Advertisement

Semantic Portals for Cultural Heritage

  • Eero HyvönenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks on Information Systems book series (INFOSYS)

Summary

Cultural heritage is a promising application domain for semantic web technologies due the semantic richness and heterogeneity of cultural content, and the distributed ways in which the content is created in memory organizations and by citizens. This chapter overviews issues and research related to creating semantic portals for publishing cultural heritage collections and other content on the web.

Keywords

Domain Ontology Content Provider Memory Organization Cultural Content Semantic Interoperability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the national semantic web ontology project FinnONTO39 2003–2010 in Finland, funded by the National Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (Tekes) and a consortium of 38 public organizations and companies.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Aitchison, A. Gilchrist, and D. Bawden. Thesaurus construction and use: a practical manual. Europa, London, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Aroyo, R. Brussee, L. Rutledge, P. Gorgels, N. Stash, and Y. Wang. Personalized museum experience: The Rijksmuseum use case. In J. Trant and D. Bearman, editors, Museums and the Web 2007: Proceedings, pages 137–144, 2007.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Aroyo, E. Hyvönen, and J. van Ossenbruggen, editors. Cultural Heritage on the Semantic Web. Workshop Proceedings. The 6th International Semantic Web Confereence and the 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, Busan, Korea. 2007.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Aroyo, N. Stash, Y. Wang, P. Gorgels, and L. Rutledge. CHIP demonstrator: Semantics-driven recommendations and museum tour generation. In Proceedings of ISWC 2007 + ASWC 2007, Busan, Korea, pages 879–886. Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. Addison-Wesley, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. R. Benjamins, J. Contreras, M. Blázquez, J.M. Dodero, A. Garcia, E. Navas, F. Hernandez, and C. Wert. Cultural heritage and the semantic web. In The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, pages 433–444. Springer, 2004.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Berners-Lee, Y. Chen, L. Chilton, D. Connolly, J. Hollenbach R. Dhanaraj, A. Lerer, and D. Sheets. Tabulator: Exploring and analyzing linked data on the semantic web. In The 3rd International Semantic Web User Interaction Workshop (SWUI 2006), Nov 2006.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Buntine, K. Valtonen, and M. Taylor. The ALVIS document model for a semantic search engine. In The 2nd Annual European Semantic Web Conference, Demos and Posters, Heraklion, Crete, May 2005.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Burke. Knowledge-based recommender systems. In A. Kent, editor, Encyclopedia of Library and Information Systems, volume 69. Marcel Dekker, New York, 2000.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Decker, M. Erdmann, D. Fensel, and R. Studer. Ontobroker: Ontology based access to distributed and semi-structured unformation. In R. Meersman et al., editor, DS-8: Semantic Issues in Multimedia Systems, pages 351–369. Kluwer, New York, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Doerr. The CIDOC CRM – an ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Magazine, 24(3):75–92, 2003.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. English, M. Hearst, R. Sinha, K. Swearingen, and K.-P. Lee. Flexible search and navigation using faceted metadata. Technical report, University of Berkeley, School of Information Management and Systems, 2003.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Fellbaum, editor. WordNet. An electronic lexical database. MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2001.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Fensel. Ontologies: Silver bullet for knowledge management and electronic commerce (2nd Edition). Springer, Berlin, 2004.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. J. Foskett. Thesaurus. In Encyclopaedia of Library and Information Science, volume 30, pages 416–462. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. Geroimenko and C. Chen, editors. Visualizing the Semantic Web: XML-based Internet and Information Visualization. Springer, Berlin, 2002.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. Goble, S. Bechhofer, L. Carr, D. De Roure, and W. Hall. Conceptual open hypermedia = the semantic web? In Proceedings of the WWW2001, Semantic Web Workshop, Hongkong, 2001.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Hameed, A. Preese, and D. Sleeman. Ontology reconciliation. In S. Staab and R. Studer, editors, Handbook on ontologies, pages 231–250. Springer, Berlin, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Hearst, A. Elliott, J. English, R. Sinha, K. Swearingen, and K.-P. Lee. Finding the flow in web site search. CACM, 45(9):42–49, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. H. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 241–250. ACM, 2000.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Hildebrand, J. van Ossenbruggen, and L. Hardman. /facet: A browser for heterogeneous semantic web repositories. In Proceedings of the 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2006). Springer, Nov 2006.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Holi and E. Hyvönen. Fuzzy view-based semantic search. In Proceedings of the 1st Asian Semantic Web Conference (ASWC2006), Beijing, China. Springer, 2006.