How Some Major Components of Religion Could Have Evolved by Natural Selection?

Chapter

Abstract

Religion is a broad concept that is difficult to define, as each definition has exceptions. As a result, it is difficult to ask how religion as a whole could have evolved by natural selection. An alternative is to divide religion into its components – behavior, beliefs, values, moods, and feelings. One can then ask the same question of these components individually. However, there are problems. These components of religion are composed of forms and functions but only forms which have structure can be passed across generations in DNA and evolve directly by natural selection. Therefore, in order for a component of religion to evolve by natural selection it has to contain structural design features. The chapter therefore searches for structural design features in the various components of religion. As will be seen, this is easier to do for some components of religion than for others. However, in the end all the components of religion are accounted for. The chapter also addresses the level of selection from the individual to the group where natural selection could be acting. Finally, the chapter presents evidence for the counter-intuitive proposition that belief in God may have been what created many parts of the human mind– “gifts” as some would say.

References

  1. Atran S (2002) In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Axelrod R (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd R, Richerson P J (1985) Culture and the Evolutionary Process. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Brigandt I (2005) The Instinct Concept of the Early Konrad Lorenz. Journal of the History of Biology 38:571–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chomsky N (1998) On Language. The New Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Darwin C (1859) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawkins R (2006) The God Delusion. Houghton Mifflin Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. De Waal F (1996) Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobzhansky T (1970) Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Dowd M (2007) Thank God for Evolution: How the Marriage of Science and Religion Will Transform Your Life and Our World. Viking/Plume, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Eibl-Eibesfeldt I (1989) Human Ethology. Aldine de Gruyter, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Eibl-Eibesfeldt I (1979) The Biology of Peace and War: Men Animals and Aggression. Thames and Hudson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Ekman P, Friesen W V (1975) Unmasking the Face: A guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Cues. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  14. Feierman J R (ed) (2009) The Biology of Religious Behavior: The Evolutionary Origins of Faith and Religion. Praeger/ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara California and Oxford, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  15. Feierman J R (2006) The Ethology of Psychiatric Populations II: Darwinian Neuropsychiatry. Clinical Neuropsychiatry 3(2):87–109Google Scholar
  16. Fisher R A (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Gould S J, Lewontin R C (1979) The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptionist Programme. Proc R Soc Lond B 205 1161:581–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hinnells J R (1997) The New Penguin Handbook of Living Religions, 2nd edn. Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Young L A (1997) (ed) Rational Choice Theory and Religion: Summary and Assessment. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Irons W (2008) Why People Believe (What Other People See As) Crazy Ideas. In: Bulbulia J, Sosis R, Harris R, Genet R, Genet C, Wyman K (eds) The Evolution of Religion. Collins Foundation Press, Santa Margarita CAGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirkpatrick L (2004) Attachment, Evolution and the Psychology of Religion. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Koenig L B, Bouchard T J Jr (2006) Genetic and Environmental Influences on the Traditional Moral Values Triad – Authoritarianism Conservatism and Religiousness – As Assessed By Quantitative Behavior Genetic Methods. In: MacNamara P (ed) Where God and Science Meet: How Brain and Evolutionary Studies Alter Our Understanding of Religion, Volume I. Evolution Genes and the Religious Brain. Praeger, Westport ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  23. Koenig H G, McCullough M E, Larson D B (2001) Handbook of Religion and Health. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lessa W A, Vogt E Z (1979) (eds) Reader in Comparative Religion: An Anthropological Approach, 4th edn. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Loewenstein W R (1988) The Touchstone of Life: Molecular Information, Cell Communication, and the Foundations of Life. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Lorenz K (1981) The Foundations of Ethology. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. MacDonald K (1994) A People That Shall Dwell Alone: Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy. Praeger, Westport ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  28. MacLean P D (1990) The Triune Brain in Evolution: The Role of the Paleocerebral Functions. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin P, Bateson P (1986) Measuring Behavior: An Introductory Guide. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. McNamara P (2006) (ed) Where God and Science Meet: How Brain and Evolutionary Studies Alter Our Understanding of Religion, Volume I, II and III. Praeger, Westport ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  31. Misslin R (2003) The Defense System of Fear: Behavior and Neurocircuitry. Clinical Neurophysiology 33:55–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pinker S (2006) The Evolutionary Psychology of Religion. In: McNamara P (ed) Where God and Science Meet: How Brain and Evolutionary Studies Alter Our Understanding of Religion, Volume I. Evolution Genes and the Religious Brain. Praeger, Westport ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  33. Price J S, Sloman L (1987) Depression as Yielding Behavior: An Animal Model Based on Schjelderup-Ebbe’s Pecking Order. In: Feierman J R (ed) The Ethology of Psychiatric Populations. Ethology & Sociobiology Supplement 3 8:85–98Google Scholar
  34. Reynolds V, Tanner R (1983) The Biology of Religion. Longman Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Scherer K R, Ekman P (1982) (eds) Handbook of Methods in Nonverbal Behavior Research. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Sosis R (2004) The adaptive value of religious ritual. American Scientist 92:166–172Google Scholar
  37. Tinbergen N (1951) The Study of Instinct. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Vaillant G (2008) Spiritual Evolution: A Scientific Defense of Faith. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson D S (2002) Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry (retired)University of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations