ISICA 2008: Advances in Computation and Intelligence pp 740-749 | Cite as
Multi-Classifier Systems (MCSs) of Remote Sensing Imagery Classification Based on Texture Analysis
Abstract
This article concerns methods of improving the accuracy of land cover maps using Very High-resolution Satellites (VHRS).It discusses two methods for increasing the accuracy of classifiers used in land cover mapping. One is texture analysis using GLCM method and the other is multiple classifier system (MCSs) using voting rules. A case study of QuickBird Imagery of an area in Chenggong County of Yunnan Province is conducted based on an analysis of QuickBird imagery. The experiment results show that these two methods can improve the accuracy greatly. The applying of texture bands makes an increase of 2.6816%, and the MCSs make an increase of 3.9512%.
Keywords
multiple classifier system (MCSs) co-occurrence probability texture analysis land-cover classificationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Clausi, D.A., Zhao, Y.: Rapid extraction of image texture by co-occurrence using a hybrid data structure. Computer & Geosciences, 763–774 (2002)Google Scholar
- 2.Hay, G.J., Niemann, K.O., McLean, G.F.: An object-specific image-texture analysis of H-Resolution Forest Imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 55, 108–122 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Giacinto, G., Roli, F.: An approach to the automatic design of multiple classifier systems. Pattern Recognition letters 22, 25–33 (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 4.Wang, L., Liu, J.: Texture classification using multi-resolution Markov random field models. Pattern Recognition letters 20, 171–182 (1999)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 5.Brian, M., Steele: Combining Multiple Classifiers: An Application Using Spatial and Remotely Sensed Information for Land Cover Type Mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment 74, 545–556 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Berberoglu, S., Curran, P.J., Lloyd, C.D., Atkinson, P.M.: Texture classification of Mediterranean land cover. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geo-information 9, 322–334 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Jing, Y.: The application of land-use classification for high resolution remote sensing image based on space characteristic. A Dissertation Submitted to China university of Geosciences for the Degree of Doctor of EngineeringGoogle Scholar
- 8.Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K., Dinstein, I.: Texture features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 3, 610–625 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Kayitakire, F., Hamel, C., Defourny, P.: Retrieving forest structure variables based on image texture analysis and IKONOS-2 imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 102, 391–401 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Aguera, F., Aguilar, F.J., Aguilar, M.A.: Using texture analysis to improve per-pixel classification of very high resolution images for mapping plastic greenhouses. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing (2008) doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2008.03.003Google Scholar
- 11.Johansen, K., Coops, N.C., Gergel, S.E., Stange, Y.: Application of high spatial resolution satellite imagery for riparian and forest ecosystem classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 110, 29–44 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Wang, L., Soursa, W.P., Gong, P., Biging, G.S.: Comparison of IKONOS and QuickBird images for mapping mangrove species on the Caribbean coast of Panama. Remote Sensing of Environment 91, 432–440 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Lowry, J., Ramsey, R.D., Thomas, K., et al.: Mapping moderate-scale land-cover over large geographic areas within a collaborative framework: A case study of the Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project(SWReGAP). Remote Sensing of Environment 108, 59–73 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Fukunaga, K., Hayes, R.R.: Effects of sample size in classifier design. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11, 873–885 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Hughes, G.: On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers. Information Theory 4, 55–63 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Lee Daniel, D., Sebastian, S.H.: Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401, 788–791 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Yunhao, C., Peijun, S., Xiaobing, L., et al.: A combined approach for estimating vegetation cover in urban/suburban environments from remotely sensed data. Computer & Geosciences 32(9), 1299–1309 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Xu, L., Krzyzak, A., Suen, C.Y.: Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics 22(3), 418–435 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Kittler, J., Hatef, M., Duin, R.P.W., et al.: On combining classifiers. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20(3), 226–239 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Vapnik Vladimir, N.: The Nature of Statistical Learning theory, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2000)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 21.Vapnik, V.N.: An overview of statistical learning theory. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 10(5), 988–999 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Hunter, E.L., Power, C.H.: An assessment of two classification methods for mapping Thames Estuary intertribal habitats using CASI data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23(15), 2989–3008 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Settle, J.J., Drake, N.: Linear mixing and the estimation of ground cover proportions. International Journal of Remote Sensing 14(6), 1159–2277 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Wu, T.F., Lin, C.J., Weng, R.C.: Probability estimates for multi-class classification by pairwise coupling. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 5, 975–1005 (2004)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 25.Khotanzad, A., Kashyap, R.: Feature selection for texture recognition based on image synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 17, 1087–1095 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Tuceryan, M., Jain, A.K.: Texture Analysis. Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision, 235–276 (1993)Google Scholar