ROC: A Method for Proto-ontology Construction by Domain Experts

  • Nicole J. J. P. Koenderink
  • Mark van Assem
  • J. Lars Hulzebos
  • Jeen Broekstra
  • Jan L. Top
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5367)

Abstract

Ontology construction is a labour-intensive and costly process. Even though many formal and semi-formal vocabularies are available, creating an ontology for a specific application is hindered in a number of ways. Firstly, the process of elicitating concepts is a time consuming and strenuous process. Secondly, it is difficult to keep focus. Thirdly, technical modelling constructs are hard to understand for the uninitiated. We propose ROC as a method to cope with these problems. ROC builds on well-known approaches for ontology construction. However, we reuse existing sources to generate a repository of proposed associations. ROC assists in efficiently putting forward all relevant concepts and relations by providing a large set of potential candidate associations. Secondly, rather than using intermediate representations of formal constructs we confront the domain expert with ‘natural-language-like’ statements generated from RDF-based triples. Moreover, we strictly separate the roles of problem owner, domain expert and knowledge engineer, each having his own responsibilities and skills. The domain expert and problem owner keep focus by monitoring a well-defined application purpose. We have implemented an initial set of tools to support ROC. This paper describes the ROC method and two application cases in which we evaluate the overall approach.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering. In: Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Juristo, N.: Methontology: From ontological art towards ontological engineering. In: AAAI Ontological Engineering: Papers from the 1997 Spring Symposium. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Knublauch, H., Fergerson, R.W., Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: The protégé owl plugin: An open development environment for semantic web applications. In: 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaljurand, K., Fuchs, N.E.: Bidirectional mapping between OWL DL and attempto controlled english. In: Alferes, J.J., Bailey, J., May, W., Schwertel, U. (eds.) PPSWR 2006. LNCS, vol. 4187, pp. 179–189. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hart, G., Johnson, M., Dolbear, C.: Rabbit: Developing a control natural language for authoring ontologies. In: 5th European Semantic Web Conference (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Funk, A., Tablan, V., Bontcheva, K., Cunningham, H., Davis, B., Handschuh, S.: CLOnE: Controlled Language for Ontology Editing. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.-S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.-I., Nixon, L., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 142–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schreiber, G., Akkermans, H., Anjewierden, A., De Hoog, R., Shadbolt, N., Van de Velde, W., Wielinga, B.: Knowledge Engineering and Management – The CommonKADS Methodology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hu, W., Qu, Y.: Discovering simple mappings between relational database schemas and ontologies. In: International Semantic Web Conference, pp. 225–238 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Noy, N., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koenderink, N., Top, J., van Vliet, L.: Expert-based ontology construction: a case study in horticulture. In: TAKMA workshop at the DEXA conference (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haverkort, A., Top, J.L., Verdenius, F.: Organizing data in arable farming: towards an ontology of processing potato. Potato Research 49, 177–201 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoser, B., Hotho, A., Jäschke, R., Schmitz, C., Stumme, G.: Semantic network analysis of ontologies. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 514–529. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole J. J. P. Koenderink
    • 1
  • Mark van Assem
    • 2
  • J. Lars Hulzebos
    • 1
  • Jeen Broekstra
    • 1
  • Jan L. Top
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Agrotechnology & Food Innovations B.V.Wageningen URWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Faculty of SciencesVrije Universiteit AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations