ISAAC 2008: Algorithms and Computation pp 183-195 | Cite as

A Game Theoretic Approach for Efficient Graph Coloring

  • Panagiota N. Panagopoulou
  • Paul G. Spirakis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5369)

Abstract

We give an efficient local search algorithm that computes a good vertex coloring of a graph G. In order to better illustrate this local search method, we view local moves as selfish moves in a suitably defined game. In particular, given a graph G = (V,E) of n vertices and m edges, we define the graph coloring game Γ(G) as a strategic game where the set of players is the set of vertices and the players share the same action set, which is a set of n colors. The payoff that a vertex v receives, given the actions chosen by all vertices, equals the total number of vertices that have chosen the same color as v, unless a neighbor of v has also chosen the same color, in which case the payoff of v is 0. We show:
  • The game Γ(G) has always pure Nash equilibria. Each pure equilibrium is a proper coloring of G. Furthermore, there exists a pure equilibrium that corresponds to an optimum coloring.

  • We give a polynomial time algorithm \(\mathcal{A}\) which computes a pure Nash equilibrium of Γ(G).

  • The total number, k, of colors used in any pure Nash equilibrium (and thus achieved by \(\mathcal{A}\)) is \(k\leq\min\{\Delta_2+1, \frac{n+\omega}{2}, \frac{1+\sqrt{1+8m}}{2}, n-\alpha+1\}\), where ω, α are the clique number and the independence number of G and Δ 2 is the maximum degree that a vertex can have subject to the condition that it is adjacent to at least one vertex of equal or greater degree. (Δ 2 is no more than the maximum degree Δ of G.)

  • Thus, in fact, we propose here a new, efficient coloring method that achieves a number of colors satisfying (together) the known general upper bounds on the chromatic number χ. Our method is also an alternative general way of proving, constructively, all these bounds.

  • Finally, we show how to strengthen our method (staying in polynomial time) so that it avoids “bad” pure Nash equilibria (i.e. those admitting a number of colors k far away from χ). In particular, we show that our enhanced method colors optimally dense random q-partite graphs (of fixed q) with high probability.

Keywords

Chromatic Number Graph Coloring Local Search Method Strategic Game Independence Number 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bodlaender, H.L.: On the complexity of some coloring games. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science 2(2), 133–147 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bollbás, B.: The chromatic number of random graphs. Combinatorica 8, 49–55 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brelaz, D.: New methods to color the vertices of a graph. Comm. ACM 22, 251–256 (1979)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brooks, R.L.: On colouring the nodes of a network. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 37, 194–197 (1941)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diestel, R.: Graph Theory. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dinski, T., Zhu, X.: A bound for the game chromatic number of graphs. Discrete Mathematics 196, 109–115 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feige, U., Kilian, J.: Zero knowledge and the chromatic number. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 57(2), 187–199 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Halldórsson, M.: A still better performance guarantee for approximate graph coloring. Information Processing Letters 45, 19–23 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harary, F.: Graph theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1969)MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harary, F., Tuza, Z.: Two graph-colouring games. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society 48, 141–149 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoeffding, W.: Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 13–30 (1963)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jensen, T.R., Toft, B.: Graph Coloring Problems. Wiley Interscience, Hoboken (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karp, R.M.: Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In: Complexity of Computer Computations, pp. 85–103. Plenum Press (1972)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Monderer, D., Shapley, L.S.: Potential games. Games and Economic Behavior 14, 124–143 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nash, J.F.: Non-cooperative games. Annals of Mathematics 54(2), 286–295 (1951)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stacho, L.: New upper bounds for the chromatic number of a graph. Journal of Graph Theory 36(2), 117–120 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panagiota N. Panagopoulou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paul G. Spirakis
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Computer Engineering and Informatics DepartmentUniversity of PatrasGreece
  2. 2.Research Academic Computer Technology InstituteUniversity of PatrasRionGreece

Personalised recommendations