PowerPoint Multimedia Presentations in Computer Science Education: What Do Users Need?

  • Elke I. Reuss
  • Beat Signer
  • Moira C. Norrie
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5298)


PowerPoint is one of the most frequently used tools to present multimedia for educational purposes. Nevertheless, little is known about the users’ needs when using PowerPoint during lecturing. Our study focused on the presenter’s needs in this context of use. We interviewed nine university lecturers from the computer science department by means of a questionnaire. The results show that users require features that are not yet realised with PowerPoint. For example, the control and use of other media should be adequately integrated. Or the navigation within the slide collection should be improved to better meet the users’ needs. Based on our findings, we outline required system features and suggest solutions in form of a prototype.


Multimedia Presentations in Education User Centred Design Interactive Paper 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Parker, I.: Absolute PowerPoint: Can a software package edit your thoughts? The New Yorker (2001) (accessed March 6, 2008), http://nbc-links.com/miscellaneous/AbsolutePPT.pdf
  2. 2.
    Bartsch, R.A., Cobern, K.M.: Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers & Education 41(1), 77–86 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Susskind, J.E.: Limits of PowerPoint’s Power: Enhancing students’ self-efficacy and attitudes but not their behavior. Computers & Education 50(4), 1228–1239 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Craig, R., Amernic, J.: PowerPoint Presentation Technology and the Dynamics of Teaching. Innov. High Educ. 31, 147–160 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holzinger, A., Kickmeier-Rust, M., Albert, D.: Dynamic Media in Computer Science Education; Content Complexity and Learning Performance: Is Less More? Educational Technology & Society 11(1), 279–290 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Golub, E.: Handwritten Slides on a TabletPC in a Discrete Mathematics Course. In: Proc. of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 51–55 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anderson, R., Simon, B., Wolfman, S.A., VanDeGrift, T., Yasuhara, K.: Experiences with a tablet PC based lecture presentation system in computer science courses. In: Proc. of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 56–60 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderson, R.J., Hoyer, C., Wolfman, S.A., Anderson, R.: A study of digital ink in lecture presentation. In: Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria, pp. 567–574 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tufte, E.: The Cognitive Style of Power Point. Graphics Press (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holman, D., et al.: Fly: An Organic Presentation Tool. In: Work in Progress Contribution to CHI 2006, pp. 863–868 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Good, L., Bederson, B.: Zoomable User Interfaces as a Medium for Slide Show Presentations. Information Visualization 1(1), 35–49 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Norrie, M.C., Signer, B., Weibel, N.: General Framework for the Rapid Development of Interactive Paper Applications. In: CoPADD 2006, 1st International Workshop on Collaborating over Paper and Digital Documents, Banff, Canada, pp. 9–12 (November 2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Signer, B.: Fundamental Concepts for Interactive Paper and Cross-Media Information Spaces. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich, Dissertation ETH No. 16218 (May 2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anoto, A.B.: http://www.anoto.com
  15. 15.
    Signer, B., Norrie, M.C.: PaperPoint: A Paper-Based Presentation and Interactive Paper Prototyping Tool. In: Proceedings of TEI 2007, First International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, Baton Rouge, USA, pp. 57–64 (February 2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Chestnut Hill (1993)MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holtzblatt, K., Burns Wendell, J., Wood, S.: Rapid Contextual Design. A How-To Guide to Key Techniques for User-Centered Design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Birnholtz, J.: Back to School: Design Principles for Improving Webcast Interactivity From Face-to-Face Classroom Observation, DIS, 311–319 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu, Q., Kimber, D., Zhao, F., Huang, J.: Framework for effective use of multiple displays. In: Proceedings of SPIE Int. Symposium ITCom on Multimedia Systems and Applications VIII (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elke I. Reuss
    • 1
  • Beat Signer
    • 1
  • Moira C. Norrie
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Information SystemsETH ZurichZurich

Personalised recommendations