Advertisement

Applying the Logic of Multiple-Valued Argumentation to Social Web: SNS and Wikipedia

  • Shusuke Kuribara
  • Safia Abbas
  • Hajime Sawamura
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5357)

Abstract

The Logic of Multiple-Valued Argumentation (LMA) is an argumentation framework that allows for argument-based reasoning about uncertain issues under uncertain knowledge. In this paper, we describe its applications to Social Web: SNS and Wikipedia. They are said to be the most influential social Web applications to the present and future information society. For SNS, we present an agent that judges the registration approval for Mymixi in mixi in terms of LMA. For Wikipedia, we focus on the deletion problem of Wikipedia and present agents that argue about the issue on whether contributed articles should be deleted or not, analyzing arguments proposed for deletion in terms of LMA. These attempts reveal that LMA can deal with not only potential applications but also practical ones such as extensive and contemporary applications.

Keywords

Argumentation Logic of Multiple-Valued Argumentation Social Web SNS Wikipedia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    My Space! Japan, http://jp.myspace.com/
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Amazon! Japan, http://www.amazon.co.jp/
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Takahashi, T., Sawamura, H.: A logic of multiple-valued argumentation. In: Proceedings of the third international joint conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), pp. 800–807. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sawamura, H., Wakaki, T., Nitta, K.: The logic of multiple-valued argumentation and its applications to web technology. In: Dunne, P.E., Bench-Capon, T.J.M. (eds.) Computational Models of Argument, pp. 291–296. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chesñevar, C.I., Maguitman, G., Loui, R.P.: Logical models of argument. ACM Computing Surveys 32, 337–383 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.: Logical systems for defeasible argumentation. In: Gabbay, D., Guenther, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, pp. 219–318. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reed, C., Norman, T.J. (eds.): Argumentation Machines. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abbas, S., Sawamura, H.: Towards argument mining from relational argument database. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int. Workshop on Juris-Informatics (JURISIN 2008) Workshop, pp. 22–31 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Takahashi, Y., Sawamura, H., Zhang, J.: Transforming natural arguments in araucaria to formal arguments in lma. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, pp. 668–678. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chesñevar, C.I., McGinnis, J., Modgil, S., Rahwan, I., Reed, C., Simari, G., South, M., Vreeswijk, G., Willmott, S.: Towards an argument interchange format. The Knowledge Engineering Review 21, 293–316 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shusuke Kuribara
    • 1
  • Safia Abbas
    • 1
  • Hajime Sawamura
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of Science and TechnologyNiigata UniversityNiigataJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Science and Technology, Academic AssemblyNiigata UniversityNiigataJapan

Personalised recommendations