Belief-Based Stability in Non-transferable Utility Coalition Formation with Uncertainty

  • Chi-Kong Chan
  • Ho-fung Leung
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 199)

Abstract

Coalition stability is an important concept in coalition formation. One common assumption in many stability criteria in non-transferable utility games is that the preference of each agent is publicly known so that a coalition is said to be stable if there is no objections by any sub-group of agents according to the publicly known preferences. However, in many software agent applications, this assumption is not true. Instead, agents are modeled as individuals with private belief and decisions are made according to those beliefs instead of common knowledge. There are two types of uncertainty here. First, uncertainty in beliefs regarding the environment means that agents are also uncertain about their preference. Second, an agent’s actions can be influenced by his belief regarding other agents’ preferences. Such uncertainties have impacts on the coalition’s stability which is not reflected in the current stability criteria. In this paper, we extend the classic stability concept of the core by proposing new belief based stability criteria under uncertainty, and illustrate how the new concept can be used to analyze the stability of a new type of belief-based coalition formation game.

Keywords

Coalition Formation Uncertainty Private Beliefs NTU Games 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gerber, A.: Coalition Formation in General NTU Games. Review of Economic Design 5, 149–175 (2000)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sandholm, T.: Distributed rational decision making. In: Weiss, G. (ed.) Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ketchpel, S.: Forming coalitions in the face of uncertain rewards. In: Proceedings of National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1994), pp. 414–419 (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gillies, D.B.: Solutions to general non-zero-sum games. In: Tucker, A.W., Luce, R.D. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games, vol. IV. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1959)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chalkiadakis, G., Boutilier, C.: Bayesian reinforcement learning for coalition formation under uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 1090–1097 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chalkiadakis, G., Boutilier, C.: Coalition Formation under Uncertainty: Bargaining Equilibria and the Bayesian Core Stability Concept. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 1090–1097 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suijs, J., Borm, P., De Waegenaere, A., Tijs, S.: Cooperative Games with Stochastic Payoffs. European Journal of Operational Research 133 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chi-Kong Chan
    • 1
  • Ho-fung Leung
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong Kong 

Personalised recommendations