Advertisement

Designing Value-Based Inter-organizational Controls Using Patterns

  • Vera Kartseva
  • Jaap Gordijn
  • Yao-Hua Tan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 14)

Abstract

Networked organizations, consisting of enterprises who exchange things of economic value with each other, often have participants who commit a fraud or perform other actions, not agreed in a contract. To explore such opportunistic behavior, and to design solutions to mitigate it, we propose the e 3 controlapproach. This approach takes the valuable objects, which are exchanged between enterprises, as a point of departure, and proposes a control patterns library to find solutions for various types of opportunistic behavior in network organizations. The practical use of the patterns is illustrated by a case study in the field of renewable electricity supply in UK.

Keywords

Inter-organizational control value network control pattern 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Weill, P., Vitale, M.R.: Place to Space: Migrating to eBusiness ModelsEconomy and Society. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gordijn, J., Akkermans, J.M.: e3-value: Design and evaluation of e-business models. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on e-Business 16(4), 11–17 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gordijn, J., Akkermans, J.M.: Value-based requirements engineering: Exploring innovative e-commerce ideas. Requirements Engineering 8(2), 114–134 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gordijn, J., Yu, E., van der Raadt, B.: E-service design using i* and e3value modeling. IEEE Software 23(3), 26–33 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gordijn, J., Akkermans, J.M.: Business models for distributed energy resources in a liberalized market environment. The Electric Power Systems Research Journal 77(9), 1178–1188 (2007), doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2006.08.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Castro, J., Kolp, M., Mylopoulos, J.: Towards requirements-driven information systems engineering: the tropos project. Information Systems 27, 365–389 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kartseva, V., Gordijn, J., Tan, Y.-H.: Developing a modelling tool for designing control mechanisms in network organisations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ronmey, M.B., Steinbart, P.J.: Accounting Information Systems, 10th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ISACF: Control objectives for information and related technology (cobit). Technical report, Information Systems Audit and Control Foundation (ISACF) (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eisenhardt, K.M.: Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14(1), 57 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anthony, R.N., Govindarajan, V.: Management Control Systems, 11th edn. McGraw Hill Higher Education, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kartseva, V., Hulstijn, J., Baida, Z., Gordijn, J., Tan, Y.-H.: Towards control patterns for smart business networks. In: Vervest, P., van Heck, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the Smart Business Networks Initiative Discovery Session. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kartseva, V., Hulstijn, J., Tan, Y.-H., Gordijn, J.: Towards value-based design patterns for inter-organizational control. In: Waldena, P., Gricar, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference on eValues, Bled, Slovenia. University of Maribor (June 2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kartseva, V., Gordijn, J., Tan, Y.-H.: Designing control mechanisms for value webs: The internet radio case study. In: Vogel, D.R., Walden, P., Gricar, J., Lenart, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 18th BLED conference (e-Integration in Action), pages cdrom, Maribor, SL (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kartseva, V., Hulstijn, J., Gordijn, J., Tan, Y.-H.: Modelling value-based inter-organizational controls in healthcare regulations. In: Proceedings of the 6th IFIP conference on e-Commerce, e-Business, and e-Government, Turku, Finland (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alexander, C.: The Oregon Experiment. Oxford University Press, New York (1975)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fowler, M.: Analysis Patterns: Reusable Object Models. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Seruca, I., Loucopoulos, P.: Towards a systematic approach to the capture of patterns within a business domain. The Journal of Systems and Software (67), 1–18 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hollander, A.S., Denna, E., Cherrington, J.O.: Accounting, Information Technology, and Business Solutions, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, Irwin (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bons, R.W.H.: Designing Trustworthy Trade Procedures for open Electronic Commerce. PhD thesis, University of Rotterdam (1997)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bons, R.W.H., Dignum, F., Lee, R.M., Tan, Y.-H.: A formal analysis of auditing principles for electronic trade procedures. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 5(1), 57–82 (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison Wesley, Boston (1995)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fowler, M., Scott, K.: UML Distilled, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley, Reading (2000)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nuseibeh, B., Kramer, J., Finkelstein, A.: A framework for expressing relationships between multiple views in requirements specification. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 20(10), 760–773 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bons, R.W.H., Lee, R.M., Wagenaar, R.W.: Designing trustworthy interorganizational trade procedures for open electronic commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 2(3), 61–83 (1998)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen, K.T., Lee, R.M.: Schematic evaluation of internal accounting control systems. EURIDIS Research Monograph, RM-1992-08-1, Erasmus University Rotterdam (August 1992)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kartseva, V.: Designing Controls for Network Organization: A Value-Based Approach. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (2008), http://docs.e3value.com/bibtex/pdf/Kartseva2008.pdf
  28. 28.
    OFGEM. The renewables obligation: Annual report 2003-2004. Technical report, Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, United Kingdom (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    OFGEM. Renewables Obligation - Atlantic Electric and Gas Limited and Maverick Energy Limited. Technical Report R/65, Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, United Kingdom (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vera Kartseva
    • 2
  • Jaap Gordijn
    • 1
  • Yao-Hua Tan
    • 2
  1. 1.VUA, Faculty of SciencesAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.VUA, Faculty of EconomicsAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations