Ontologies for Production Automation

  • Jose L. Martinez Lastra
  • Ivan M. Delamer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4891)

Abstract

The manufacturing sector is currently under pressures to swiftly accommodate new products by quickly setting up new factories or retrofitting existing ones. In order to achieve this goal, engineering tasks currently performed manually need to be automated. In this scenario, ontologies emerge as a candidate solution for representing knowledge about manufacturing processes, equipment, and products in a machine-interpretable way. This knowledge can then be used by automated problem-solving methods to (re)configure the control software that coordinates and supervises manufacturing systems. This chapter reviews current approaches to use ontologies in the manufacturing domain, which include use for vocabulary definition in multi-agent systems and use for describing processes using Semantic Web Services. In addition, current and emerging research trends are identified.

References

  1. 1.
    Mehrabi, M.G., Ulsoy, A.G., Koren, Y.: Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: Key to future manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 11(4), 403–419 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schlenoff, C., Grüninger, M., Tissot, F., Valois, J., Lubell, J., Lee, J.: The Process Specification Language (PSL): Overview and Version 1.0 Specification. NISTIR 6459, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents: FIPA Ontology Service Specification Geneva, Switzerland (2001), http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00086/XC00086D.html
  4. 4.
    Obitko, M., Marik, V.: Ontologies for Multi-Agent Systems in Manufacturing Domain. In: Hameurlain, A., Cicchetti, R., Traunmüller, R. (eds.) DEXA 2002. LNCS, vol. 2453, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Obitko, M., Mařík, V.: Integrating Transportation Ontologies. In: Mařík, V., William Brennan, R., Pěchouček, M. (eds.) HoloMAS 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3593, pp. 99–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borgo, S., Leitao, P.: Foundations for a core Ontology of Manufacturing. In: Kishore, R., Ramesh, R., Sharman, R. (eds.) Ontologies: A Handbook of Principles, Concepts and Applications in Information Systems. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lohse, N.: Towards an Ontology Framework for the Integrated Design of Modular Assembly Systems. Doctoral Thesis, University of Nottingham (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schreiber, G., Wielinga, B., de Hoog, R., Akkermans, H., Van de Velde, W.: CommonKADS: A Comprehensive Methodology for KBS Development. IEEE Expert, 28–37 (December 1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Delamer, I.M.: Event-based Middleware for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems: A Semantic Web Services Approach. Doctoral dissertation No. 631, Tampere University of Texhnology, Finland (2006) ISBN 952-15-1672-0Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The OWL Services Coalition: OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. DAML-S Home Page (2007), http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/
  11. 11.
    Deutsches Institute für Normung e.V., Manufacturing Processes Joining, DIN 8593 Parts 0-8 (2003) (in German)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vos, J.A.W.M.: Module and System Design in Flexibly Automated Assembly. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Holland, W., Bronsvoort, W.F.: Assembly Features in modeling and planning. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 16, 277–294 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martinez Lastra, J.L.: Reference Mechatronic Architecture for Actor-based Assembly Systems. Doctoral dissertation No. 484, Tampere University of Technology, Finland (2004) ISBN 952-15-1210-5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jose L. Martinez Lastra
  • Ivan M. Delamer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations