Decidable and Undecidable Fragments of Halpern and Shoham’s Interval Temporal Logic: Towards a Complete Classification
Interval temporal logics are based on temporal structures where time intervals, rather than time instants, are the primitive ontological entities. They employ modal operators corresponding to various relations between intervals, known as Allen’s relations. Technically, validity in interval temporal logics translates to dyadic second-order logic, thus explaining their complex computational behavior. The full modal logic of Allen’s relations, called HS, has been proved to be undecidable by Halpern and Shoham under very weak assumptions on the class of interval structures, and this result was discouraging attempts for practical applications and further research in the field. A renewed interest has been recently stimulated by the discovery of interesting decidable fragments of HS. This paper contributes to the characterization of the boundary between decidability and undecidability of HS fragments. It summarizes known positive and negative results, it describes the main techniques applied so far in both directions, and it establishes a number of new undecidability results for relatively small fragments of HS.
KeywordsLinear Order Linear Time Temporal Logic Tiling Problem Interval Structure Interval Logic
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Börger, E., Grädel, E., Gurevich, Y.: The Classical Decision Problem. In: Perspectives of Mathematical Logic. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
- 3.Bresolin, D., Goranko, V., Montanari, A., Sala, P.: Tableau-based Decision Procedure for the Logic of Proper Subinterval Structures over Dense Orderings. In: Areces, C., Demri, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Methods for Modalities (M4M), pp. 335–351 (2007)Google Scholar
- 5.Bresolin, D., Goranko, V., Montanari, A., Sala, P.: Tableau-based decision procedures for the logics of subinterval structures over dense orderings. In: Journal of Logic and Computation (to appear, 2008)Google Scholar
- 7.Bresolin, D., Goranko, V., Montanari, A., Sciavicco, G.: Propositional Interval Neighborhood Logics: Expressiveness, Decidability, and Undecidable Extensions. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic (to appear, 2008)Google Scholar
- 9.Bresolin, D., Montanari, A., Sala, P., Sciavicco, G.: Optimal Tableaux for Right Propositional Neighborhood Logic over Linear Orders. In: JELIA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5293, pp. 62–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
- 12.Emerson, E.A.: Temporal and modal logic. In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Formal Models and Semantics, vol. B, pp. 995–1072. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
- 21.Moszkowski, B.: Reasoning about digital circuits. Tech. rep. stan-cs-83-970, Dept. of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (1983)Google Scholar