Line Detection Methods for Spectrogram Images
Accurate feature detection is key to higher level decisions regarding image content. Within the domain of spectrogram track detection and classification, the detection problem is compounded by low signal to noise ratios and high track appearance variation. Evaluation of standard feature detection methods present in the literature is essential to determine their strengths and weaknesses in this domain. With this knowledge, improved detection strategies can be developed. This paper presents a comparison of line detectors and a novel linear feature detector able to detect tracks of varying gradients. It is shown that the Equal Error Rates of existing methods are high, highlighting the need for research into novel detectors. Preliminary results obtained with a limited implementation of the novel method are presented which demonstrate an improvement over those evaluated.
KeywordsReceiver Operator Curve Equal Error Rate Line Detection Principal Component Analysis Method Receiver Operator Curve Curve
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Paris, S., Jauffret, C.: A new tracker for multiple frequency line. In: Proc. of the IEEE Conference for Aerospace, vol. 4, pp. 1771–1782. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2001)Google Scholar
- 2.Lampert, T.A., O’Keefe, S.E.M.: Active contour detection of linear patterns in spectrogram images. In: Proc. of the 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2008), Tampa, Florida, USA, December 2008, pp. 1–4 (2008)Google Scholar
- 3.Abel, J.S., Lee, H.J., Lowell, A.P.: An image processing approach to frequency tracking. In: Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, March 1992, vol. 2, pp. 561–564 (1992)Google Scholar
- 5.Mingzhi, L., Meng, L., Weining, M.: The detection and tracking of weak frequency line based on double-detection algorithm. In: Int. Symposium on Microwave, Antenna, Propagation and EMC Technologies for Wireless Communications, August 2007, pp. 1195–1198 (2007)Google Scholar
- 7.Mellinger, D.K., Nieukirk, S.L., Matsumoto, H., Heimlich, S.L., Dziak, R.P., Haxel, J., Fowler, M., Meinig, C., Miller, H.V.: Seasonal occurrence of north atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) vocalizations at two sites on the scotian shelf. Marine Mammal Science 23, 856–867 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Chen, C.H., Lee, J.D., Lin, M.C.: Classification of underwater signals using neural networks. Tamkang J. of Science and Engineering 3(1), 31–48 (2000)Google Scholar
- 10.Ghosh, J., Turner, K., Beck, S., Deuser, L.: Integration of neural classifiers for passive sonar signals. Control and Dynamic Systems - Advances in Theory and Applications 77, 301–338 (1996)Google Scholar
- 11.Howell, B.P., Wood, S., Koksal, S.: Passive sonar recognition and analysis using hybrid neural networks. In: Proc. of OCEANS 2003, September 2003, vol. 4, pp. 1917–1924 (2003)Google Scholar
- 12.Shi, Y., Chang, E.: Spectrogram-based formant tracking via particle filters. In: Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, April 2003, vol. 1, pp. I–168–I–171 (2003)Google Scholar
- 13.Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Digital Image Processing, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River (2006)Google Scholar
- 14.Nayar, S., Baker, S., Murase, H.: Parametric feature detection. Int. J. of Computer Vision 27, 471–477 (1998)Google Scholar
- 15.Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern Classification. Wiley-Interscience Publication, Hoboken (2000)Google Scholar