Tumor Extraction From Multimodal MRI

  • Moualhi Wafa
  • Ezzeddine Zagrouba
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 57)


Manual segmentation of brain tumor from 3D multimodal magnetic resonance images (MRI) is time-consuming task and leading to human errors. In this paper, two automated approaches has been developed for brain tumor segmentation to discuss which one will provide accurate segmentation that is close to the manual results. The MR feature images used for the segmentation consist of three weighted images (enhanced T1, proton density(PD) and T2) for each axial slice through the head. The first approach is based on multi-features Fuzzy-c-means (FCM) algorithm followed by a post-processing step based on prior knowledge to refine the tumor region. The second approach is three-pass step. First, each single modality MRI is classified separately with FCM algorithm. Second, classified images are fused by Dempster-Shafer evidence theory to get the final brain tissue labeling. Finally, prior knowledge are used to refine the tumor region. For validation, ten tumor cases of different size, shape and location in the brain are used with a total of 200 multimodals MRI.The brain tumor segmentation results are compared against manual segmentation carried out by two independent medical experts and used as the ground truth. Our experimental results suggest that the second approach produces results with comparable accuracy to those of the manual tracing compared to the first approach.


Segmentation Approach Evidence Theory Basic Probability Assignment Tumor Extraction Tumor Volume Measurement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Iftekharuddin, K.M.: On techniques in fractal analysis and their applications in brian MRI. In: Cornelius, T.L. (ed.) Medical imaging systems: technology and applications, Analysis and Computational Methods, vol. 1, pp. 993–999. World Scientific Publications, Singapore (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu, J., Udupa, J.K., Odhner, D., Hackney, D., Moonis, G.: A system for brain tumor volume estimation via MR imaging and fuzzy connectedness. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph., 21–34 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mazzara, G.P., Velthuizen, R.P., Pearlman, J.L., Greenberg, H.M., Wagner, H.: Brain tumor target volume determination for radiation treatment planning through automated MRI segmentation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 300–312 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prastawa, M., Bullitt, E., Ho, S., Gerig, G.: A brain tumor segmentation framework based on outlier detection. Med. Image Anal., 275–283 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahmoud-Ghoneim, D., Toussint, G., Constans, J., Certains, J.-D.d.: Three dimensional texture analysis in MRI: a preliminary evaluation in gliomas. Magn. Reson. Imaging., 983–987 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Runkler, T.A., Bezdek, J.C.: Alternating cluster estimation: a new tool for clustering and function approximation. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 377–393 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smets, P., Kennes, R.: The Transferable Belief Model. Artif. Intell., 191–243 (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moualhi Wafa
    • 1
  • Ezzeddine Zagrouba
    • 1
  1. 1.Equipe de Recherche Systemes Intelligents en Imagerie et Vision ArtificielleInstitut Suprieur d’Informatique, Abou Raihane BayrouniTunisia

Personalised recommendations