Advertisement

Effects of Different Antenna Phase Center Models on GPS-Derived Reference Frames

  • P. Steigenberger
  • M. Rothacher
  • R. Schmid
  • P. Steigenberger
  • A. Rülke
  • M. Fritsche
  • R. Dietrich
  • V. Tesmer
Chapter
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 134)

Abstract

In GPS week 1400, the International GNSS Service (IGS) switched from a relative antenna phase center model (APCM) for receiver antennas only to an absolute model including receiver and satellite antenna corrections. At the same time the International Terrestrial Reference Frame 2005 (ITRF2005) was adopted. These changes had a significant influence on the terrestrial reference frame (TRF). In order to study the influence of different APCMs on GPS-derived TRFs, four TRF solutions have been computed from 11 years of homogeneously reprocessed GPS data. The processing strategy for the four solutions is completely identical except for the APCM applied. The following models have been used: (1) the relative model IGS01 used by the IGS till GPS week 1400, (2) the new absolute IGS model IGS05 including radome calibrations, (3) IGS05 ignoring the radome calibrations for the receiver antennas, and (4) IGS05 including azimuth-dependent satellite antenna phase center variations (PCVs). Station coordinates and velocities have been estimated simultaneously with daily pole coordinates. Consistent time series of station coordinates have been generated using the corresponding reference frames for datum definition. This paper compares the station coordinates and velocities as well as the station coordinate time series arising from the four different reference frames.

Keywords

Terrestrial reference frame antenna phase center model Global Positioning System 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dow J, Neilan R, Gendt G (2005), The International GPS Service: Celebrating the 10th anniversary and looking to the next decade, Advances in Space Research, 36(3), pp. 320–326, DOI 10.1016/j.asr.2005.05.125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fritsche M, Dietrich R, Knöfel C, Rülke A, Vey S, Rothacher M, Steigenberger P (2005) Impact of higher-order ionospheric terms on GPS estimates. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L23311, DOI 10.1029/2005GL024342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ge M, Gendt G, Dick G, Zhang FP, Reigber C (2005) Impact of GPS satellite antenna offsets on scale changes in global network solutions. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L06310, DOI 10. 1029/2004GL022224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mader GL (1999) GPS antenna calibration at the National Geodetic Survey. GPS Solutions, 3(1), pp. 50–58, DOI 10.1007/PL00012780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Menge F, Seeber G, Völksen C, Wübbena G, Schmitz M (1998) Results of absolute field calibration of GPS antenna PCV. In: Proceedings of ION GPS98, Nashville, TN, pp. 31–38Google Scholar
  6. Niell A (2000) Improved atmospheric mapping functions for VLBI and GPS. Earth Planets Space, 52(10), pp. 699–702Google Scholar
  7. Ray J, Dong D, Altamimi Z (2004) IGS reference frames: status and future improvements. GPS Solutions, 8(4), pp. 251–266, DOI 10.1007/ s10291-004-0110-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schmid R, Rothacher M, Thaller D, Steigenberger P (2005) Absolute phase center corrections of satellite and receiver antennas: Impact on global GPS solutions and estimation of azimuthal phase center variations of the satellite antenna. GPS Solutions, 9(4), pp. 283–293, DOI 10.1007/ s10291-005-0134-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schmid R, Steigenberger P, Gendt G, Ge M, Rothacher M (2007) Generation of a consistent absolute phase center correction model for GPS receiver and satellite antennas. Journal of Geodesy, 81(12), pp. 781–798, DOI 10.1007/ s00190-007-0148-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Steigenberger P, Rothacher M, Dietrich R, Fritsche M, Rülke A, Vey S (2006) Reprocessing of a global GPS network. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, B05402, DOI 10.1029/2005JB003747CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Steigenberger
    • 1
  • M. Rothacher
    • 1
  • R. Schmid
    • 2
  • P. Steigenberger
    • 2
  • A. Rülke
    • 3
  • M. Fritsche
    • 3
  • R. Dietrich
    • 3
  • V. Tesmer
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Geodesy and Remote SensingGeoForschungsZentrum PotsdamPotsdamGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie, Technische Universität MünchenMünchenGermany
  3. 3.Institut für Planetare Geodäsie, Technische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
  4. 4.Deutsches Geodätisches ForschungsinstitutMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations