Advertisement

Artificial Neural Networks in the Disabled Speech Analysis

  • Izabela Świetlicka
  • Wiesława Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak
  • Elżbieta Smołka
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 57)

Summary

Presented work is a continuation of conducted research concerning automatic detection of disfluency in the stuttered speech. So far, the experiments covered analysis of disorders consisted in syllable repetitions and blockades before words starting with stop consonants. Introduced work gives description of an artificial neural networks application to the recognition and clustering of prolongations, which are one of the most common disfluency that appears among stuttering people.The main aim of the research was to answer a question whether it is possible to create a model built with artificial neural networks that is able to recognize and classify disabled speech. The experiment proceeded in two phases. In the first stage, Kohonen network was applied. During the second phase, two various networks were used and next evaluated with respect to their ability to classify utterances correctly into two, non-fluent and fluent, groups.

Keywords

Radial Basis Function Radial Basis Function Neural Network Radial Basis Function Network Speaker Recognition Stop Consonant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Guntupalli, Z., Kalinowski, V.J., Saltuklaroglu, T.: The Need for Self-Report Data in the Assessment of Stuttering Therapy Efficacy: Repetitions and Prolongations of Speech. The Stuttering Syndrome. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 41(1), 1–18 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Czyżewski, A., Kaczmarek, A., Kostek, B.: Intelligent processing of stuttered speech. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 21(2), 143–171 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garfield, S., Elshaw, M., Wermter, S.: Self-organizing networks for classification learning from normal and aphasic speech. In: The 23rd Conference of the Cogntive Science Society, Edinburgh, Scotland (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak, W.: A comparison of speech envelopes of stutterers and nonstutterers. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 100(2), 1105–1110 (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robb, M., Blomgren, M.: Analysis of F2 transitions in the speech of stutterers and non-stutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders 22(1), 1–16 (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geetha, Y.V., Pratibha, K., Ashok, P., Ravindra, S.K.: Classification of childhood disfluencies using neural networks. Journal of Fluency Disorders 25, 99–117 (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nayak, J., Bhat, P.S., Acharya, R., Aithal, U.V.: Classification and analysis of speech abnormalities. ITBM-RBM 26, 319–327 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ritchings, R.T., McGillion, M., Moore, C.J.: Pathological voice quality assessment using artificial neural networks. Medical Engineering and Physics 24, 561–564 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, W.Y., Chen, S.H., Lin, C.H.J.: A speech recognition method based on the sequential Multi-layer Perceptrons. Neural Networks 9(4), 655–669 (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farrell, K., Mamione, R., Assaleh, K.: Speaker recognition using neural networks and conventional classifiers. IEEE Transaction on Speech and Audio Processing, part 2, 2(1), 194–205 (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leinonen, L., Kangas, J., Torkkola, K., Juvas, A.: Dysphonia detected by pattern recognition of spectral composition. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35, 287–295 (1992)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suganthan, P.N.: Pattern classification using multiple hierarchical overlapped self-organizing maps. Pattern Recognition 34, 2173–2179 (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cosi, P., Frasconi, P., Gori, M., Lastrucci, L., Soda, G.: Competitive radial basis functions training for phone classification. Neurocomputing 34, 117–129 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hadjitodorov, S., Boyanov, B., Dalakchieva, N.: A two-level classifier for text-independent speaker identification. Speech Communication 21, 209–217 (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sarimveis, H., Doganis, P., Alexandridis, A.: A Classification Technique Based on Radial Basis Function Neural Networks. Advances in Engineering Software 37, 218–221 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Szczurowska, I., Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak, W., Smołka, E.: The application of Kohonen and Multilayer Perceptron networks in the speech nonfluency analysis. Archives of Acoustics 31(4), 205–210 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Szczurowska, I., Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak, W., Smołka, E.: Application of artificial neural networks in speech nonfluency recognition. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 16(4A), 335–338 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Szczurowska, I., Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak, W., Smołka, E.: Articulation Rate Recognition by Using Artificial Neural Networks. In: Kurzyñski, M., et al. (eds.) Advances in Soft Computing, vol. 45, pp. 771–777. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Świetlicka, I., Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak, W., Smołka, E.: Detection of Syllable Repetition Using Two-Stage Artificial Neural Networks. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 17(3B), 462–466 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kestler, H.A., Schwenker, F.: Classification of high-resolution ECG signals. In: Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds.) Radial basis function neural networks: theory and applications. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schwenker, F., Kestler, H.A., Palm, G.: Three learning phases for radial-basis-function networks. Neural Networks 14, 439–458 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Izabela Świetlicka
    • 1
  • Wiesława Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak
    • 2
  • Elżbieta Smołka
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of Life SciencesLublinPoland
  2. 2.Laboratory of Biocybernetics, Institute of Computer ScienceMaria Curie-Sklodowska UniversityLublinPoland

Personalised recommendations