Advertisement

Changing Institutional Goals and Beliefs of Autonomous Agents

  • Guido Boella
  • Leendert van der Torre
  • Serena Villata
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5357)

Abstract

Agents are autonomous and thus their goals and beliefs cannot be changed by other agents or the environment, but from outside the agents we can change their institutional goals and beliefs, that is, the responsibilities and powers associated with their roles. In this paper, we introduce a model of institutional dynamics, where the dynamics of an institution is modeled by the creation or removal of responsibilities and powers. We illustrate the change of institutional goals and beliefs using a government scenario.

Keywords

Prime Minister Multiagent System Autonomous Agent Institutional Power Dependence Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boella, G., Sauro, L., van der Torre, L.: From social power to social importance. In: Web Intelligence and Agent Systems, pp. 393–404. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Power in Norm Negotiation. In: Nguyen, N.T., Grzech, A., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES-AMSTA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4496, pp. 436–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boella, G., van der Torre, L., Villata, S.: Social Viewpoints for Arguing about Coalitions. In: Proceedings of PRIMA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5357. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bogdanovych, A., Esteva, M., Simoff, S., Sierra, C., Berger, H.: A Methodology for Developing multiagent Systems as 3D Electronic Institutions. In: Luck, M., Padgham, L. (eds.) Agent-Oriented Software Engineering VIII. LNCS, vol. 4951, pp. 103–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bou, E., Lopez-Sanchez, M., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J.A.: Adaptation of Automatic Electronic Institutions Through Norms and Institutional Agents. In: O’Hare, G.M.P., Ricci, A., O’Grady, M.J., Dikenelli, O. (eds.) ESAW 2006. LNCS, vol. 4457, pp. 300–319. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bresciani, P., Perini, A., Giorgini, P., Giunchiglia, F., Mylopoulos, J.: Tropos: An Agent-Oriented Software Development Methodology. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Journal 8, 203–236 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Caire, P., Villata, S., van der Torre, L., Boella, G.: Conviviality Masks in Role-Based Institutions Multi-Agent Teleconferencing in Virtual Worlds. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2008, pp. 1265–1268 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castelfranchi, C.: The micro-macro constitution of power. Protosociology 18, 208–269 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grossi, D.: Designing Invisible Handcuffs: Formal Investigations in Institutions and Organizations for Multi-agent Systems, PhD Thesis, SIKS Dissertation Series 2007-16 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones, A.J.I., Sergot, M.: A Formal Characterization of Institutionalised Power. Logic Journal of IGPL (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sichman, J.S., Conte, R.: Multi-agent dependence by dependence graphs. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2002, pp. 483–490 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sierra, C., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J.A., Noriega, P., Arcos, J.L., Esteva, M.: Engineering multi-agent systems as electronic institutions. European Journal for the Informatics Professional 5, 33–39 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N., Wooldridge, M.: Developing multiagent systems: The Gaia methodology. IEEE Transactions of Software Engineering and Methodology 12, 317–370 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guido Boella
    • 1
  • Leendert van der Torre
    • 2
  • Serena Villata
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversity of TurinItaly
  2. 2.Computer Science and CommunicationUniversity of LuxembourgLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations