From Obligations to Organizational Structures in Multi-Agent Systems

  • J. Octavio Gutiérrez-García
  • Jean-Luc Koning
  • Félix F. Ramos-Corchado
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5357)

Abstract

The achievement of common objectives in multi-agent systems is only possible through interaction and coordination; in order to implement both aspects in a effective manner, rules to direct the behavior of a group of agents are necessary, however, existing rules are usually static, inflexible, and inappropriate for large systems, where dynamic interaction takes place. We propose modeling agent behavior by means of obligations, utilized as social norms, delineating agents’ roles as independent components, which can be grouped into organizational structures. Moreover, such organizations can be deployed on a service oriented platform, where the composition of organizations leads to the creation of new services.

Keywords

Multi-agent systems interaction protocols social norms 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Artikis, A., Sergot, M., Pitt, J.: Specifying Norm-Governed Computational Societies. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boella, G., Van der Torre, L.W.N.: A game theoretic approach to contracts in multiagent systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C 36(1), 68–79 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carabelea, C., Boissier, O.: Coordinating Agents in Organizations Using Social Commitments. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 150(3), 73–91 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castelfranchi, C.: Commitment: from intentions to groups and organizations. In: Proceedings of ICMAS 1995, pp. 41–48. AAAI-MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chopra, A.K., Singh, M.P.: Contextualizing commitment protocol. In: AAMAS 2006, pp. 1345–1352. ACM Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dignum, V., Meyer, J.-J., Weigand, H., Dignum, F.: An organization-oriented model for agent societies. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Regulated Agent-Based Social Systems: Theories and Applications at AAMAS 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kowalski, R., Sergot, M.: A logic-based calculus of events. New Generation Computing 4(1), 67–95 (1986)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mallya, A.U., Singh, M.P.: An algebra for commitment protocols. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 14(2), 143–163 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shanahan, M.P.: The event calculus explained. In: Veloso, M.M., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence Today. LNCS, vol. 1600, pp. 409–430. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yolum, P., Singh, M.P.: Flexible protocol specification and execution: applying event calculus planning using commitments. In: AAMAS 2002, pp. 527–534. ACM Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Octavio Gutiérrez-García
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jean-Luc Koning
    • 1
  • Félix F. Ramos-Corchado
    • 2
  1. 1.LCIS Research LaboratoryGrenoble Institute of TechnologyValence Cedex 9France
  2. 2.Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPNUnidad GuadalajaraJaliscoMéxico

Personalised recommendations