An Approach for Generalising Symbolic Knowledge

  • Richard Dazeley
  • Byeong-Ho Kang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5360)

Abstract

Many researchers and developers of knowledge based systems (KBS) have been incorporating the notion of context. However, they generally treat context as a static entity, neglecting many connectionists’ work in learning hidden and dynamic contexts, which aids generalization. This paper presents a method that models hidden context within a symbolic domain achieving a level of generalisation. Results indicate that the method can learn the information that experts have difficulty providing by generalising the captured knowledge.

Keywords

hidden context knowledge based systems knowledge representation ripple-down rules situation cognition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Menzies, T.: Assessing Responses to Situated Cognition. In: Tenth Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Catelonia, Spain (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Menzies, T.: Towards Situated Knowledge Acquisition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 49, 867–893 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wille, R.: Restructuring Lattice Theory: An Approach Based on Hierarchies of Concepts. In: Rival, I. (ed.) Ordered Sets: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute held at Banff, Canada, pp. 445–472. D. Reidel Publishing (1981)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kelly, G.A.: The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Norton, New York (1955)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Compton, P., Jansen, R.: Knowledge in Context: a strategy for expert system maintenance. In: Second Australian Joint Artificial Intelligence Conference (AI 1988), vol. 1, pp. 292–306 (1988)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brezillon, P.: Context in Artificial Intelligence: II. Key elements of contexts. Computer and Artificial Intelligence 18(5), 425–446 (1999)MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dazeley, R., Kang, B.: Epistemological Approach to the Process of Practice. Journal of Mind and Machine (in press, 2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gaines, B.: Knowledge Science and Technology: Operationalizing the Enlightenment. In: Proceedings of the 6th Pacific Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, Sydney, Australia, pp. 97–124 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Menzies, T., Debenham, J.: Expert System Maintenance. In: Kent, A., Williams, J.G. (eds.) Encyclopaedia of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 42, pp. 35–54. Marcell Dekker, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beydoun, G.: Incremental Acquisition of Search Control Heuristics, PhD thesis (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Compton, P., Edwards, G., Kang, B.: Ripple Down Rules: Possibilities and Limitations. In: 6th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop (KAW 1991), vol. 1, pp. 6.1–6.18. SRDG publications, Canada (1991)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Compton, P., Kang, B., Preston, P.: Knowledge Acquisition Without Knowledge Analysis. In: Aussenac, N., Boy, G.A., Ganascia, J.-G., Kodratoff, Y., Linster, M., Gaines, B.R. (eds.) EKAW 1993. LNCS, vol. 723, pp. 277–299. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Preston, P., Edwards, G., Compton, P.: A 1600 Rule Expert System Without Knowledge Engineers. In: Moving Towards Expert Systems Globally in the 21st Century (Proceedings of the Second World Congress on Expert Systems 1993), New York, pp. 220–228 (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Preston, P., Edwards, G., Compton, P.: A 2000 Rule Expert System Without a Knowledge Engineer. In: Proceedings of the 8th AAAI-Sponsored Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Banff, Canada, pp. 17.1–17.10 (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kang, B.: Validating Knowledge Acquisition: Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules, PhD thesis (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kang, B.H., Compton, P., Preston, P.: Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules: Evaluation and Possibilities. In: The 9th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems Workshop, SRDG Publications, Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Banff, Canada (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quinlan, J.R.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blake, C.L., Merz, C.J.: UCI Repository of machine learning databases, University of California, Irvine, Dept. of Information and Computer Sciences (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Dazeley
    • 1
  • Byeong-Ho Kang
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Information Technology and Mathematical SciencesUniversity of BallaratBallaratAustralia
  2. 2.School of Computing and Information SystemsUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations