Advertisement

Evolutionary Psychology and Sex Differences in Workplace Patterns

  • Kingsley R. BrowneEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Differences in workplace outcomes – such as the “glass ceiling”, the “gender gap in compensation”, and “occupational segregation” – are often attributed primarily to social forces. However, biological sex differences with roots in our evolutionary history and mediated by sex hormones also play an important role.

The sexes differ, on average, along a number of temperamental and cognitive dimensions. Males are higher in competitiveness, dominance-seeking, and risk-taking, while females are higher in nurturance. Males have an advantage in mechanical ability and on some spatial and mathematical tasks, while females outperform males on other spatial and computational tasks, as well as on many verbal tasks. Females tend to be more “person-oriented” and males more “thing-oriented”.

Talents and tastes have major workplace effects, as they influence how high in organizations people progress, how much money they make, and what jobs they hold. Men are more likely to subordinate other things – often including families – to maintain a single-minded focus on success and to take the risks necessary to become top executives. Men earn more money than women because, among other reasons, they tend to work more hours, occupy riskier jobs, and work in less-pleasant environments. Many jobs continue to be highly segregated by sex not just because of cognitive and physical sex differences, but probably even more strongly because of differences in occupational interests.

Keywords

Sex differences Temperament Workplace Testosterone Glass ceiling Gender gap Occupational segregation 

References

  1. Aleman A, Bronk E, Kessels RPC, Koppeschaar HPF, van Honk J (2004) A single administration of testosterone improves visuospatial ability in young women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 29:612–617Google Scholar
  2. Alexander RD, Hoogland JL, Howard RD, Noonan KM, Sherman PW (1979) Sexual dimorphisms and breeding systems in pinnipeds, ungulates, primates, and humans. In: Alexander RD (ed) Evolutionary biology and human social behavior. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, pp 402–435Google Scholar
  3. Alexander GM, Wilcox T, Woods R (2009) Sex differences in infants’ visual interest in toys. Arch Sex Behav 3:427–433Google Scholar
  4. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (2010). Academic pharmacy’s vital statistics. Retrieved from http://www.aacp.org/about/Pages/Vitalstats.aspx
  5. American Bar Association (n.d.) First year and total J.D. enrollment by gender 1947–2008. Retrieved from http://www.abanet.org/legaled/statistics/charts/stats%20-%206.pdf
  6. Arch EC (1993) Risk-taking: A motivational basis for sex differences. Psychol Rep 73:3–11Google Scholar
  7. Aros JR, Henly GA, Curtis NT (1998) Occupational sextype and sex differences in vocational preference-measured interest relationships. J Vocat Behav 53:227–242Google Scholar
  8. Association of American Medical Colleges (2008) U.S. medical school applicants and students 1982–83 to 2007–08. Retrieved from http://www.aamc.org/data/facts/charts1982to2007.pdf
  9. Auyeung B, Baron-Cohen S, Ashwin E, Knickmeyer R, Taylor K, Hackett G, Hines M (2009) Fetal testosterone predicts sexually differentiated childhood behavior in girls and in boys. Psychol Sci 20:144–148Google Scholar
  10. Baldridge DC, Eddleston KA, Veiga JF (2006) Saying “no” to being uprooted: the impact of family and gender on willingness to relocate. J Occup Organ Psychol 79:131–149Google Scholar
  11. Benbow CP, Lubinski D (1993) Psychological profiles of the mathematically talented: some sex differences and evidence supporting their biological basis. In: The origins and development of high ability (Ciba Foundation Symposium). Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  12. Benenson JF, Philippoussis M, Leeb R (1999) Sex differences in neonates’ cuddliness. J Genet Psychol 160:332–342Google Scholar
  13. Benenson JF, Roy R, Waite A, Goldbaum S, Linders L, Simpson A (2002) Greater discomfort as a proximate cause of sex differences in competition. Merrill Palmer Q 48:225–247Google Scholar
  14. Berenbaum SA (1999) Effects of early androgens on sex-typed activities and interests in adolescents with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Horm Behav 35:102–110Google Scholar
  15. Berenbaum SA, Snyder E (1995) Early hormonal influences on childhood sex-typed activity and playmate preferences: implications for the development of sexual orientation. Dev Psychol 31:31–42Google Scholar
  16. Blau F, Kahn L (1992) The gender earnings gap: learning from international comparisons. Am Econ Rev 82:533–538Google Scholar
  17. Bröder A, Hohmann N (2003) Variations in risk taking behavior over the menstrual cycle: an improved replication. Evol Hum Behav 24:391–398Google Scholar
  18. Browne KR (2002) Biology at work: Rethinking sexual equality. Rutgers University Press, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  19. Browne KR (2005) Women in science: biological factors should not be ignored. Cardozo Women’s Law J 11:509–528Google Scholar
  20. Browne KR (2006) Evolved sex differences and occupational segregation. J Organ Behav 27:143–162Google Scholar
  21. Browne KR (2007) Co-ed combat: the new evidence that women shouldn’t fight the nation’s wars. Sentinel (Penguin), New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Burke RJ (1998) Dual career couples: are men still advantaged? Psychol Rep 82:209–210Google Scholar
  23. Burkitt J, Widman D, Saucier DM (2007) Evidence for the influence of testosterone in the performance of spatial navigation in a virtual water maze in women but not in men. Horm Behav 51:649–654Google Scholar
  24. Buss DM (2007) Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the mind, 3rd edn. Allyn & Bacon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Byrnes JP, Miller DC, Schafer WD (1999) Gender differences in risk-taking: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 125:367–383Google Scholar
  26. Campbell A (1999) Staying alive: evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behav Brain Sci 22:203–252Google Scholar
  27. Campbell DW, Eaton WO (1999) Sex differences in the activity level of infants. Infant Child Dev 8:1–17Google Scholar
  28. Carretta TR (1997) Group differences on US Air Force pilot selection tests. Int J Sel Assess 5:115–127Google Scholar
  29. Chauvin KW, Ash RA (1994) Gender earnings differentials in total pay, base pay, and contingent pay. Ind Labor Relat Rev 47:634–649Google Scholar
  30. Cole S, Fiorentine R (1991) Discrimination against women in science: the confusion of outcome with process. In: Zuckerman H, Cole JR, Bruer JT (eds) The outer circle: women in the scientific community. W. W. Norton, New York, pp 205–226Google Scholar
  31. College Board (2009) 2009 College-bound seniors: total group profile. Retrieved from http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/cbs-2009-national-TOTAL-GROUP.pdf
  32. Collier CM, Spokane AR, Bazler JA (1998) Appraising science career interests in adolescent girls and boys. J Career Assess 6:37–48Google Scholar
  33. Connellan J, Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Batki A, Ahluwalia J (2000) Sex differences in human neonatal social perception. Infant Behav Dev 23:113–118Google Scholar
  34. Conti R, Collins MA, Picariello ML (2001) The impact of competition on intrinsic motivation and creativity: considering gender, gender segregation and gender role orientation. Pers Individ Differ 31:1273–1289Google Scholar
  35. Costa PT, Terracciano A, McCrae RR (2001) Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. J Pers Soc Psychol 81:322–331Google Scholar
  36. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Dawis RV, Lofquist LH (1984) A psychological theory of work adjustment. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  38. de Waal FBM (1982) Chimpanzee politics: power and sex among apes. Jonathon Cape, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Douce LA, Hansen JC (1990) Willingness to take risks and college women’s career choice. J Vocat Behav 36:258–273Google Scholar
  40. Dresselhaus MS, Franz JR, Clark BC (1994) United States: interventions to increase the participation of women in physics. Science 263:1392–1393Google Scholar
  41. Eagly AH (1995) The science and politics of comparing women and men. Am Psychol 50:145–158Google Scholar
  42. Fehr-Duda H, de Gennaro M, Schubert R (2006) Gender, financial risk, and probability weights. Theory Decis 60:283–313Google Scholar
  43. Filer RK (1985) Male-female wage differences: the importance of compensating differentials. Ind Labor Relat Rev 38:426–437Google Scholar
  44. Fisher-Thompson D (1993) Adult toy purchases for children: factors affecting sex-typed toy selection. J Appl Dev Psychol 14:385–406Google Scholar
  45. Freeman CE (2004) Trends in educational equity of girls and women: 2004. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES 2005–016), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  46. Furchtgott-Roth D, Stolba C (1999) Women’s figures: an illustrated guide to the economic progress of women in America. AEI Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  47. Galanter M, Palay T (1991) Tournament of lawyers: the transformation of the big law firm. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  48. Galea LA, Kimura D (1993) Sex differences in route-learning. Pers Individ Differ 14:53–65Google Scholar
  49. Geary DC (1996) Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities. Behav Brain Sci 19:229–284Google Scholar
  50. Geary DC (2009) Male, female: the evolution of human sex differences, 2nd edn. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  51. Gouchie C, Kimura D (1991) The relationship between testosterone levels and cognitive ability patterns. Psychoneuroendocrinology 16:323–334Google Scholar
  52. Goy RF, Bercovitch FB, McBrair MC (1988) Behavior masculinization is independent of genital masculinization in prenatally androgenized female rhesus macaques. Horm Behav 22:552–571Google Scholar
  53. Grazier S, Sloane PJ (2008) Accident risk, gender, family status and occupational choice in the UK. Labour Econ 15:938–957Google Scholar
  54. Grey RJ, Gordon GG (1978) Risk-taking managers: who gets the top jobs? Manage Rev 67:8–13Google Scholar
  55. Grimshaw GM, Bryden MP, Finegan JK (1995a) Relations between prenatal testosterone and cerebral lateralization in children. Neuropsychology 9:68–79Google Scholar
  56. Grimshaw GM, Sitarenios G, Finegan JK (1995b) Mental rotation at 7 years: relation with prenatal testosterone levels and spatial play experiences. Brain Cogn 29:85–100Google Scholar
  57. Groshen EL (1991) The structure of the female/male wage differential. J Hum Resour 26:457–472Google Scholar
  58. Halaby CN (2003) Where job values come from: family and schooling background, cognitive ability, and gender. Am Sociol Rev 68:251–278Google Scholar
  59. Halpern DF (2000) Sex differences in cognitive abilities, 3rd edn. Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  60. Hampson E (1990) Variations in sex-related cognitive abilities across the menstrual cycle. Brain Cogn 14:26–43Google Scholar
  61. Harrell TW (1993) The association of marriage and MBA earnings. Psychol Rep 72:955–964Google Scholar
  62. Hassett JM, Siebert ER, Wallen K (2008) Sex differences in rhesus monkey toy preferences parallel those of children. Horm Behav 54:359–364Google Scholar
  63. Hausmann M, Slabbekoorn D, Van Goozen SHM, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Güntürkün O (2000) Sex hormones affect spatial abilities during the menstrual cycle. Behav Neurosci 114:1245–1250Google Scholar
  64. Hedges LV, Nowell A (1995) Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science 269(5220):41–45Google Scholar
  65. Hegarty M, Waller D (2005) Individual differences in spatial abilities. In: Shah P, Miyake A (eds) The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 121–169Google Scholar
  66. Helleday J, Edman G, Ritzen EM, Siwers B (1993) Personality characteristics and platelet MAO activity in women with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). Psychoneuroendocrinology 18:343–354Google Scholar
  67. Hellerstein JK, Neumark D (1998) Wage discrimination, segregation, and sex differences in wages and productivity within and between plants. Ind Relat 37:232–260Google Scholar
  68. Hellerstein JK, Neumark D, and Troske KR (1996) Wages, productivity, and worker characteristics: evidence from plant-level production functions and wage equations. Working paper 5626, National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  69. Hennig M, Jardim A (1977) The managerial woman. Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden CityGoogle Scholar
  70. Hines M, Golombok S, Rust J, Johnston KJ, Golding J, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children Study Team (2002) Testosterone during pregnancy and gender role behavior of preschool children: a longitudinal, population study. Child Dev 73:1678–1687Google Scholar
  71. Hines M, Fane BA, Pasterski VL, Mathews GA, Conway GS, Brook C (2003) Spatial abilities following prenatal androgen abnormality: targeting and mental rotations performance in individuals with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Psychoneuroendocrinology 28:1010–1026Google Scholar
  72. Holland JL (1997) Making vocational choices: a theory of vocational personalities and work environments, 3rd edn. Psychological Assessment Resources, OdessaGoogle Scholar
  73. Holloway M (1993) A lab of her own. Sci Am 269:94–103Google Scholar
  74. Jensen AR (1998) The g factor: the science of mental ability. Praeger, WestportGoogle Scholar
  75. Kaufman AS, McLean JE (1998) An investigation into the relationship between interests and intelligence. J Clin Psychol 54:279–295Google Scholar
  76. Kilbourne BS, England P (1996) Occupational skill, gender, and earnings. In: Dubeck PJ, Borman K (eds) Women and work: a handbook. Garland Publishing, New York, pp 68–70Google Scholar
  77. Kimura D (1999) Sex and cognition. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  78. Kolakowski D, Malina RM (1974) Spatial ability, throwing accuracy and man’s hunting heritage. Nature 251:410–412Google Scholar
  79. Konrad AM, Ritchie JE Jr, Lieb P, Corrigall E (2000) Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 126:593–641Google Scholar
  80. Korenman S, Neumark D (1992) Marriage, motherhood, and wages. J Hum Resour 27:233–255Google Scholar
  81. Kruger D, Byker D (2009) Evolved foraging psychology underlies sex differences in shopping experiences and behaviors. J Soc Evol Cult Psychol 3(4):1–15Google Scholar
  82. Lacreuse A, Verreault M, Herndon JG (2001) Fluctuations in spatial recognition memory across the menstrual cycle in female rhesus monkeys. Psychoneuroendocrinology 26:623–639Google Scholar
  83. Larkin JE, Pines HA (2003) Gender and risk in public performance. Sex Roles 49:197–210Google Scholar
  84. Leveroni C, Berenbaum SA (1998) Early androgen effects on interest in infants: evidence from children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Dev Neuropsychol 14:321–340Google Scholar
  85. Lin Y-H, Chen C-Y, Luo J-L (2008) Gender and age distribution of occupational fatalities in Taiwan. Accid Anal Prev 40(4):1604–1610Google Scholar
  86. Lippa R (1998) Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: the importance of the people-things dimension. J Pers Soc Psychol 74:996–1009Google Scholar
  87. Lubinski D, Benbow CP (1992) Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: implications for the math-science pipeline. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 1:61–66Google Scholar
  88. Lubinski D, Benbow CP, Sanders CE (1993) Reconceptualizing gender differences in achievement among the gifted. In: Heller KA, Mönks FJ, Passow AH (eds) International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 693–707Google Scholar
  89. Lubinski D, Webb RM, Morelock MJ, Benbow CP (2001) Top 1 in 10, 000: a 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. J Appl Psychol 86:718–729Google Scholar
  90. Lueptow LB, Garovich-Szabo L, Lueptow MB (2001) Social change and the persistence of sex typing: 1974–1997. Soc Forces 80:1–35Google Scholar
  91. Maccoby EE, Jacklin CN (1974) The psychology of sex differences. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  92. MacCrimmon KR, Wehrung DA (1990) Characteristics of risk taking executives. Manage Sci 36:422–435Google Scholar
  93. Martin CL, Fabes RA (2002) The stability and consequences of young children’s same-sex peer interactions. Dev Psychol 37:431–446Google Scholar
  94. Mazur A, Booth A (1998) Testosterone and dominance in men. Behav Brain Sci 21:352–397Google Scholar
  95. McCormick CM, Teillon SM (2001) Menstrual cycle variation in spatial ability: relation to salivary cortisol levels. Horm Behav 39:29–38Google Scholar
  96. McCrae RR, Terracciano A, Personality Profiles of Culture Project (2005) Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. J Pers Soc Psychol 88:547–561Google Scholar
  97. McPheron T (2007) 2007 is DVM year of the woman. JAVMA News. June 15. Retrieved from http://www.avma.org/onlnews/javma/jun07/070615d.asp
