Movement of People and Goods

  • Linda Ramstedt
  • Johanna Törnquist Krasemann
  • Paul Davidsson
Chapter
Part of the Understanding Complex Systems book series (UCS)

Why Read This Chapter?

To gain an overview of approaches to the simulation of traffic and transportation by way of representative examples. Also, to reflect the characteristics and benefits of using social simulation as opposed to other methods within the domain. The chapter will inform both researchers and practitioners in the traffic and transportation domain of some of the applications and benefits of social simulation and relevant issues.

Abstract

Due to the continuous growth of traffic and transportation and a thus increased urgency to analyze resource usage and system behavior, the use of computer simulation within this area has become more frequent and acceptable. This chapter presents an overview of modeling and simulation of traffic and transport systems, and focuses in particular on the imitation of social behavior and individual decision making in these systems. We distinguish between transport and traffic. Transport is an activity where goods or people are moved between points A and B while traffic is referred to as the collection of several transports in a common network such as a road network. We investigate to what extent and how the social characteristics of the users of these different traffic and transport systems are reflected in the simulation models and software. Moreover, we highlight some trends and current issues within this field and provide further reading advice.

References

  1. Alam SJ, Werth B (2008) Studying emergence of clusters in a bus passengers’ seating preference model. Transport Res C Emerg Technol 16(5):593–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bazzan AL (2005) A distributed approach for coordination of traffic signal agents. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 10:131–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Akiva M, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Boxill S, Yu L (2000) An evaluation of traffic simulation models for supporting ITS development (Technical report, SWUTC/00/167602-1). Center for transportation training and research. Texas Southern University, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen X, Zhan FB (2008) Agent-based modeling and simulation of urban evacuation: relative effectiveness of simultaneous and staged evacuation strategies. J Oper Res Soc 59(1):25–33CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung E, Dumont A-G (2009) Transport simulation: beyond traditional approaches. EFPL Press, LausanneCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidsson P, Verhagen H (2013) Types of simulation. Chapter 3 in this volumeGoogle Scholar
  8. Davidsson P, Henesey L, Ramstedt L, Törnquist J, Wernstedt F (2005) An analysis of agent-based approaches to transport logistics. Transport Res C Emerg Technol 13(4):255–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidsson P, Holmgren J, Persson JA, Ramstedt L (2008) Multi agent based simulation of transport chains. In: Padgham L, Parkes D, Müller J, Parsons S (eds) Proceedings of the 7th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS 2008), 12–16 May2008, Estoril. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, pp 1153–1160Google Scholar
  10. de Jong G, Ben-Akiva M (2007) A micro-simulation model of shipment size and transport chain choice. Transport Res B 41(9):950–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dia H (2002) An agent-based approach to modelling driver route choice behaviour under the influence of real-time information. Transport Res C 10(5–6):331–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dia H, Panwai S (2007) Modelling drivers’ compliance and route choice behavior in response to travel information. Nonlinear Dynam 49:493–509CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehlert PAM, Rothkrantz LJM (2001) Microscopic traffic simulation with reactive driving agents. In: Proceedings of intelligent transportation systems 2001. IEEE, Oakland (CA) USA, pp 860–865Google Scholar
  14. El hadouaj S, Drogoul A, Espié S (2000) How to combine reactivity and anticipation: the case of conflict resolution in a simulated road traffic. In: Moss S, Davidsson P (eds) Multi-agent-based simulation: second international workshop, MABS 2000, Boston; Revised and additional papers (Lecture notes in computer science, 1979). Springer, Berlin, pp 82–96Google Scholar
  15. Esser J, Schreckenberg M (1997) Microscopic simulation of urban traffic based on cellular automata. Int J Mod Phys C 8(5):1025–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischer K, Chaib-draa B, Müller JP, Pischel M, Gerber C (1999) A simulation approach based on negotiation and cooperation between agents: a case study. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 29(4):531–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gambardella LM, Rizzoli A, Funk P (2002) Agent-based planning and simulation of combined rail/road transport. Simulation 78(5):293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldberg JB (2004) Operations research models for the deployment of emergency services vehicles. EMS Manage J 1(1):20–39Google Scholar
  19. Gruer P, Hilaire V, Koukam A (2001) Multi-agent approach to modeling and simulation of urban transportation systems. In: Proceedings of the 2001 I.E. international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC 2001), vol 4. Tucson, 7–10 Oct 2001, pp 2499–2504Google Scholar
  20. Hemelriajk C (2013) Animal social behaviour. Chapter 22 in this volumeGoogle Scholar
  21. Hensher DA, Ton TT (2000) A comparison of the predictive potential of artificial neural networks and nested logit models for commuter mode choice. Transport Res E 36(3):155–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holmgren J, Davidsson P, Ramstedt L, Persson JA (2012) TAPAS: a multi-agent-based model for simulation of transport chains. Simulation Model Pract Theory 23:1–18, ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  23. Hunt JD, Gregor BJ (2008) Oregon generation 1 land use transport economic model treatment of commercial movements: case example. In: Hancock KL (Rap.) Freight demand modeling: tools for public-sector decision making; Summary of a conference, Washington, DC, 25–27 Sep 2006 (TRB conference proceedings, 40). Transportation research board, Washington, DC, pp 56–60Google Scholar
