Computerized Assessment of Excessive Femoral and Tibial Torsional Deformation by 3D Anatomical Landmarks Referencing

  • K. Subburaj
  • B. Ravi
  • M. G. Agarwal
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 23)

Abstract

Bone torsional deformity is excessive anatomical or axial twist of proximal portion with respect to distal. Accurate, simple, and quick measurement of torsional deformities at preoperative stage is clinically important for decision making in prosthesis design and surgery planning. Commonly used 2D methods for assessing excessive torsion use radiographic images or a set of slices of CT/MR images. The slices representing reference axes of distal and proximal portion are superimposed; the angle between the axes provides a measure of torsion. Representing 3D anatomical landmarks and reference axes in a 2D transverse slice or projected radiographic image leads to inaccurate and inconsistent values. Owing to the complex 3D shape of bones (ex. femur and tibia), there is a need for 3D model based assessment methods with little or no human intervention. Excessive torsion in the tibia and femur affects the procedure of total knee replacement. We present an automated methodology for assessing excessive torsional deformation of femur and tibia bone based on 3D anatomical landmarks based referencing. Reconstructed 3D bone model from a set of CT scan images using tissue segmentation and surface fitting is used in this methodology. Anatomical landmarks on femur and tibia bone are automatically identified based their shape and predefined landmarks spatial adjacency matrix. The identified 3D anatomical landmarks and computed functional and reference axes (femur: neck axis, condylar axis, and long axis; tibia: tibial plateau axis, long axis, and malleolus axis) are used for measuring torsional deformation, using 3D shape reasoning algorithms. The methodology has been implemented in a software program and tested on five sets of CT scan images of lower limb. The computerized methodology is found to be fast and efficient, with reproducible results.

Keywords

anatomical landmarks femoral torsion tibial torsion torsional deformities virtual surgery planning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lackman RD, Torbert JT et al (2008) Inaccuracies in the assessment of femoral anteversion in proximal femoral replacement prostheses. J Arthroplasty 23:97–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwartz M, Lakin G (2003) The effect of tibial torsion on the dynamic function of the soleus during gait. Gait & Posture 17:113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bouchard R, Meeder PJ et al (2004) Evaluation of tibial torsioncomparison of clinical methods and CT. Rofo 176:1278–1284Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brunner R, Baumann JU (1998) Three-dimensional analysis of the skeleton of the lower extremities with 3D-precision radiography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117:351–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Butler-Manuel P, Guy R et al (1992) Measurement of tibial torsion-a technique applicable to ultrasound and CT. Br J Radiol 65:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murphy SB, Simon SR, Kijewski PK et al (1987) Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:1169–1176Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim JS, Park TS et al (2000) Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. 3D modeling method. Med Biol Eng Comput 38:610–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schneider B, Laubenberger J et al (1997) Measurement of femoral anteversion and tibial torsion by MRI. Br J Radiol 70:575–579Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu X, Kim W, Drerup B et al (2005) Tibial torsion measurement by surface curvature. Clin Biomech 20:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davids JR, Davis RB (2007) Tibial torsion: significance and measurement. Gait & Posture 26:169–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Subburaj K, Ravi B (2007) High resolution medical models and geometric reasoning starting from CT/MR images. Proc. IEEE Int Conf CAD Comput Graph, Beijing, China, 2007, 441–444.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Subburaj K, Ravi B, Agarwal MG (2008) Shape reasoning for identifying anatomical landmarks. Comput Aided Des Appl 5:153–160Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cornea ND, Silver D, Min P (2007) Curve-Skeleton Properties, Applications, and Algorithms. IEEE Trans Visualization Comput Graphics 13:530–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Subburaj
    • 1
  • B. Ravi
    • 1
  • M. G. Agarwal
    • 2
  1. 1.OrthoCAD Network Research CentreIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Surgical OncologyTata Memorial HospitalMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations