Model Urbanization Strategy: Summaries, Recommendations and Requirements

  • Alexander BaklanovEmail author
  • Jason Ching
  • C.S.B. Grimmond
  • Alberto Martilli


The urban canopy (UC), the layer of the atmosphere between the ground and the top of the highest buildings, is the region where people live and human activities take place. Because of this importance (e.g., human health, preservation of buildings) significant efforts have been dedicated to its investigation. Such studies shed light on the high complexity of atmospheric circulations in the UC, primarily because of the presence of obstacles (buildings) large enough to strongly modify air flow and the thermal exchanges between these surfaces and the atmosphere. The high level of heterogeneity of the UC has been a challenge for atmospheric modeling in urban areas, even for mesoscale models with a typical resolution of the order of 1 km; the basic characteristics of the perturbations induced by the obstacles still remaining unresolved at this model resolution. Over the last decade, with the increase of computational processing power, several mesoscale modeling systems, each with different urban canopy parameterization (UCP) schemes, have been developed and applied with the primary aim of representing the subgrid effects of urban surfaces on their mean variables.


Computational Fluid Dynamic Street Canyon Urban Canopy Urban Scheme Anthropogenic Heat Flux 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Baklanov, A., 2006: Overview of the European project FUMAPEX. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2005–2015, Scholar
  2. Baklanov, A., 2007: Urban air flow researches for air pollution, emergency preparedness and urban weather prediction.  Chapter 9 in: Flow and transport processes with complex obstructions: Applications to cities vegetative canopies and industry. Eds. Ye. A. Gayev and J.C.R. Hunt, Springer, 311–357.
  3. Baklanov, A., O. Hänninen, L.H. Slørdal, J. Kukkonen, N. Bjergene, B. Fay, S. Finardi, S.C. Hoe, M. Jantunen, A. Karppinen, A. Rasmussen, A. Skouloudis, R.S. Sokhi, J.H. Sørensen, and V. Ødegaard, 2007: Integrated systems for forecasting urban meteorology, air pollution and population exposure. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 855–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baklanov, A., U. Korsholm, A. Mahura, C. Petersen, and A. Gross, 2008: ENVIRO-HIRLAM: on-line coupled modelling of urban meteorology and air pollution. Adv. Sci. Res., 2, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, M. and M. Williams, 1998: An urban canopy parameterization for mesoscale meteorological models. AMS 2nd Urban Environment Symposium, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
  6. Dupont, S., T.L. Otte, and J.K.S. Ching, 2004: Simulation of meteorological fields within and above urban and rural canopies with a mesoscale model (MM5) Bound.-Layer Meteor., 2004, 113, 111–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernando, H.J.S., S.M. Lee, J. Anderson, M. Princevac, E. Pardyjak, and S. Grossman-Clarke, 2001: Urban fluid mechanics: air circulation and contaminant dispersion in cities. J Environ. Fluid. Mech. 1(1), 107–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grell, G.A., S.E. Peckham, R. Schmitz, S.A. McKeen, G. Frost, W.C. Skamarock, and B. Eder, 2005: Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model. Atmos. Environ., 39(37), 6957–6975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamdi, R. and G. Schayes, 2005: Validation of the Martilli urban boundary layer scheme with measurements from two mid-latitude European cities. Atmos Chem. Phys. Discuss., 5, 4257–4289. SRef-ID: 1680-7375/acpd/2005-5-4257, European Geosciences Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kusaka, H. and F. Kimura, 2004a: Coupling a single-layer urban canopy model with a simple atmospheric model: Impact on urban heat island simulation for an idealized case. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 82, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kusaka, H. and F. Kimura, 2004b: Thermal effects of urban canyon structure on the nocturnal heat island: numerical experiment using a mesoscale model coupled with an urban canopy model. J. Appl. Meteorol., 43, 1899–1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Martilli, A., A. Clappier, and M.W. Rotach, 2002: An urban surface exchange parameterization for mesoscale models. Bound.-Layer Meteorol., 104, 261–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Masson, V., 2000: A physically-based scheme for the urban energy budget in atmospheric models. Bound.-Layer Meteorol., 98, 357–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moussiopoulos, N., 1995: The EUMAC Zooming Model, a tool for local-to-regional air quality studies. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 57, 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sarrat, C., A. Lemonsu, V. Masson, G. Guedalia, 2006: Impact of urban heat island on regional atmospheric pollution. Atmos. Environ., 40, 1743–1758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Baklanov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jason Ching
    • 2
  • C.S.B. Grimmond
    • 3
  • Alberto Martilli
    • 4
  1. 1.Danish Meteorological InstituteCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis DivisionUS Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Research Triangle ParkUSA
  3. 3.King’s College London (KCL)LondonUK
  4. 4.Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y TecnolÓgicas(CIEMAT)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations