Advertisement

Using Agent-Based Simulation of Human Behavior to Reduce Evacuation Time

  • Arief Rahman
  • Ahmad Kamil Mahmood
  • Etienne Schneider
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5357)

Abstract

Human factors play a significant part in the time taken to evacuate due to an emergency. An agent-based simulation, using the Prometheus methodology (SEEP 1.5), has been developed to study the complex behavior of human (the ‘agents’) in high-rise building evacuations. In the case of hostel evacuations, simulation results show that pre-evacuation phase takes 60.4% of Total Evacuation Time (TET). The movement phase (including queuing time) only takes 39.6% of TET. From sensitivity analysis, it can be shown that a reduction in TET by 41.2% can be achieved by improving the recognition phase. Emergency exit signs have been used as smart agents. Modified Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) was used to determine the feasibility of the evacuation routes. Both wayfinding methods, the ‘familiarity of environment’, which is the most natural method, and the ACO method have been simulated and comparisons were made. In scenario 1, where there were no obstacles, both methods achieved the same TET. However, in scenario 2, where an obstacle was present, the TET for the ACO wayfinding method was 21.6% shorter than the one for the ‘familiarity’ wayfinding method.

Keywords

Evacuation planning Prometheus methodology multi-agent simulation Ant Colony Optimization cognitive behavior 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lo, S., Fang, Z., Zhi, G., Yuen, K.: A computer simulation model of emergency egress for space planners. Journal of Facilities (Emerald) 20, 266–270 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson, C.: Lessons from the evacuation of the WTC, September 11th 2001 for the development of computer-based simulations. Cognition, Technology & Work Journal 7, 214–240 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gwynne, S., Galea, E.R., Owen, M., Lawrence, P.J., Filippidis, L.: A review of the methodologies used in computer simulation of evacuation from the built environment. Journal of Building and Environment 34, 741–749 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pan, X., Han, C.S., Dauber, K., Law, K.H.: Human and social behavior in computational modeling and analysis of egress. Journal of automation in construction 15, 448–461 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Purser, D., Bensilum, M.: Quantification of behaviour for engineering design standards and escape time calculations 38, 157–182 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pires, T.: An approach for modeling human cognitive behavior in evacuation models. Fire safety journal 40, 177–189 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Proulx, G.: Evacuation time and movement in apartment buildings. Fire Safety Journal 24, 229–246 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lo, S.M., Huang, H.C., Wang, P., Yuen, K.K.: A game theory based exit selection model for evacuation. Fire Safety Journal 41, 364–369 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pelechano, N., Badler, N.I.: Modelling crowd and trained leader behavior during building evacuation, pp. 80–85. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murakami, Y., Minami, K., Kawasoe, T., Ishida, T.: Multi-agent simulation for crisis management. In: Proceeding of the IEEE workshop on knowledge media networking. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olsson, P., Regan, M.: A comparison between actual and predicted evacuation times 38, 138–145 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sugimoto, Y.: Modeling action rules through participatory simulation in virtual space. Master Thesis, Kyoto University, Japan (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chow, W.: "Waiting time" for evacuation in crowded areas. Journal of Building and Management Journal 42, 3757–3761 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thomson, P.A., Marchant, E.W.: A computer model for the evacuation of large building populations. Fire Safety Journal 24, 131–148 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Helbing, D., Farkas, I., Vicsek, T.: Simulating dynamical features of escape panic 407, 487–490 (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Proulx, G.: Evacuation time and movement in apartment buildings. Fire Safety Journal 24, 229–246 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Padgham, L., Winikoff, M.: Developing intelligent agent systems, a practical guide. In: West Sussex. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tran, Q., Low, G.: Comparison of ten agent-oriented methodologies. In: Henderson, B., Giorgini, P. (eds.) Agent-Oriented Methodologies. Idea group publishing, Hershey (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Al-Hashel, E., Balachandran, B., Sharma, D.: A comparison of three agent-oriented software development methodologies: ROADMAP, Prometheus, and MaSE. In: Apolloni, B., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L. (eds.) KES 2007, Part III. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4694, pp. 909–916. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    RMIT Intelligent Agents Group, www.cs.rmit.edu.au/agents/pdt/
  21. 21.
    Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., Colorni, A.: Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 26(1) (1996)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rahman, A., Kamil, A.: Feasible route determination using ant colony algorithm in evacuation planning. In: ScoRed 2007. IEEE, Malaysia (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kisko, T.: EVACNET4 - A program to determine the minimum building evacuation time. University of Florida (1999), http://www.ise.ufl.edu/kisko/files/evacnet/
  24. 24.
    Proulx, G.: Evacuation time and movement in apartment buildings. Fire Safety Journal 24, 229–246 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gwynne, S., Galea, E., Owen, M., Lawrence, P.J., Filippidis, L.: A systematic comparison of buildingEXODUS predictions with experimental data from the Stapelfeldt trials and the Milburn House evacuation. Applied mathematical modelling 29, 818–851 (2005)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arief Rahman
    • 1
  • Ahmad Kamil Mahmood
    • 1
  • Etienne Schneider
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Information ScienceUniversiti Teknologi PETRONASTronohMalaysia

Personalised recommendations