  98. Mealey L (2000) Sex differences: developmental and evolutionary strategies. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  99. Miller GF (2000) The mating mind: how sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  100. Moore DS, Johnson SP (2008) Mental rotation in human infants. Psychol Sci 19:1063–1066Google Scholar
  101. Morrison AM, White RP, Van Velsor E, Center for Creative Leadership (1992) Breaking the glass ceiling: can women reach the top of America’s largest corporations? Updated edn. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  102. National Science Foundation (2009) Science and Engineering Doctorate Awards: 2006. NSF 09-311. Retrieved from http://nsf.gov/statistics/nsf09311/pdf/nsf09311.pdf
  103. Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2008) Gender differences in competition. Negot J 24:447–463Google Scholar
  104. Nyborg H (1994) Hormones, sex, and society: the science of physicology. Praeger, WestportGoogle Scholar
  105. O’Connor DB, Archer J, Hair WM, Wu FCW (2001) Activational effects of testosterone on cognitive function in men. Neuropsychologia 39:1385–1394Google Scholar
  106. O’Farrell B (1999) Women in blue collar and related occupations at the end of the millennium. Q Rev Econ Finance 39:699–722Google Scholar
  107. Osborne J, Simon S, Collins S (2003) Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. Int J Sci Educ 25:1049–1079Google Scholar
  108. Pasterski VL, Geffner ME, Brain C, Hindmarsh P, Brook C, Hines M (2005) Prenatal hormones and postnatal socialization by parents as determinants of male-typical toy play in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Child Dev 76:264–278Google Scholar
  109. Pheasant ST (1983) Sex differences in strength: some observations on their variability. Appl Ergon 14:205–211Google Scholar
  110. Plavcan JM, Van Schaik CP (1997) Intrasexual competition and body weight dimorphism in anthropoid primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 103:37–68Google Scholar
  111. Prediger DJ (1982) Dimensions underlying Holland’s hexagon: missing link between interests and occupations? J Vocat Behav 21:259–287Google Scholar
  112. Puts DA, McDaniel MA, Jordan CL, Breedlove SM (2008) Spatial ability and prenatal androgens: meta-analyses of congenital adrenal hyperplasia and digit ratio (2D:4D) studies. Arch Sex Behav 37:100–111Google Scholar
  113. Quinn PC, Liben LS (2008) A sex difference in mental rotation in young infants. Psychol Sci 19:1067–1070Google Scholar
  114. Rhoads SE (1993) Incomparable worth: pay equity meets the market. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  115. Rosovsky H, Hartley M (2002) Evaluation and the academy: are we doing the right thing? Grade inflation and letters of recommendation. American Academy of Arts & Sciences, at 5–6 (2002). Retrieved from http://www.amacad.org/publications/monographs/Evaluation_and_the_Academy.pdf
  116. Schmitt DP, Realo A, Voracek M, Allik J (2008) Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. J Pers Soc Psychol 94:168–182Google Scholar
  117. Schrader MP, Wann DL (1999) High-risk recreation: the relationship between participant characteristics and degree of involvement. J Sport Behav 22:426–441Google Scholar
  118. Schwartz FN (1992) Breaking with tradition: women and work, the new facts of life. Warner Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  119. Servin A, Bohlin G, Berlin L (1999) Sex differences in 1-, 3-, and 5-year-olds’ toy choice in a structured play-session. Scand J Psychol 40:43–48Google Scholar
  120. Servin A, Nordenström A, Larsson A, Bohlin G (2003) Prenatal androgens and gender-typed behavior: a study of girls with mild and severe forms of congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Dev Psychol 39:440–450Google Scholar
  121. Seymour E, Hewitt NM (1997) Talking about leaving. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  122. Shea DL, Lubinski D, Benbow CP (2001) Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: a 20-year longitudinal study. J Educ Psychol 93:604–614Google Scholar
  123. Silverman I, Eals M (1992) Sex differences in spatial abilities: evolutionary theory and data. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 533–553Google Scholar
  124. Slabbekoorn D, van Goozen SHM, Megens J, Gooren LJG, Cohen-Kettenis P (1999) Activating effects of cross-sex hormones on cognitive functioning: a study of short-term and long-term hormone effects in transsexuals. Psychoneuroendocrinology 24:423–447Google Scholar
  125. Smith A (1776) Wealth of nations. Harriman House, PetersfieldGoogle Scholar
  126. Snyder TD, Dillow SA, Hoffman CM (2009) Digest of Education Statistics 2008. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES 2009-020), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  127. Stenstrom E, Stenstrom P, Saad G, Cheikhrouhou S (2008) Online hunting and gathering: an evolutionary perspective on sex differences in website preferences and navigation. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 51(2):155–168Google Scholar
  128. Su R, Rounds J, Armstrong PI (2009) Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychol Bull 135:859–884Google Scholar
  129. Tooby J, Cosmides L (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 19–136Google Scholar
  130. Townsend B (1996) Room at the top for women. Am Demogr 18(7):28–37Google Scholar
  131. Tremblay RE, Schaal B, Boulerice B, Arseneault L, Soussignan RG, Paquette D et al (1998) Testosterone, physical aggression, dominance, and physical development in early adolescence. Int J Behav Dev 22:753–777Google Scholar
  132. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell BG (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  133. Udry JR (2000) Biological limits of gender construction. Am Sociol Rev 65:443–457Google Scholar
  134. Udry JR, Morris NM, Kovenock J (1995) Androgen effects on women’s gendered behaviour. J Biosoc Sci 27:359–368Google Scholar
  135. U.S. Census Bureau (2008) Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2007. Current population reports: consumer income. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/p60-235.pdf
  136. U.S. Department of Labor (2007) Women in the labor force: a databook bureau of labor statistics. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2007.pdf
  137. U.S. Department of Labor (2008a) Census of fatal occupational injuries all worker profile, 1992–2002. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cftb0186.pdf
  138. U.S. Department of Labor (2008b) Employment and earnings, January 2008, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/opub/ee/empearn200801.pdf
  139. U.S. Department of Labor (2009a) Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI) – Current and Revised Data. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshcfoi1.htm
  140. U.S. Department of Labor (2009b) Census of fatal occupational injuries charts, 1992–2007 (revised data). Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfch0006.pdf
  141. U.S. Department of Labor (2009c) Quick facts on nontraditional occupations for women. Women’s Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/wb/factsheets/nontra2008.htm
  142. Van Goozen SH, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Gooren LJ, Frijda NH, Van de Poll NE (1995) Gender differences in behaviour: activating effects of cross-gender hormones. Psychoneuroendocrinology 20:343–363Google Scholar
  143. Van Vugt M, De Cremer D, Janssen DP (2007) Gender differences in cooperation and competition: the male-warrior hypothesis. Psychol Sci 18:19–23Google Scholar
  144. Voyer D, Voyer S, Bryden MP (1995) Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychol Bull 117:250–270Google Scholar
  145. Watson NV, Kimura D (1991) Nontrivial sex differences in throwing and intercepting: relation to psychometrically-defined spatial functions. Pers Individ Differ 12:375–385Google Scholar
  146. Weinberg BA (2000) Computer use and the demand for female workers. Ind Labor Relat Rev 53:290–305Google Scholar
  147. Weinberger N, Stein K (2008) Early competitive game playing in same- and mixed-gender peer groups. Merrill Palmer Q 54:499–514Google Scholar
  148. Wood W, Eagly AH (2002) A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychol Bull 128:699–727Google Scholar
  149. Xie Y, Shauman KA (1998) Sex differences in research productivity: new evidence about an old puzzle. Am Sociol Rev 63:847–870Google Scholar
  150. Zuckerman H (1991) The careers of men and women scientists: a review of current research. In: Zuckerman H, Cole JR, Bruer JT (eds) The outer circle: women in the scientific community. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wayne State University Law SchoolDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations