Securing the Dissemination of Emergency Response Data with an Integrated Hardware-Software Architecture

  • Timothy E. Levin
  • Jeffrey S. Dwoskin
  • Ganesha Bhaskara
  • Thuy D. Nguyen
  • Paul C. Clark
  • Ruby B. Lee
  • Cynthia E. Irvine
  • Terry V. Benzel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5471)

Abstract

During many crises, access to sensitive emergency-support information is required to save lives and property. For example, for effective evacuations first responders need the names and addresses of non-ambulatory residents. Yet, currently, access to such information may not be possible because government policy makers and third-party data providers lack confidence that today’s IT systems will protect their data. Our approach to the management of emergency information provides first responders with temporary, transient access to sensitive information, and ensures that the information is revoked after the emergency. The following contributions are presented: a systematic analysis of the basic forms of trusted communication supported by the architecture; a comprehensive method for secure, distributed emergency state management; a method to allow a userspace application to securely display data; a multifaceted system analysis of the confinement of emergency information and the secure and complete revocation of access to that information at the closure of an emergency.

Keywords

Information Assurance Computer Security Policy Enforcement Secret Protection (SP) Transient Trust Emergency Response 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Johns Hopkins University, National center for study of preparedness and catastrophic event response. Technical Report, http://www.pacercenter.org
  2. 2.
    IAD: U.S. Government Protection Profile for Separation Kernels in Environments Requiring High Robustness. Version 1.021 edn. National Information Assurance Partnership (March 2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Levin, T.E., Irvine, C.E., Weissman, C., Nguyen, T.D.: Analysis of three multilevel security architectures. In: Proceedings 1st Computer Security Architecture Workshop, Fairfax, VA, 37–46 (November 2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dwoskin, J.S., Lee, R.B.: Hardware-rooted trust for secure key management and transient trust. In: Proc. of 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security, pp. 389–400. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sterne, D.F.: On the buzzword “security policy”. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Research on Security and Privacy, Oakland, CA, pp. 219–230. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CCMB: Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 2: Security functional components. 3.1 revision 1 edn. Number CCMB-2006-09-001 in Criteria. Common Criteria Maintenance Board (September 2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kent, S., Atkinson, R.: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol. Number 4301 in Request for Comments. The Internet Society (December 2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Badra, M., Hajjeh, I.: Key-exchange authentication using shared secrets. Computer 39(3), 58–66 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dolev, D., Yao, A.C.: On the security of public key protocols. In: Proc. Of 22Th annual symposium on foundations of computer science. IEEE Computer Society press, Los Alamitos (1981)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith, S., Weingart, S.: Building a high-performance, programmable secure coprocessor. Computer Networks 31, 831–860 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trusted Computing Group: TCG specification architecture overview. Technical Report Rev 1.2, Trusted Computing Group (April 28, 2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    IBM: Ibm extends enhanced data security to consumer electronics products. Technical Report, http://www.cio.com/article/20075/IBM_to_Offer_Chip_Based_Encryption_for_PCs_PDAs
  13. 13.
    Alkassar, A., Scheibel, M., Sadeghi, A.R., Stüble, C., Winandy, M.: Security architecture for device encryption and vpn. In: Proc. of Information Security Solution Europe (ISSE) (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sadeghi, A.R., Stüble, C., Pohlmann, N.: European Multilateral Secure Computing Base - Open Trusted Computing for You and Me. In: Datenschutz und Datensicherheit (DUD), pp. 548–554. Vieweg Verlag (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alves-Foss, J., Taylor, C., Oman, P.: A multi-layered approach to security in high assurance systems. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI (January 2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vanfleet, W.M., Beckwith, R.W., Calloni, B., Luke, J.A., Taylor, C., Uchenick, G.: Mils: Architecture for high assurance embedded computing. CrossTalk 18(8), 12–16 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gleeson, B., Lin, A., Heinanen, J., Armitage, G., Malis, A.: A framework for ip based virtual private networks. Technical Report RFC 2764, IETF (February 2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bell, D.E., Fiske, R.S., Gasser, M., Tasker, P.S.: Secure on-line processing technology - final report. Technical Report ESD–TR-74–186, The MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA (August 1974)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Solutions, G.G.: XTS-400, STOP 6.0, User’s Manual. Getronics Government Solutions, LLC, Herndon, VA. Xtdoc0005-01 edn. (August 2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    National Computer Security Center: Final Evaluation Report of Gemini Computers, Incorporated Gemini Trusted Network Processor, Version 1.01 (June 28, 1995)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gligor, V., Burch, E., Chandersekaran, G., Chapman, R., Dotterer, L., Hecht, M., Jiang, W., Luckenbaugh, G., Vasudevan, N.: On the design and implementation of secure xenix workstations. In: IEEE Symposium on Security, pp. 102–117 (May 1986)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bickel, R., Cook, M., Haney, J., Kerr, M., Parker, T.: Guide to Securing Microsoft Windows XP. National Security Agency (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Burger, W., et al.: Remote trusted path mechanism for telnet. Number 07/150966 in Patent. International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, NY (May 1989)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xen User’s Manual. Xen v3.0 edn. University of Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barham, P., et al.: Xen and the art of virtualization. In: Proc. Nineteenth ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles, pp. 164–177 (2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Epstein, J., et al.: Evolution of a trusted b3 window system prototype. In: Proc. of the 1992 IEEE Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy (May 1992)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Anderson, M., North, C., Griffin, J., Milner, R., Yesberg, J., Yiu, K.: Starlight: Interactive link. In: Proceedings 12th Computer Security Applications Conference, San Diego, CA (December 1996)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Epstein, J.: Fifteen years after tx: A look back at high assurance multi-level secure windowing. In: Computer Security Applications Conference. ACSAC 22nd Annual, pp. 301–320 (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    National Security Agency. Executive Summary of the End-to-End IA Component of the GIG Integrated Architecture. Version 1.0 edn. National Security Agency Information Assurance Directorate (April 2005)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wolfowitz, P.: Global Information Grid (GIG) Overarching Policy, directive number 8100.1. U.S. Department of Defense (September 2002)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    OASIS Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL) Distribution Element. v1.0 edn, http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/EDXL-DE/V1.0

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy E. Levin
    • 1
  • Jeffrey S. Dwoskin
    • 2
  • Ganesha Bhaskara
    • 3
  • Thuy D. Nguyen
    • 1
  • Paul C. Clark
    • 1
  • Ruby B. Lee
    • 2
  • Cynthia E. Irvine
    • 1
  • Terry V. Benzel
    • 3
  1. 1.Naval Postgraduate SchoolMontereyUSA
  2. 2.Princeton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  3. 3.USC Information Sciences InstituteMarina Del ReyUSA

Personalised recommendations