Location Concepts for the Web

Chapter

Abstract

The concept of location has become very popular in many applications on the Web, in particular for those which aim at connecting the real world with resources on the Web. However, the Web as it is today has no overall location concept, which means that applications have to introduce their own location concepts and have done so in incompatible ways. On the other hand, there are a number of interfaces and techniques that make location information available to networked devices. By turning the Web into a location-aware Web location-oriented applications get better support for their location concepts on the Web, and the Web becomes an information system where location-related information can be more easily shared across different applications and application areas. This chapter describes a location concept for the Web supporting different location types and its embedding into some of the Web’s core technologies.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ben Adida, Mark Birbeck, Shane McCarron, and Steven Pemberton. RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing — A Collection of Attributes and Processing Rules for Extending XHTML to Support RDF. World Wide Web Consortium, Recommendation REC-rdfa-syntax-20081014, October 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Open Mobile Alliance, editor.Mobile Location Protocol. Open Mobile Alliance, 6 2008.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mary Barnes, James Winterbottom, Martin Thomson, and Barbara Stark. HTTP Enabled Location Delivery (HELD). Internet Draft draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-10, October 2008.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dave Beckett. RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised). World Wide Web Consortium, Recommendation REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210, February 2004.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tim Berners-Lee, Roy Thomas Fielding, and Larry Masinter. Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax. Internet RFC 3986, January 2005.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ralf Bill, Clemens Cap, Martin Kofahl, and Thomas Mundt. Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Mobile Environments – A Review and Some Investigations on WLAN-Positioning.Geographic Information Sciences, 10(2):91–98, 2004.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tim Bray, Dave Hollander, Andrew Layman, and Richard Tobin. Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Second Edition). World Wide Web Consortium, Recommendation REC-xml-names-20060816, August 2006.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tim Bray, Jean Paoli, C. Michael Sperberg-McQueen, Eve Maler, and Francois Yergeau. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition). World Wide Web Consortium, Recommendation REC-xml-20060816, August 2006.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andrew Daviel and Felix A. Kägi. Geographic Registration of HTML Documents. Internet Draft draft-daviel-html-geo-tag-08, October 2007.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andrew Daviel, Felix A. Kägi, and Martin Kofahl. Geographic Extensions for HTTP Transactions. Internet Draft draft-daviel-http-geo-header-05, December 2007.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roy Thomas Fielding, Jim Gettys, Jeffrey C. Mogul, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, Larry Masinter, Paul J. Leach, and Tim Berners-Lee. Hypertext Transfer Protocol — HTTP/1.1. Internet RFC 2616, June 1999.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roy Thomas Fielding and Richard N. Taylor. Principled Design of the Modern Web Architecture.ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 2(2):115–150, May 2002.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Inc. Google. Gears Geolocation API, July 2008.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adam Greenfield.Everyware: The Dawning Age of Ubiquitous Computing. New Riders, Indianapolis, Indiana, March 2006.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amir Haghighat, Cristina Videira Lopes, Tony Givargis, and Atri Mandal. Location-Aware Web System. InProceedings of the Workshop on Building Software for Pervasive Computing at OOPSLA’04, Vancouver, Canada, October 2004.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Uwe Hansmann, Lothar Merk, Martin S. Nicklous, and Thomas Stober.Pervasive Computing: The Mobile World. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition, August 2003.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paul E. Hoffman, Larry Masinter, and Jamie Zawinski. The mailto URL scheme. Internet RFC 2368, June 1998.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Google Inc. Gears GeolocationAPI, August 2008.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    NTT DoCoMo Inc. Information on i-mode Technical Topics – GPS, November 2007.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    International Organization for Standardization. Codes for the Representation of Names of Countries and their Subdivisions. ISO 3166, November 2001.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    ISO. Geographic information – Spatial Schema. ISO Standard 19107, May 2003.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ian Jacobs and Norman Walsh. Architecture of the World Wide Web, Volume One. World Wide Web Consortium, Recommendation REC-webarch-20041215, December 2004.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tim Kindberg and Sandro Hawke. The ‘tag’ URI Scheme. Internet RFC 4151, October 2005.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Frank G. Lemoine, Steve C. Kenyon, John K. Factor, Ronald G. Trimmer, Nikolaos K. Pavlis, Douglas S. Chinn, Christopher M. Cox, Steven M. Klosko, Scott B. Luthcke, Mark H. Torrence, Yan Ming Wang, Ronald G. Williamson, Erricos C. Pavlis, Richard H. Rapp, T. Rob Olson. The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and the NIMA Geopotential Model EGM96. NASA/TP-1998-206861, July 1998.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marwa Mabrouk.OpenGIS Location Services (OpenLS): Core Services. Open Geospatial Consortium Inc., 05 2005.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alexander Mayrhofer and Christian Spanring. A Uniform Resource Identifier for Geographic Locations (‘geo’ URI). Internet Draft draft-mayrhofer-geopriv-geo-uri-00, May 2008.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    National Imagery and Mapping Agency. Department of Defense World Geodetic System 1984. NIMA TR8350.2, Third Edition, January 2000.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mark Nottingham and Robert Sayre. The Atom Syndication Format. Internet RFC 4287, December 2005.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Open Geospatial Consortium. An Introduction to GeoRSS: A Standards Based Approach for Geo-enabling RSS feeds. OGC 06-050r3, July 2006.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Steven Pemberton. XHTML 1.0: The Extensible HyperText Markup Language (Second Edition). World Wide Web Consortium, Recommendation REC-xhtml1-20020801, August 2002.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jon Peterson. A Presence-Based GEOPRIV Location Object Format. Internet RFC 4119, December 2005.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    James M. Polk, John Schnizlein, and Marc Linsner. Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Option for Coordinate-Based Location Configuration Information. Internet RFC 3825, July 2004.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Andrei Popescu. Geolocation API Specification (Draft), June 2008.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dave Raggett, Arnaud Le Hors, and Ian Jacobs. HTML 4.01 Specification. World Wide Web Consortium, Recommendation REC-html401-19991224, December 1999.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Joshua Schachter and Ask Bjrn Hansen. The GeoURL ICBM Address Server.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    H. Schulzrinne. Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses Configuration Information, November 2006.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Martin Thomson and James Winterbottom. Discovering the Local Location Information Server (LIS). Internet Draft draft-ietf-geopriv-lis-discovery-04, October 2008.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    United States Code. Wireless Communications and Public Safety Act of 1999 (911 Act). Pub. L. No. 106-81, 113 Stat. 1286, October 1999.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    WAP Forum. Wireless Application Protocol — Architecture Specification. WAP-210-WAPArch-20010712, July 2001.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stuart L. Weibel, John A. Kunze, Carl Lagoze, and Misha Wolf. Dublin Core Metadata for Resource Discovery. Internet RFC 2413, September 1998.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Erik Wilde. The Plain Web. InProceedings of the First International Workshop on Understanding Web Evolution (WebEvolve2008), pages 79–83, Beijing, China, April 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University RostockGeodesy and GeoinformaticsRostockGermany
  2. 2.School of Information, UC BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations