Mobile Forensics: An Introduction from Indian Law Enforcement Perspective

  • Rizwan Ahmed
  • Rajiv V. Dharaskar
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 31)


Mobile phone proliferation in our societies is on the increase. Advances in semiconductor technologies related to mobile phones and the increase of computing power of mobile phones led to an increase of functionality of mobile phones while keeping the size of such devices small enough to fit in a pocket. This led mobile phones to become portable data carriers. This in turn increased the potential for data stored on mobile phone handsets to be used as evidence in civil or criminal cases. This paper examines the nature of some of the newer pieces of information that can become potential evidence on mobile phones. It also highlights some of the weaknesses of mobile forensic toolkits and procedures. Finally, the paper shows the need for more in depth examination of mobile phone evidence.


Mobile Forensics Mobile Phone evidence Mobile Forensics toolkits Digital device Forensics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Canalys. Smart mobile device shipments hit 118 million in 2007, up 53% on 2006 (2007),
  3. 3.
    Aljazeera. Phone Dealers in al-Hariri Probe Net (2005),
  4. 4.
    Westtek. ClearVue Suite (2008),
  5. 5.
    Manfrediz, A.: IDC Press Release. IDC Finds More of the World’s Population Connecting to the Internet in New Ways and Embracing Web 2.0 Activities (2008),
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Ducell (2008),
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Ayers, R., Jansen, W., Cilleros, N., Daniellou, R.: Cell Phone Forensic Tools: An Overview and Analysis (2007),
  10. 10.
    Carrier, B.D.: Risks of Live Digital Forensic Analysis. Communications of the ACM 49(2), 56–61 (2006), CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jansen, W., Ayers, R.: Guidelines on PDA Forensics (2004),
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Jansen, W., Ayers, R.: Guidelines on Cell Phone Forensics (2006),
  14. 14.
    Zheng, P., Ni, L.M.: The Rise of the Smart Phone. IEEE Distributed Systems Online, 7(3), art. no. 0603-o3003 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Espiner, T.: Mobile Phone Forensics ’Hole’ Reported (2006),,1000000091,39277347,00.htm
  16. 16.
    McCarthy, P.: Forensic Analysis of Mobile Phones. Unpublished Bachelor of Computer and Information Science (Honours) Degree, University of South Australia, Adelaide (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jansen, W.: Mobile Device Forensic Software Tools. In: Techno Forensics 2005, Gaithersburg, MD, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Ghosh, A.: Guidelines for the Management of IT Evidence (2004),
  20. 20.
    ACPO. Good Practice Guide for Computer based Electronic Evidence (2003),
  21. 21.
    IOCE. Best Practice Guidelines for Examination of Digital Evidence (2002),
  22. 22.
    USSS. Best Practices for Seizing Electronic Evidence (2006),
  23. 23.
    NIJ. Electronic Crime Scene Investigation: A Guide for First Responders (2001),
  24. 24.
    Keizer, G.: First Mobile Phone Java Trojan on the Loose (2006),
  25. 25.
    CCIPS. Searching and Seizing Computers and Related Electronic Evidence Issues (2002),
  26. 26.
    Mellars, B.: Forensic Examination of Mobile Phones. Digital Investigation: The International Journal of Digital Forensics & Incident Response 1(4), 266–272 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Becker, D.: Toshiba Reports Battery Breakthrough (2005),
  28. 28.
    Long, M.: Airborne Viruses: Real Threat or Just Hype (2005),
  29. 29.
    McAfee Mobile Security Report (2008),
  30. 30.
    The Information Technology Act 2000, India (2000),
  31. 31.
    Yahoo News India. The Arushi Murder Case: CBI says it has found the evidence (2008),
  32. 32.
    Helplinelaw, Pramod Mahajan Murder Trial: SMS cannot be valid evidence, says defence (2007),
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
    Ahmed, R., Dharaskar, R.V.: MFL3G: Mobile Forensics Library for digital analysis and reporting of mobile devices for collecting digital evidence. In: 2nd Asia Pacific Mobile Learning & Edutainment Conference 2008, PWTC Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2008)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ahmed, R., Dharaskar, R.V.: MFL3G: An Open Source Mobile Forensics Library For Digital Analysis And Reporting Of Mobile Devices For Collecting Digital Evidence, An Overview From Windows Mobile OS Perspective. In: International Conference on Advanced Computing Technologies (ICACT 2008), GRIET, Hyderabad, India (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rizwan Ahmed
    • 1
  • Rajiv V. Dharaskar
    • 1
  1. 1.P.G. Department of Computer Science and EngineeringG.H. Raisoni College of EngineeringNagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations