A Requirement Engineering Framework for Electronic Data Sharing of Health Care Data Between Organizations
Health care is increasingly provided to citizens by a network of collaboration that includes multiple providers and locations. Typically, that collaboration is on an ad-hoc basis via phone calls, faxes, and paper based documentation. Internet and wireless technologies provide an opportunity to improve this situation via electronic data sharing. These new technologies make possible new ways of working and collaboration but it can be difficult for health care organizations to understand how to use the new technologies while still ensuring that their policies and objectives are being met. It is also important to have a systematic approach to validate that e-health processes deliver the performance improvements that are expected. Using a case study of a palliative care patient receiving home care from a team of collaborating health organizations, we introduce a framework based on requirements engineering. Key concerns and objectives are identified and modeled (privacy, security, quality of care, and timeliness of service). And, then, proposed business processes which use new technologies are modeled in terms of these concerns and objectives to assess their impact and ensure that electronic data sharing is well regulated.
KeywordsRequirements Engineering User Requirements Notation health care data sharing privacy quality of care
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Kuziemsky, C.: Information Technology in Palliative Care, Working Paper, Action for Health Project. University of Victoria (July 2004), http://www.sfu.ca/act4hlth/pub/working/IT%20Palliative.pdf (accessed, February 2009)
- 5.PHIPA, Government of Ontario: Personal Health Information Protection Act (2004), http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_04p03_e.htm (accessed, January 2009)
- 6.PIPEDA, Government of Canada, Health Information Custodians in the Province of Ontario Exemption Order (2005), http://canadagazette.gc.ca/partII/2005/20051214/html/sor399-e.html (accessed January, 2009)
- 7.European Union, Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications. European Parliament, Brussels, Belgium, (2002), http://europa.eu/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2002/l_201/l_20120020731en00370047.pdf (accessed, January 2009)
- 8.HIPPA, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Medical Privacy - National Standards to Protect the Privacy of Personal Health Information (1996), http://aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp/pl104191.htm (accessed, January 2009)
- 9.Darimont, R., Lemoine, M.: Goal-oriented Analysis of Regulations. In: International Workshop on Regulations Modelling and their Verification & Validation (REMO2V 2006). Presses Universitaires de Namur, Luxemburg (2006)Google Scholar
- 10.He, Q., Otto, P., Ant´on, A.I., Jones, L.: Ensuring compliance between policies, requirements and software design: A case study. In: IWIA 2006: Proc. Fourth IEEE Int. Workshop on Information Assurance, Washington, USA, pp. 79–92. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
- 13.ITU-T, Recommendation Z.150 (02/03): User Requirements Notation (URN) – Language requirements and framework, Geneva, Switzerland, 200337 Google Scholar
- 16.Mussbacher, G.: Evolving Use Case Maps as a Scenario and Workflow Description Language. In: 10th Workshop of Requirement Engineering (WER 2007), Toronto, Canada, May 2007, pp. 56–67 (2007)Google Scholar
- 18.Kealey, J., Kim, Y., Amyot, D., Mussbacher, G.: Integrating an Eclipse-Based Scenario Modeling Environment with a Requirements Management System. In: 2006 IEEE Canadian Conf. on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE 2006), Ottawa, Canada, pp. 2432–2435 (2006)Google Scholar
- 19.Cummings, I.: The interdisciplinary team. In: Dovle, D., Hanks, C.W.C., MacDonald, N. (eds.) Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine, 2nd edn., pp. 19–30. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)Google Scholar
- 20.Kuziemsky, C.: Palliative Healthcare Patient Scenario v1.0 - July 2008 (2008)Google Scholar