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    L. Hollink. Semantic annotation for retrieval of visual resources. PhD thesis, Free Univerisity of Amsterdam, 2006. SIKS Dissertation Series, No. 2006-24.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Hyvönen and E. Mäkelä. Semantic autocompletion. In Proceedings of the first Asia Semantic Web Conference (ASWC 2006), Beijing. Springer, 2006.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    E. Hyvönen, E. Mäkela, M. Salminen, A. Valo, K. Viljanen, S. Saarela, M. Junnila, and S. Kettula. MuseumFinland—Finnish museums on the semantic web. Journal of Web Semantics, 3(2):224–241, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    E. Hyvönen, T. Ruotsalo, T. Häggström, M. Salminen, M. Junnila, M. Virkkil, M. Haaramo, T. Kauppinen, E. Mäkelä, and K. Viljanen. CultureSampo–Finnish culture on the semantic web. The vision and first results. In Semantic Web at Work—Proceedings of STeP 2006. Finnish AI Society, Espoo, Finland, 2006. To appear in: Klaus Robering (Ed.), Information Technology for the Virtual Museum. LIT Verlag, Berlin, 2008.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    E. Hyvönen, S. Saarela, and K. Viljanen. Application of ontology techniques to view-based semantic search and browsing. In The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. Proceedings of the First European Semantic Web Symposium (ESWS 2004). Springer, 2004.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    E. Hyvönen, M. Salminen, S. Kettula, and M. Junnila. A content creation process for the Semantic Web, May 2004. Proceeding of OntoLex 2004: Ontologies and Lexical Resources in Distributed Environments, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. Hyvönen, A. Valo, K. Viljanen, and M. Holi. A logic-based semantic web HTML generator — a poor man’s publishing approach. In Proceedings of WWW2004, New York, Alternate Track Papers and Posters, May 2004.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    E. Hyvönen, K. Viljanen, E. Mäkelä, T. Kauppinen, T. Ruotsalo, O. Valkeapää, K. Seppälä, O. Suominen, O. Alm, R. Lindroos, T. Känsälä, R. Henriksson, M. Frosterus, J. Tuominen, R. Sinkkilä, and J. Kurki. Elements of a national semantic web infrastructure — case study Finland on the semantic web (invited paper). In Proceedings of the First International Semantic Computing Conference (IEEE ICSC 2007), Irvine, California, Sept 2007. IEEE.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    E. Hyvönen, K. Viljanen, J. Tuominen, and K. Seppälä. Building a national semantic web ontology and ontology service infrastructure — the FinnONTO approach. In Proceeedings of the 5th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2008). Springer, 2008.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    M. Junnila, E. Hyvönen, and M. Salminen. Describing and linking cultural semantic content by using situations and actions. In Semantic Web at Work — Proceedings of STeP 2006. Finnish AI Society, Espoo, Finland, Nov 2006. Also in: Klaus Robering (Ed.), Information Technology for the Virtual Museum. LIT Verlag, Berlin, 2008.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    T. Känsälä and E. Hyvönen. A semantic view-based portal utilizing Learning Object Metadata, August 2006. 1st Asian Semantic Web Conference (ASWC2006), Proceedings of the Semantic Web Applications and Tools Workshop.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    T. Kauppinen, C. Deichstetter, and E. Hyvönen. Temp-O-Map: Ontology-based search and visualization of spatio-temporal maps. In Demo track at the European Semantic Web Conference ESWC 2007, Innsbruck, Austria, June 4–5 2007. http://www.eswc2007.org/demonstrations.cfm.
  35. 35.
    T. Kauppinen, R. Henriksson, R. Sinkkilä, R. Lindroos, J. Väätäinen, and E. Hyvönen. Ontology-based Disambinguation of Spatiotemporal Locations. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Identity and Reference on the Semantic Web (IRSW2008), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol 422, http://ceur-ws.org,2008.
  36. 36.
    T. Kauppinen, R. Henriksson, J. Väätäinen, C. Deichstetter, and E. Hyvönen. Ontology-based modeling and visualization of cultural spatio-temporal knowledge. In Semantic Web at Work — Proceedings of STeP 2006. Finnish AI Society, Espoo, Finland, Nov 2006.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Michael S. Lew, Nicu Sebe, Chabane Djeraba, and Ramesh Jain. Content-based multimedia information retrieval: state of the art and challenges. ACM Transactions on Multimedia computing, communications, and applications, pages 1–19, Feb 2006.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    A. Maedche, S. Staab, N. Stojanovic, R. Struder, and Y. Sure. Semantic portal — the SEAL approach. Technical report, Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe, Germany, 2001.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    E. Mäkelä, E. Hyvönen, and S. Saarela. Ontogator — a semantic view-based search engine service for web applications. In Proceedings of the 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2006), Nov 2006.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    E. Mäkelä, K. Viljanen, O. Alm, J. Tuominen, O. Valkeapää, T. Kauppinen, J. Kurki, R. Sinkkilä, T. Känsälä, R. Lindroos, O. Suominen, T. Ruotsalo, and E. Hyvönen. In L. Nixon, R. Cuel, and C. Bergamini, editors, Proceedings of the Workshop onFirst Industrial Results of Semantic Technologies, co-located with ISWC 2007 + ASWC 2007, Busan, Korea, 2007. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 293.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    A. Maple. Faceted access: A review of the literature. Technical report, Working Group on Faceted Access to Music, Music Library Association, 1995.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    A. S. Pollitt. The key role of classification and indexing in view-based searching. Technical report, University of Huddersfield, UK, 1998. http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla63/63polst.pdf.
  43. 43.
    D. Reynolds, P. Shabajee, and S. Cayzer. Semantic Information Portals. In Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference, Alternate track papers and posters, New York, NY, USA, May 2004. ACM.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Y. Rui, T. Huang, and S. Chang. Image retrieval: current techniques, promising directions and open issues. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 10(4):39–62, April 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    T. Ruotsalo and E. Hyvönen. An event-based method for making heterogeneous metadata schemas and annotations semantically interoperable. In Proceedings of ISWC 2007 + ASWC 2007, Busan, Korea, pages 409–422. Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    T. Ruotsalo and E. Hyvönen. A method for determining ontology-based semantic relevance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications DEXA 2007, Regensburg, Germany. Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    G. M. Sacco. Dynamic taxonomies: guided interactive diagnostic assistance. In N. Wickramasinghe, editor, Encyclopedia of Healthcare Information Systems. Idea Group, 2005.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    G. Schreiber, A. Amin, M. van Assem, V. de Boer, L. Hardman, M. Hildebrand, L. Hollink, Z. Huang, J. van Kersen, M. de Niet, B. Omelayenko, J. van Ossenbruggen, R. Siebes, J. Taekema, J. Wielemaker, and B. Wielinga. MultimediaN E-Culture demonstrator. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2006), pages 951–958. Springer, November 2006.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    A. Sheth, B. Aleman-Meza, I. B. Arpinar, C. Bertram, Y. Warke, C. Ramakrishnan, C. Halaschek, K. Anyanwu, D. Avant, F. S. Arpinar, and K. Kochut. Semantic association identification and knowledge discovery for national security applications. Journal of Database Management on Database Technology, 16(1):33–53, Jan–Mar 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    T. Sidoroff and E. Hyvönen. Semantic e-goverment portals — a case study. In Proceedings of the ISWC-2005 Workshop Semantic Web Case Studies and Best Practices for eBusiness SWCASE05, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol 155, http://ceur-ws.org Nov 2005.
  51. 51.
    S. Sirmakessis, editor. Adaptive and Personalized Semantic Web. Springer, Berlin, 2006.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    J. Sowa. Knowledge Representation. Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. Brooks/Cole, 2000.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    S. Staab, J. Angele, S. Decker, M. Erdmann, A. Hotho, A. Maedche, H.-P. Schnurr, R. Studer, and Y. Sure. Semantic Community Web Portals. In Proceedings of the 9th International World Wide Web Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, May 2000. Elsevier.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    O. Suominen, K. Viljanen, and E. Hyvönen. User-centric faceted search for semantic portals. In Proceedings of the 4th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2007), Innsbruck, Austria, pages 356–370. Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    M. van Assem, V. Malaise, A. Miles, and G. Schreiber. A method to convert thesauri to SKOS. In Proceedings of the Third European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2006). Springer, 2006.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    M. van Assem, M. R. Menken, G. Schreiber, J. Wielemaker, and B. Wielinga. A method for converting thesauri to RDF/OWL. In Proceedings of 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2004), Hiroshima, Japan. Springer, 2004.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    J. van Ossenbruggen, A. Amin, L. Hardman, M. Hildebrand, M. van Assem, B. Omelayenko, G. Schreiber, A. Tordai, V. de Boer, B. Wielinga, J. Wielemaker, M. de Niet, J. Taekema, M.-F. van Orsouw, and A. Teesing. Searching and Annotating Virtual Heritage Collections with Semantic-Web Techniques. In Proceedings of Museums and the Web 2007, San Francisco, California, March 2007. Archives and Museum Informatics.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    K. Viljanen, T. Känsälä, E. Hyvönen, and E. Mäkelä. ONTODELLA – a projection and linking service for semantic web applications. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2006), Krakow, Poland. IEEE, September 4–8 2006.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    K. Viljanen, J. Tuominen, T. Känsälä, and E. Hyvönen. Distributed semantic content creation and publication for cultural heritage legacy systems. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Distibuted Human-Machine Systems, Athens, Greece. IEEE, 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Semantic Computing Research GroupHelsinki University of Technology (TKK) and University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations