Including Heterogeneous Web Accessibility Guidelines in the Development Process

  • Myriam Arrue
  • Markel Vigo
  • Julio Abascal
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4940)


The use of web applications has extremely increased in the last few years. However, some groups of users may experience difficulties when accessing them. Many different sets of accessibility guidelines have been developed in order to improve the quality of web interfaces. Some of them are of general purpose whereas others are specific for user, application or access device characteristics. The existing amount of heterogeneous accessibility guidelines makes it difficult to find, select and handle them in the development process. This paper proposes a flexible framework which facilitates and promotes the web accessibility awareness during all the development process. The basis of this framework is the Unified Guidelines Language (UGL), a uniform guidelines specification language developed as a result of a comprehensive study of different sets of guidelines. The main components of the framework are the guidelines management tool and the flexible evaluation module. Therefore, sharing, extending and searching for adequate accessibility guidelines as well as evaluating web accessibility according to different sets of guidelines become simpler tasks.


Accessibility Evaluation Accessibility Guideline Guideline Definition Automatic Evaluation Tool Define Test Case 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Hoffman, D., Grivel, E., Battle, L.: Designing software architectures to facilitate accessible Web applications. IBM Systems Journal 44(3), 467–483 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murugesan, S., Ginige, A.: Web Engineering: Introduction and Perspectives. In: Suh, W. (ed.) Web Engineering: Perspectives and Techniques. Idea Group (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stephanidis, C., Savidis, A.: Universal Access in the Information Society: Methods, Tools, and Interaction Technologies. Universal Access in the Information Society 1(1), 40–55 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Savidis, A., Stephanidis, C.: Unified user interface development: the software engineering of universally accessible interactions. Universal Access in the Information Society 3(3-4), 165–193 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., Jacobs, I. (eds.): Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (May 5, 1999),
  6. 6.
    Mariage, C., Vanderdonckt, J., Pribeanu, C.: State of the Art of Web Usability Guidelines, ch. 41. In: The Handbook of Human Factors in Web Design. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abascal, J., Nicolle, C.: Why Inclusive Design Guidelines, ch. 1. In: Abascal, J., Nicolle, C. (eds.) Inclusive Design Guidelines for HCI. Taylor & Francis, Abington (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Luque, V., Delgado, C., Gaedke, M., Nussbaumer, M.: Web Composition with WCAG in mind. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A), pp. 38–45 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lang, T.: Comparing website accessibility evaluation methods and learnings from usability evaluation methods (2003),
  10. 10.
    Ivory, M.Y.: Automated Web Site Evaluation: Researchers’ and Practitioners’ Perspectives. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Center for IT Accommodation (CITA) U.S. Section 508 Guidelines,
  12. 12.
    Brajnik, G.: Web Accessibility Testing: When the Method Is the Culprit. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4061, pp. 234–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nielsen, J., Mack, R.: Usability Inspection Methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rubin, J.: Handbook of Usability Testing. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Petrie, H., Hamilton, F., King, N., Pavan, P.: Remote usability evaluations with disabled people. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (CHI 2006), pp. 1133–1141 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abascal, J., Arrue, M., Fajardo, I., Garay, N., Tomás, J.: The use of guidelines to automatically verify Web accessibility. Universal Access in the Information Society 3(1), 71–79 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vanderdonckt, J., Bereikdar, A.: Automated Web Evaluation by Guideline Review. Journal of Web Engineering 4(2), 102–117 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leporini, B., Paternò, F., Scorcia, A.: Flexible tool support for accessibility evaluation. Interacting with Computers 18(5), 869–890 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Takata, Y., Nakamura, T., Seki, H.: Accessibility Verification of WWW Documents by an Automatic Guideline Verification Tool. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luque, V., Delgado, C., Gaedke, M., Nussbaumer, M.: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2005, pp. 1146–1147 (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    IBM Accessibility Center: Developer guidelines for Web Accessibility,
  22. 22.
    Freed, G., Rothberg, M., Wlodkowski, T.: Making Educational Software and Web Sites (2003),
  23. 23.
    Kurniawan, S., Zaphiris, P.: Research-derived web design guidelines for older people. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS 2005), pp. 129–135 (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rabin, J., McCathieNevile, C. (eds.): Mobile Web Best Practtices (W3C Candidate Recommendation) (June 27, 2006),
  25. 25.
    Mariage, C., Vanderdonckt: Creating Contextualised Usability Guides for Web Sites Design and Evaluation. In: Jacob, R., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces, CADUI 2004, pp. 147–158 (2004)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leporini, B., Paternò, F., Scorcia, A.: An Environment for Defining and Handling Guidelines for the Web. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4061, pp. 176–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abou-Zahra, S., McCathieNevile, C.: Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 Schema (Working draft) (September 27, 2006),

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Myriam Arrue
    • 1
  • Markel Vigo
    • 1
  • Julio Abascal
    • 1
  1. 1.University of the Basque Country, Informatika FakultateaDonostiaSpain

Personalised recommendations