Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics pp 455-468 | Cite as
Development of Theory and Practice in Ergonomics
The author had long been thinking about writing this article. In the USSR, and subsequently in the post-Soviet period, one of the factors limiting the development of ergonomics was a misunderstanding of its core by overwhelming majority of engineers, designers, developers and technologists. In those cases where they had begun to realize its importance and then learned this discipline, previously unknown to them, I encountered a resistance to incorporating its principles and data in engineering and design activities. This was substantiated by the fact that ergonomic statements had often been formulated only in a qualitative form, and not in a quantitative one.
Keywords
Information Model Chernobyl Accident Industrial Design Apply Ergonomics Human WorkPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Bekhterev V (1921) Rational Utilisation of Human Energy in Work. In: The Works of the first All-Russian Initiative Conference on Scientific Organisation of Labour and Production. 1, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Bekhterev V (1922) What are the Results of the Initiative Conference on Scientific Organisation of Labour. In: Labour Studies. Gosizdat, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Bernstein NA (1930) Contemporary Biomechanics and Labour Protection. In: Hygiene, Safety and Pathology of Labour, 2 (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Dobrotvorsky NM (1930) Airmanship, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Dobrotvorsky NM (1937) Cockpit Comfort as a Means of Higher Combat Efficiency. In: Vestnik Vozdushnogo Flota, 1 (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Gellerstein SG (1932) The problems of Psychotechnics on the Threshhold of the Second Five-Year Plan. In: Sovetskaya psikhotekhnika 1–2 (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Gvishiani DM (1972) Organisation and Management. Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Luczak H, Beitz W, Springer I, Langner T (1991) Friction and frustrations in creative-informatory work with computer aided design – CAD-systems. Human aspects in computing: Design and use of Interactive Systems and Work with Terminals. Ed. by Bullinger HI. Elsevier Scince Publishers B.V.Google Scholar
- Munipov VM (1978) Applied Ergonomics in the USSR. In: Applied Ergonomics, vol. 9, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Munipov VM (1979) Ergonomics as a Factor in Social and Economic Development. In: Ergonomics, vol. 22, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Munipov VM (1981) Main Results of and Prospects for Scientific and Technological Cooperation of CMEA Countries in Ergonomics and Industrial Design Problems. VNIITE, Coordination Center, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Munipov VM (1982) The State and Development Trends of Ergonomics (A Review of Materials Published Abroad). VNIITE, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Munipov VM, Danilyak VI, Oshe VK (1982) Standartisation, Products Quality and Ergonomics. Standards Publishers (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Munipov V (1991) Human engineering analysis of Chernobyl Accident. In: Towards human work: Solutions to Problems in Occupational Health and Safety. Ed. by Kumashiro M, Megan ED. Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Munipov V (1992) Chernobyl Operators: Criminals or Victim? In: Applied Ergonomics, vol. 23, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Munipov VM, Zinchenko VP (2001) Human-Centered Ergonomic Design of Tool, Technology, Hardware, Software and Environment. Logos, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Munipov VM (2006) I.N. Shpielrein, L.S. Vygotsky and S.G. Gellerstein, Founders of Scientific School of Industrial Psychotechnics in the USSR. In: International scientific journal “Cultural-Historical Psychology”. 4 (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Myasischev VN (1921) The Principles of the Organisation of Scientific Study of Labour. In: The Works of the First All-Russian Initiative Conference on Scientific Organisation of Labour and Production, v.5. Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
- N N (1921) Works of the First All-Russian Initiative Conference on Scientific Organisation of Labour and Production, v. 5. Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
- N N (1925) Work Study Method. Ed. by Spielrein IN. NKRKI Publishers, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
- N N (1967) Engineering Psychology Requirements for Control Systems. VNIITE, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
- N N (1970–1986) Works of VNIITE. Ergonomics Series 1–32. VNIITE, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
- N N (1981) The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology. Ed. by Wertsch J V. M. E. Sharpe Inc., New York.Google Scholar
- N N (1983a) Ergonomics: Principles and Recommendations, A Manual. VNIITE, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
- N N (1983b) The History of Soviet Psychology of Labour. Texts (1920s–1930s). State University, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
- N N (1992) Work with Displays Units. In: WWDU’92 Berlin 1–4 September. Ed. by Luczak H, Cakir AE. Technische Universitat, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Springer I, Langner T, Luczak H, Betz W (1991) Experimental Comparison of CAD Systems by Stressors Variables. In: International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 3, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vygotsky LS (1930) Problems of Higher Mental Functions in the System of Psychotechnics Research. In: Psychotechnics and Psychophysiology of Labour, 5. Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Zinchenko VP, Gordon VM, Munipov VM (1973–1974) Study of Visual Thinking. In: Soviet Psychology, vol. XII, 2.Google Scholar
- Zinchenko VP, Munipov VM (1976) Man and Modern Production. In: Social Sciences, 4. USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow.Google Scholar
- Zinchenko VP, Munipov VM (1989) Fundamentals of Ergonomics. Progress, Moscow.Google Scholar