Ontology Engineering Environments

  • Riichiro MizoguchiEmail author
  • Kouji Kozaki
Part of the International Handbooks on Information Systems book series (INFOSYS)


In this chapter we discuss trends of ontology engineering environments and their characteristics through comparison between some tools. After a summarization of the recent trends of them, the authors enumerate factors which characterize those environments. Then we take up OntoEdit, Hozo, WebODE, SWOOP and Protégé, and compare them according to the factors.


Ontology Development Ontology Engineering Ontology Server Ontology Alignment Ontology Editor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Corcho O, Fernandez-Lopez M, Gómez-Pérez A, Vicente O (2002) WebODE: An Integrated Workbench for Ontology Representation, Reasoning and Exchange, Proc. of EKAW2002, Springer LNAI 2473: 138–153.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Decker S, Erdmann M, Fensel D, Studer R (1999) Ontobroker: Ontology Based Access to Distributed and Semi-structured Information: 351–369.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duineveld A, Weiden M, Kenepa B, Benjamis R (1999) WonderTools? A Comparative Study of Ontological Engineering Tools. Proc. of KAW99.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fernandez-Lopez M, Gómez-Pérez A, Pazos Sierra J (1999) Building a Chemical Ontology Using Methontology and the Ontology Design Environment, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(1): 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fernandez-Lopez M, Gómez-Pérez A, (2002) The Integration of OntoClearn in WebODE, Proc. of the 1st Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (EON2002): 38–52.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gómez-Pérez A, Angele J, Fernandez-Lopez, et al. (2002) A Survey on Ontology Tools. OntoWeb Deliverable 1.3, Universidad Politecnia de Madrid.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gómez-Pérez A, González-Cabero R, Manuel Lama (2004) ODE SWS: A Framework for Designing and Composing Semantic Web Services, IEEE Intelligent Systems 19(4): 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gruninger R, Fox M (1994) The Design and Evaluation of Ontologies for Enterprise Engineering, Proc. of Comparison of implemented ontology: 105–128.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hayes P, Eskridge T C, Mehrotra M, et al. (2005) COE: Tools for Collaborative Ontology Development and Reuse, Proc. of K-CAP2005.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kalyanpur A, Parsia B, Sirin E, Cuenca-Grau B, Hendler J (2005) Swoop: A ‘Web’ Ontology Editing Browser, Journal of Web Semantics 4(2).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kalyanpur A, Parsia B, Sirin E, Hendler J (2005) Debugging Unsatisfiable Classes in OWL Ontologies, Journal of Web Semantics 3(4).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kozaki K, et al. (2000) Development of an Environment for Building Ontologies Which is Based on a Fundamental Consideration of “Relationship” and “Role”, Proc. of the Sixth Pacific Knowledge Acquisition Workshop (PKAW2000): 205–221.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kozaki K, Kitamura Y, Ikeda M, Mizoguchi R (2002) Hozo: An Environment for Building/Using Ontologies Based on a Fundamental Consideration of “Role” and “Relationship”, Proc. of EKAW2002: 213–218.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knublauch H, Fergerson R W, et al. (2004) The Protégé OWL Plugin: An Open Development Environment for Semantic Web Applications, Proc. of ISWC 2004: 229–243.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mizoguchi R, Kozaki K, Sano T, Kitamura Y (2000) Construction and Deployment of a Plant Ontology, Proc. of EKAW2000: 113–128.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mizoguchi R, et al. (2007) A Model of Roles in Ontology Development Tool: Hozo, Journal of Ontological Analysis and Conceptual Modeling, 2(2): 159–179.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Musen M A, Fergerson R W, Grosso W E, Crubezy M, Eriksson H, et al. (2003) The Evolution of Protégé: An Environment for Knowledge-Based Systems Development, International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 58(1): 89–123.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Noy N F, Musen M A (2000) PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment, Proc. of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2000): 450–455.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Noy N, Chugh A, Liu W, Musen M (2006) A Framework for Ontology Evolution in Collaborative Environments, Proc. of ISWC2006, LNCS 4273: 544–558.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roitman H, Gal A (2006) OntoBuilder: Fully Automatic Extraction and Consolidation of Ontologies from Web Sources Using Sequence Semantics. Proc. of EDBT Workshops 2006: 573–576.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sunagawa E, Kozaki K et al. (2003) An Environment for Distributed Ontology Development Based on Dependency Management, Proc. of ISWC2003: 453–468.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sure Y, Staab S, Angele J (2002) OntoEdit: Guiding Ontology Development by Methodology and Inferencing, Proc. of the Confederated International Conferences CoopIS, DOA and ODBASE: 1205–1222.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sure Y, Staab S, Erdmann M, et al. (2002) OntoEdit: Collaborative Ontology Development for the Semantic web, Proc. of ISWC2002: 221–235.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Institute of Scientific and Industrial ResearchOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations