NETWORKING 2009: NETWORKING 2009 pp 301-312 | Cite as

The Illusion of Being Deterministic – Application-Level Considerations on Delay in 3G HSPA Networks

(Work in Progress)
  • Joachim Fabini
  • Wolfgang Karner
  • Lukas Wallentin
  • Thomas Baumgartner
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5550)

Abstract

The delay experienced by mobile applications in HSPA networks depends to a large extent on highly dynamical global context like, e.g., cell load or algorithms and thresholds governing radio resource scheduling, and on local context like, e.g., user-generated load or load history. These complex uncertainty factors are outside of an application’s sphere of influence and result in applications perceiving HSPA link behavior as non-deterministic and non-reproducible.

This paper analyzes accurate round-trip and one-way delay measurement results for three public HSPA networks to demonstrate the high degree of network non-determinism which mobile applications are likely to encounter in practice, particularly significant payload-dependence and halved delay on slightly increased user-generated link load. We argue that current HSPA radio link schedulers, relying on instantaneous user load as decision criterion for channel capacity allocation, neglect real-time application requirements. Cross-layer optimization is one solution which enables deterministic scheduler decisions based on application requirements.

Keywords

3G One-way Delay HSPA Measurements User Experience 

References

  1. 1.
    Ball, C., Masseroni, C., Trivisonno, R.: Introducing 3G like conversational services in GERAN packet data networks. In: IEEE 61st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2005), Stockholm, Sweden, May 2005, pp. 2186–2191 (Spring 2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vacirca, F., Ricciato, F., Pilz, R.: Large-scale RTT measurements from an operational UMTS/GPRS network. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Wireless Internet (WICON 2005), Budpest, Hungary, July 2005, pp. 190–197 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ricciato, F.: Traffic monitoring and analysis for the optimization of a 3G network. IEEE Wireless Communications 13(6), 42–49 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ricciato, F., Hasenleithner, E., Romirer-Maierhofer, P.: Traffic analysis at short time-scales: an empirical case study from a 3G cellular network. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management 5(1), 11–21 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reichl, P., Jordan, N., Fabini, J., et al.: Wireless Inter-System Quality-of-Service: A Practical Performance Analysis of 3G and Beyond. In: Kommunikation in Verteilten Systemen (KiVS 2005), Kaiserslautern, Germany, March 2005, pp. 230–241 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fabini, J., Reichl, P., Egger, C., et al.: Generic Access Network Emulation for NGN Testbeds. In: 4th International Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities (TridentCom 2008), Innsbruck, Austria, March 2008, p. 10 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fabini, J., Reichl, P., Poropatich, A.: Measurement-Based Modeling of NGN Access Networks from an Application Perspective. In: Proceedings of the 14th GI/ITG Conference on Measurement, Modeling, and Evaluation of Computer and Communication Systems (MMB 2008), Dortmund, Germany, April 2008, pp. 45–59 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fabini, J., Reichl, P., Poropatich, A.: A Generic Approach to Access Network Modeling for Next Generation Network Applications. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Networking and Services (ICNS 2008), Gosier, Guadeloupe, March 2008, pp. 254–260 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA: TCPDump Monitoring Tool (December 2007), http://www.tcpdump.org/
  10. 10.
    3GPP: 3rd Generation Partnership Project: 3GPP TS 25.321, Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol spec., version 6.15.0 (March 2008), http://www.3gpp.org/
  11. 11.
    National Laboratory for Applied Network Research (NLANR): IPerf Performance Measurement Tool (December 2007), http://dast.nlanr.net/Projects/Iperf/
  12. 12.
    Price, R., Bormann, C., Christofferson, J., et al.: IETF standards track RFC 3320: Signaling Compression (SigComp) (January 2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joachim Fabini
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Karner
    • 2
  • Lukas Wallentin
    • 1
  • Thomas Baumgartner
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Broadband CommunicationsVienna University of TechnologyWienAustria
  2. 2.Mobilkom Austria AGWienAustria

Personalised recommendations