Advertisement

Numerical Analysis for Magnetic Control of Heat-Transfer and Pressure in Hypersonic Shock Wave Interference Flows

  • Daisuke Tsubakino
  • Yoshiteru Tanaka
  • Kozo Fujii
Conference paper

Abstract

Local heat-transfer and pressure increases due to shock wave interference are critical problems in structural designs for complicated hypersonic vehicles. Therefore, many experiments and computational simulations have been done to identify the critical shock interference phenomena [1, 2, 3]. Types of the shock interference were classified by Edney in Ref. [1]. His classification shows that some types are severe interference and the others types are not. The most critical interference is called Type IV.

Keywords

Free Stream Computational Simulation Blunt Body Hypersonic Vehicle Magnetic Control 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Edney, B. E., “Anomalous Heat Transfer and Pressure Distributions on Blunt Bodies at Hypersonic Speeds in the Presence of an Impinging Shock,” FFA Report 115, Aeronautical Research Institute of Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wieting, A. R. and Holden, M. S., “Experimental Shock-Wave Interference Heating on a Cylinder at Mach 6 and 8,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 27, No. 11, 1989, pp. 1557–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yamamoto, S. and Kano, S., “Structure of Bow Shock and Compression Wave Interactions in Unsteady Hypersonic Shock/Shock Interference Flow,” AIAA Paper 96–2152, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Poggie, J. and Gaitonde, D. V., “Magnetic control of flow past a blunt body: Numerical validation and exploration,” Physics of Fluid, Vol. 14, No. 5, 2002, pp. 1720–1731.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fujino, T., Funaki, I., Sugita, H., Mizuno, M., and Ishikawa, M., “Numerical Analyses on Flow Control around Blunt Body “OREX” by Magnetic Field,” AIAA Paper 2003–3760, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wada, Y. and Liou, M. S., “A Flux Splitting Scheme with High-Resolution and Robustness for Discontinuities,“ AIAA Paper 94–0083, 1994.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yoon, S. and Jameson, A., “Lower-Upper Symmetric-Gauss-Seidel Method for the Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 26, No. 9, 1988, pp. 1025–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Leer, B., “Toward the ultimate Conservative Difference Scheme. 4, A New Approach to Numerical Convection,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 23, March 1977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daisuke Tsubakino
    • 1
  • Yoshiteru Tanaka
    • 2
  • Kozo Fujii
    • 3
  1. 1.University of TokyoSagamihara KanagawaJapan
  2. 2.University of Tokyo, currentlyToyotaJapan
  3. 3.ISAS/JAXASagamihara KanagawaJapan

Personalised recommendations