The Semantic Architecture Tool (SemAT) for Collaborative Enterprise Architecture Development

  • Frank Fuchs-Kittowski
  • Daniel Faust
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5411)

Abstract

In this paper the semantic architecture tool (SemAT) for collaborative EA development is presented. This includes the concept of a semantic wiki-like collaboration tool for collaborative EA management and an EA ontology as a formal representation of the EA. In addition, the prototypical implementation of the semantic collaboration environment is described. Finally, the benefits of the approach are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bucher, T., Fischer, R., Kurpjuweit, S., Winter, R.: Analysis and Application Scenarios of Enterprise Architecture: An Exploratory Study. In: Proceedings of the EDOC Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research TEAR 2006, Tenth IEEE International EDOC Conference EDOC 2006, p. 28. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.C.: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wagter, R., von den Berg, M., Luijpers, J.: Dynamic Enterprise Architecture: How to Make It Work. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rood, M.A.: Enterprise Architecture: Definition, Content, and Utility. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Third Workshop on Enabling Technologies Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, pp. 106–111. IEEE Computer Society, Morgantown (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modeling, Communication and Analysis. Springer, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Open Group: TOGAF - The Open Group Architecture Framework (Version 8.1 “Enterprise Edition”). The Open Group, San Francisco, CA, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schekkerman, J.: How to Survive in the Jungle of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks: Creating or Choosing an Enterprise Architecture Framework, 2nd edn. Trafford Publishing, Victoria (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    CIO (Chief Information Officer) Council: A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture. Technical report. Federal CIO Council, Springfield, VA, USA (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aziz, S., Obitz, T., Modi, R., Sarkar, S.: Enterprise Architecture: A Governance Framework - Part I: Embedding Architecture into the Organization. Technical report. Infosys Technologies Ltd., Bangalore, India (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aziz, S., Obitz, T., Modi, R., Sarkar, S.: Enterprise Architecture: A Governance Framework - Part II: Making Enterprise Architecture Work within the Organization. Technical report. Infosys Technologies Ltd., Bangalore, India (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bittler, R.S., Kreizmann, G.: Gartner Enterprise Architecture Process: Evolution 2005. Gartner Inc., Stamford, CT, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    DoDAF Working Goup: DoD Architecture Framework - Volume I: Definitions and Guidelines (Version 1.5), 23, The United States Department of Defense, April 2007, http://www.defenselink.mil/cio-nii/docs/DoDAF_Volume_I.pdf
  13. 13.
    IFIP–IFAC: GERAM: Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology, Version 1.6.3. IFIP–IFAC Task Force on Architectures for Enterprise Integration (1999), http://www.cit.gu.edu.au/~bernus/taskforce/geram/versions/geram1-6-3
  14. 14.
    Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M., ter Doest, H., Arbab, F., Bosma, H., Wieringa, R.J.: Enterprise Architecture: Management tool and blueprint for the organisation. Information Systems Frontier 8, 63–66 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Narman, P., Johnson, P., Nordstrom, L.: Enterprise Architecture: A Framework Supporting System Quality Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2007), pp. 130–141. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sebis: Enterprise Architecture Management Tool Survey 2005. Report. Technical University Munich, Chair for Informatics 19, Munich, Germany (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winter, R., Fischer, R.: Essential Layers, Artifacts, and Dependencies of Enterprise Architecture. In: Proceedings, EDOC Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR 2006) within The Tenth IEEE International EDOC Conference (EDOC 2006), p. 30. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bucher, T., Fischer, R., Kurpjuweit, S., Winter, R.: Analysis and Application Scenarios of Enterprise Architecture: An Exploratory Study. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEE International Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshop (EDOCW), p. 28. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaisler, S.H., Amour, F., Valivullah, M.: Enterprise Architecting: Critical Problems. In: Proceedings of the 38h Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS-38 2005). IEEE Computer Society, Big Island (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Janssen, M., Hjort-Madsen, K.: Analyzing Enterprise Architecture in National Governments: The cases of Denmark and the Netherlands. In: Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS-40 2007). IEEE Computer Society, Waikoloa (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schekkerman, J.: Extended Enterprise Architecture Framework (E2AF): Essentials Guide v1.5. Institute for Enterprise Architecture Developments, Amersfoort, Netherlands (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    TrouxMetis: Metis Enterprise: Metamodeling and Modeling with Metis Enterprise Architecture Framework (MEAF), v5.2. Troux Technologies Inc., Austin, TX, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bernard, S.A.: An Introduction to Enterprise Architecture, 2nd edn. Authorhouse, Bloomington (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise architecture modelling: the issue of integration. Advanced Engineering Informatics 18(4), 205–216 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bubenko, J.A.j., Persson, A., Stirna, J.: User Guide of the Knowledge Management Approach Using Enterprise Knowledge Patterns. Deliverable D3, IST Programme project Hypermedia and Pattern Based Knowledge Management for Smart Organisations, project no. IST-2000-28401, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden (2001) Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bubenko, J.A.j., Stirna, J., Brash, D.: EKD User Guide. Technical report, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Royal Institute of Technology. Stockholm, Sweden (1997) Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    F3: F3 Reference Manual. Deliverable of ESPRIT III Project 6612, F3-Consortium, Stockholm, Sweden (1994)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Loucopoulos, P., Kavakli, V., Prekas, N., Rolland, C., Grosz, G., Nurcan, S.: Using the EKD Approach: The Modelling Component. Technical report, UMIST, Manchester, UK (1997)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Persson, A., Stirna, J.: An explorative study into the influence of business goals on the practical use of Enterprise Modelling methods and tools. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Systems Development (ISD 2001), pp. 465–468. Kluwer, London (2001)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stirna, J., Mikelsons, J., Kalnins, J.R., Kapenieks, A., Kazakovs, M., Vanaga, I., Sinka, A., Persson, A., Kaindl, H.: Trial Application in the Riga City Council. Technical report, deliverable D6, IST Programme project Hypermedia and Pattern Based Knowledge Management for Smart Organisations, project no. IST-2000-28401, Riga City Council, Riga, Latvia (2002)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Persson, A., Stirna, J., Dulle, H., Hatzenbichler, G., Strutz, G.: Introducing a Pattern Based Knowledge Management Approach: the Verbundplan Case. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Theory and Applications of Knowledge Management (TAKMA 2003) in cooperation with 14th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2003). IEEE Computer Society, Prague (2003)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Persson, A.: Investigating the influence of situation factors on Participative Enterprise Modelling: making a case for a qualitative research approach. In: Proceedings of Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2000), Stockholm, Sweden (2000), http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/hinze/caise00_DC/papers.html
  33. 33.
    Völkel, M., Krötzsch, M., Vrandecic, D., Haller, H., Studer, R.: Semantic Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2006, pp. 585–594. ACM Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schaffert, S.: IkeWiki: A Semantic Wiki for Collaborative Knowledge Management. Technical report, Salzburg Research, Salzburg, Austria (2006), http://ikewiki.salzburgresearch.at
  35. 35.
    Kiesel, M.: Kaukolu: Hub of the Semantic Corporate Intranet. In: Völkl, M., Schaffert, S. (eds.) Proceedings of First Workshop on Semantic Wikis From Wiki to Semantic at the 3rd Annual European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 31–42 (2006), http://CEUR-WS.org/Vol-206/
  36. 36.
    Buffa, M., Crova, G., Gandon, F., Lecompte, C., Passeron, J.: SweetWiki: Semantic Web Enabled Technologies in Wiki. In: Völkl, M., Schaffert, S. (eds.) First Workshop on Semantic Wikis ‘From Wiki to Semantic’ at the 3rd Annual European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 206, pp. 74–88 (2006), http://CEUR-WS.org/Vol-206/
  37. 37.
    Noy, N., Grosso, W., Musen, M.: Knowledge-Acquisition Interfaces for Domain Experts: An Empirical Evaluation of Protégé-2000. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE 2000). Knowledge Systems Institute, Chicago (2000)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5, 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    W3C: Resource Description Framework (RDF) (2004) Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    W3C: Web Ontology Language (OWL) (2004) Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Uschold, M., King, M., Moralee, S., Zorgios, Y.: The Enterprise Ontology. The Knowledge Engineering Review (Special Issue on Putting Ontologies to Use) 13(2) (1998), http://www.aiai.ed.ac.uk/project/enterprise/enterprise/ontology.html
  42. 42.
    Auer, S.: Powl: A Web Based Platform for Collaborative Semantic Web Development. In: Proceedings of 1st Workshop Scripting for the Semantic Web (SFSW 2005), Hersonissos, Greece (2005), http://www.ceur-ws.org/vol-135/paper9.pdf
  43. 43.
    Fuchs-Kittowski, F., Faust, D., Loroff, C., Reuter, P.: WiKo: Eine integrierte Wissens- und Kooperations-Plattform. I-Com 4(1), 12–19 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Fuchs-Kittowski
    • 1
  • Daniel Faust
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Software and Systems Engineering ISSTBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations