10G: Myrinet Converges with Ethernet, http://www.myri.com/news/051121/Myricom_SC05_Myri-10G.pdf
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Wang, W.Y.H., Yeo, H.N., Zhu, Y.L., Chong, T.C., Chai, T.Y., Zhou, L., Bitwas, J.: Design and development of Ethernet-based storage area network protocol. Computer Communications 29(9), 1271–1283 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Simitci, H., Malakapalli, C., Gunturu, V.: Evaluation of SCSI over TCP/IP and SCSI over fibre channel connections. In: Hot Interconnects 2001, vol. 9, pp. 87–91 (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salyers, D., Jiang, Y., Striegel, A., Poellabauer, C.: JumboGen: dynamic jumbo frame generation for network performance scalability. SIGCOMM CCR 37(5), 53–64 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Qiao, C., Yoo, M.: Optical burst switching (OBS) - a new paradigm for an optical Internet. J. High Speed Netw. 8(1), 69–84 (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vlachos, K.: Burstification effect on the TCP synchronization and congestion window mechanism. In: BROADNETS, pp. 24–28 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    John, W., Tafvelin, S.: Analysis of Internet backbone traffic and header anomalies observed. In: IMC 2007, pp. 111–116 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Katevenis, M., Passas, G., Simos, D., Papaefstathiou, I., Chrysos, N.: Variable packet size buffered crossbar (CICQ) switches. In: ICC 2004, June 2004, vol. 2, pp. 1090–1096 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chrysos, N., Katevenis, M.: Scheduling in non-blocking buffered three-stage switching fabrics. In: IEEE INFOCOM (April 2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mathis, M., Semke, J., Mahdavi, J.: The macroscopic behavior of the TCP congestion avoidance algorithm. SIGCOMM CCR 27(3), 67–82 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barakat, C., Altman, E.: Bandwidth tradeoff between tcp and link-level fec. Comput. Netw. 39(2), 133–150 (2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dinil Mon Divakaran
    • 1
  • Eitan Altman
    • 2
  • Georg Post
    • 3
  • Ludovic Noirie
    • 3
  • Pascale Vicat-Blanc Primet
    • 1
  1. 1.INRIA / Université de Lyon / ENS Lyon, LIP, ENS LyonLyonFrance
  2. 2.INRIAFrance
  3. 3.Alcatel-Lucent Bell LabsFrance

Personalised recommendations