A Hybrid Reputation Model Based on the Use of Organizations
In this paper we present a hybrid reputation model focused on organizational structures that attempts to solve problems associated with both centralized and decentralized reputation models. Agents in our approach are able not only to evaluate the behavior of others and store reputations values but also to send such information to a centralized mechanism and ask for reputations to this one and to other agents. The main objective of our approach is to allow agents to reason about the reputation values that they receive. Therefore, together with the reputation values, agents store and send information about norms violated and fulfilled and about the facts that contributed to such behavior. Furthermore, this model provides two different types of reputations, as service provider that is related to the behavior of an agent while providing a service to other agents and as reputation source that is related to the behavior of an agent while providing reputation of others.
KeywordsIndividual Norm Multiagent System Centralize Mechanism Organizational Norm Norm Violation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Abdul-Rahman, A., Hailes, S.: Supporting trust in virtual communities. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 6, pp. 293–301 (2000)Google Scholar
- 2.Amazon (2008), http://www.amazon.com
- 3.eBay (2008), http://www.ebay.com
- 4.Grandison, T., Sloman, M.: A survey of trust in internet applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 3(4) (2000)Google Scholar
- 6.Hermoso, R., Billhardt, H., Ossowski, S.: Integrating trust in virtual organisations. In: Noriega, P., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Boella, G., Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Fornara, N., Matson, E. (eds.) COIN 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4386, pp. 17–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
- 7.Huynh, T., Jennings, N., Shadbolt, N.: Fire: An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pp. 18–22 (2004)Google Scholar
- 9.Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of First International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 475–482 (2002)Google Scholar
- 14.López y López, F.: Social power and norms: Impact on agent behavior. PhD thesis, Univ. of Southampton, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Department of Electronics and Computer Science (2003)Google Scholar
- 16.Yu, B., Singh, M.: An evidential model of distributed reputation management. In: Proceedings of First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 1, pp. 294–301 (2002)Google Scholar