  24. Jin X, Abdulrab H, Itmi M (2008) A multi-agent based model for urban demand-responsive passenger transport services. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN 2008), Part of the IEEE world congress on computational intelligence, WCCI 2008, 1–6 June 2008, IEEE, Hong Kong, China, pp 3668–3675Google Scholar
  25. Koorey G (2002) Assessment of rural road simulation modelling tools (Research report, 245). Transfund New Zealand, Wellington. http://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/10092/1561/1/12591251_LTNZ-245-RuralRdSimulatnTools.pdf
  26. Kumar S, Mitra S (2006) Self-organizing traffic at a malfunctioning intersection. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 9(4):3. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/4/3.html Google Scholar
  27. Lee S, Kim Y, Namgung M, Kim J (2005) Development of route choice behavior model using linkage of neural network and genetic algorithm with trip information. KSCE J Civil Eng vol 9, (4):321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li T, Hofker F, Jansma F (2006) Passenger travel behavior model in railway network simulation. In: Perrone LF, Wieland FP, Liu J, Lawson BG, Nicol DM, Fujimoto RM (eds) Proceedings of the 2006 winter simulation conference, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  29. Mahmassani HS (ed) (2005) Transportation and traffic theory: flow, dynamics and human interaction. In: Proceedings of the 16th international symposium on transportation and traffic theory. Elsevier, Oxford, Great BritainGoogle Scholar
  30. Mandiau R, Champion A, Auberlet J-M, Espié S, Kolski C (2008) Behaviour based on decision matrices for a coordination between agents in a urban traffic simulation. Appl Int 28(2):121–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meignan D, Simonin O, Koukam A (2007) Simulation and evaluation of urban bus-networks using a multiagent approach. Simulat Model Pract Theory 15:659–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nagel K, Schreckenberg M (1992) A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. J de Physique I 2(12):2221–2229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ortúzar JD, Willumsen LG (2001) Modelling transport, 3rd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  34. Panwai S, Dia H (2005) A reactive agent-based neural network car following model. In: Proceedings of the 8th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems, Vienna, Austria, 13–16 Sept 2005. IEEE, Vienna, pp 375–380Google Scholar
  35. Pelechano N, O’Brien K, Silverman B, Badler N (2005) Crowd simulation incorporating agent psychological models, roles and communication (Technical report). Center for Human Modeling and Simulation, University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  36. Pursula M (1999) Simulation of traffic systems – an overview. J Geogr Inf Decis Anal 3(1):1–8Google Scholar
  37. Ramstedt L (2008) Transport policy analysis using multi-agent-based simulation. Doctoral dissertation No 2008:09, School of Engineering, Blekinge Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  38. Rindsfüser G, Klügl F (2007) Large-scale agent-based pedestrian simulation. In: Petta P et al (eds) MATES 2007, LNAI 4687, Leipzig, pp 145–156Google Scholar
  39. Rossetti R, Bampi S, Liu R, Van Vleit D, Cybis H (2000) An agent-based framework for the assessment of driver decision-making. In: Proceedings of the 2000 I.E. intelligent transportation systems, IEEE, Dearborn, (MI) USA, IEEE, 387–392Google Scholar
  40. Santos G, Aguirre BE (2004) A critical review of emergency evacuation simulation models. In: Peacock RD, Kuligowski ED (eds) Proceedings of the workshop on building occupant movement during fire emergencies. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, 10–11 June 2004, pp 27–52Google Scholar
  41. Schreckenberg M, Selten S (2004) Human behaviour and traffic networks. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. Strader TJ, Lin FR , Shaw M (1998) Simulation of order fulfillment in divergent assembly supply chains. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 1(2). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/1/2/5.html
  43. Swaminathan J, Smith S, Sadeh N (1998) Modeling supply chain dynamics: a multiagent approach. Decis Sci J 29(3):607–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tapani A (2008) Traffic simulation modeling of rural roads and driver assistance systems. Doctoral thesis, Department of science and technology, Linköping University, LinköpingGoogle Scholar
  45. Terzi S, Cavalieri S (2004) Simulation in the supply chain context: a survey. Comput Ind 53(1):3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Toledo T (2007) Driving behaviour: models and challenges. Transport Rev 27(1):65–84MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. van der Zee DJ, van der Vorst JGAJ (2005) A modelling framework for supply chain simulation: opportunities for improved decision making. Decis Sci 36(1):65–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wahle J, Schreckenberg M (2001) A multi-agent system for on-line simulations based on real-world traffic data. In: Proceedings of the 34th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS’01). Hawaii, USA, IEEEGoogle Scholar
  49. Williams I, Raha N (2002) Review of freight modelling. Final report, DfT Integrated Transport and Economics Appraisal, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang Q, Han B, Li D (2008) Modeling and simulation of passenger alighting and boarding movement in Beijing metro stations. Transport Res C 16:635–649Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linda Ramstedt
    • 1
  • Johanna Törnquist Krasemann
    • 2
  • Paul Davidsson
    • 3
  1. 1.Transport and SocietyVectura ConsultingSolnaSweden
  2. 2.School of ComputingBlekinge Institute of TechnologyKarlshamnSweden
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceMalmö UniversityMalmöSweden

Personalised recommendations