Advertisement

A Soft Computing System for Modelling the Manufacture of Steel Components

  • Andres Bustillo
  • Javier Sedano
  • Leticia Curiel
  • José R. Villar
  • Emilio Corchado
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 57)

Summary

In this paper we present a soft computing system developed to optimize the laser milling manufacture of high value steel components, a relatively new and interesting industrial technique. This multidisciplinary study is based on the application of neural projection models in conjunction with identification systems, in order to find the optimal operating conditions in this industrial issue. Sensors on a laser milling centre capture the data used in this industrial case study defined under the frame of a machine-tool that manufactures steel components like high value molds and dies. The presented model is based on a two-phase application. The first phase uses a neural projection model capable of determine if the data collected is informative enough based on the existence of internal patterns. The second phase is focus on identifying a model for the laser-milling process based on low-order models such as Black Box ones. The whole system is capable of approximating the optimal form of the model. Finally, it is shown that the Box-Jenkins algorithm, which calculates the function of a linear system from its input and output samples, is the most appropriate model to control such industrial task for the case of steel components.

Keywords

Test Piece Angle Error Wall Angle Steel Component Soft Computing Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wendland, J., Harrison, P.M., Henry, M., Brownell, M.: Deep Engraving of Metals for the Automotive Sector Using High Average Power Diode Pumped Solid State Lasers. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Applications of Lasers and Electro-Optics (ICALEO 2005) (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Corchado, E., Fyfe, C.: Connectionist Techniques for the Identification and Suppression of Interfering Underlying Factors. J. of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 17(8), 1447–1466 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diaconis, P., Freedman, D.: Asymptotics of Graphical Projections. The Annals of Statistics 12(3), 793–815 (1984)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Friedman, J.H., Tukey, J.W.: Projection Pursuit Algorithm for Exploratory Data-Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Computers 23(9), 881–890 (1974)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corchado, E., MacDonald, D., Fyfe, C.: Maximum and Minimum Likelihood Hebbian Learning for Exploratory Projection Pursuit. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 8(3), 203–225 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seung, H.S., Socci, N.D., Lee, D.: The Rectified Gaussian Distribution. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 10, pp. 350–356 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fyfe, C., Corchado, E.: Maximum Likelihood Hebbian Rules. In: Proc. of the 10th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN 2002) (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Corchado, E., Han, Y., Fyfe, C.: Structuring Global Responses of Local Filters Using Lateral Connections. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 15(4), 473–487 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ljung, L.: System Identification. Theory for the User. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nögaard, N., Ravn, O., Poulsen, N.K., Hansen, L.K.: Neural Networks for Modelling and Control of Dynamic Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nelles, O.: Nonlinear System Identification. From Classical Approaches to Neural Networks and Fuzzy Models. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haber, R., Keviczky, L.: Nonlinear System Identification, Input-Output Modeling Approach. Part 1: Nonlinear System Parameter Estimation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stoica, P., Söderström, T.: A useful parametrization for optimal experimental design. IEEE Trans. Automatic. Control AC-27 (1982)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    He, X., Asada, H.: A new method for identifying orders of input-output models for nonlinear dynamic systems. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference (1993)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Akaike, H.: Fitting autoregressive models for prediction. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 20, 425–439 (1969)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arias, G., Ciurana, J., Planta, X., Crehuet, A.: Analyzing Process Parameters that influence laser machining of hardened steel using Taguchi method. In: Proceedings of 52nd International Technical Conference, SAMPE 2007 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andres Bustillo
    • 1
  • Javier Sedano
    • 2
  • Leticia Curiel
    • 1
  • José R. Villar
    • 3
  • Emilio Corchado
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of BurgosBurgosSpain
  2. 2.Department of Electromechanical EngineeringUniversity of BurgosBurgosSpain
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of OviedoSpain

Personalised recommendations