Advertisement

Spatial Self-Organization in Networks of Things

  • Kashif Zia
  • Alois Ferscha
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5343)

Abstract

Miniaturized, wirelessly networked embedded systems combined with Peer-to-Peer computing principles have started to pervade into objects of everyday use, like tools, appliances or the environment, thus implementing ensembles of autonomous, interacting “networked things”. With the development of the Peer-it framework, integrating a self-contained, miniaturized, universal and scalable embedded systems hardware platform, basically containing sensors, actuators, computing and wireless communication facilities, and a Peer-to-Peer (P2P) based software architecture, we have proposed a “stick-on” solution for the implementation of networks of things (NoTs). The Peer-it design and miniaturization ultimately aim to yield a “smart label”, ready to be sticked on to literally every “thing” as a NoT enabler. The paper addresses the issue of spatial awareness of objects within NoTs, and proposes abstractions of space based on (i) topology, (ii) distance and (iii) orientation. Experiments are conducted to investigate on the ability of objects in a NoT to self-organize based on their spatial orientation.

Keywords

Autonomic Computing Sensor/Actuator Systems Context Awareness Self-organization Spatial Abstraction Networks of Things 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ferscha, A., et al.: Peer-it: Stick-on solutions for networks of things. Das, S.K., Contri, M., Shirazi, B. (eds.) Pervasive and Mobile Computing Journal 4(3), 448–479 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferscha, A., et al.: Building Flexible Manufacturing Systems Based on Peer-its. Embedded Systems Design in Intelligent Industrial Automation, EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems (October 2007) (special issue) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gervasi, V., Prencipe, G.: Flocking by a set of autonomous mobile robots. Technical report TR-01-21, University of Pisa (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mataric, M., Zordan, V., Williamson, M.: Making complex articulated agents dance: an analysis of control methods drawn from robotics, animation and biology. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 2(1), 23–44 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reynolds, C.W.: Flocks, herds and schools: a distributed behavioral model. Computer Graphics 21(4), 25–34 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mondada, F., Guignard, A., Bonani, M., Floreano, D., Bar, D., Lauria, M.: Swarm-bot: from concept to implementation. In: Lee, G., Yuj, J. (eds.) Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robot and Systems, pp. 1626–1631 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kashif Zia
    • 1
  • Alois Ferscha
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Pervasive ComputingJohannes Kepler University LinzAustria

Personalised recommendations