Advertisement

McMillan’s Complete Prefix for Contextual Nets

  • Paolo Baldan
  • Andrea Corradini
  • Barbara König
  • Stefan Schwoon
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5100)

Abstract

In a seminal paper, McMillan proposed a technique for constructing a finite complete prefix of the unfolding of bounded (i.e., finite-state) Petri nets, which can be used for verification purposes. Contextual nets are a generalisation of Petri nets suited to model systems with read-only access to resources. When working with contextual nets, a finite complete prefix can be obtained by applying McMillan’s construction to a suitable encoding of the contextual net into an ordinary net. However, it has been observed that if the unfolding is itself a contextual net, then the complete prefix can be significantly smaller than the one obtained with the above technique. A construction for generating such a contextual complete prefix has been proposed for a special class of nets, called read-persistent. In this paper, we propose an algorithm that works for arbitrary semi-weighted, bounded contextual nets. The construction explicitly takes into account the fact that, unlike in ordinary or read-persistent nets, an event can have several different histories in general contextual net computations.

Keywords

Petri nets read arcs unfolding complete finite prefix verification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Baldan, P., Corradini, A., König, B.: Verifying finite-state graph grammars: an unfolding-based approach. In: Gardner, P., Yoshida, N. (eds.) CONCUR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3170, pp. 83–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baldan, P., Corradini, A., Montanari, U.: An event structure semantics for P/T contextual nets: asymmetric event structures. In: Nivat, M. (ed.) FOSSACS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1378, pp. 63–80. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baldan, P., Corradini, A., Montanari, U.: Contextual Petri nets, asymmetric event structures and processes. Information and Computation 171(1), 1–49 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christensen, S., Hansen, N.D.: Coloured Petri nets extended with place capacities, test arcs and inhibitor arcs. In: Ajmone Marsan, M. (ed.) ICATPN 1993. LNCS, vol. 691, pp. 186–205. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Engelfriet, J.: Branching processes of Petri nets. Acta Informatica 28, 575–591 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Esparza, J., Römer, S., Vogler, W.: An improvement of McMillan’s unfolding algorithm. Formal Methods in System Design 20, 285–310 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Janicki, R., Koutny, M.: Invariant semantics of nets with inhibitor arcs. In: Groote, J.F., Baeten, J.C.M. (eds.) CONCUR 1991. LNCS, vol. 527. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Janicki, R., Koutny, M.: Semantics of inhibitor nets. Information and Computation 123, 1–16 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Langerak, R.: Transformation and Semantics for LOTOS. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Twente (1992)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McMillan, K.L.: Using unfoldings to avoid the state explosion problem in the verification of asynchronous circuits. In: Probst, D.K., von Bochmann, G. (eds.) CAV 1992. LNCS, vol. 663, pp. 164–174. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McMillan, K.L.: Symbolic Model Checking. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1993)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Montanari, U., Rossi, F.: Contextual occurrence nets and concurrent constraint programming. In: Ehrig, H., Schneider, H.-J. (eds.) Dagstuhl Seminar 1993. LNCS, vol. 776. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Montanari, U., Rossi, F.: Contextual nets. Acta Informatica 32(6), 545–596 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nielsen, M., Plotkin, G., Winskel, G.: Petri Nets, event structures and domains, Part 1. Theoretical Computer Science 13, 85–108 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pinna, G.M., Poigné, A.: On the nature of events: another perspective in concurrency. Theoretical Computer Science 138(2), 425–454 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ristori, G.: Modelling Systems with Shared Resources via Petri Nets. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Pisa (1994)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vogler, W.: Efficiency of asynchronous systems and read arcs in Petri nets. In: Degano, P., Gorrieri, R., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A. (eds.) ICALP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1256, pp. 538–548. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vogler, W., Semenov, A., Yakovlev, A.: Unfolding and finite prefix for nets with read arcs. In: Sangiorgi, D., de Simone, R. (eds.) CONCUR 1998. LNCS, vol. 1466, pp. 501–516. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Winkowski, J.: Reachability in contextual nets. Fundamenta Informaticae 51(1), 235–250 (2002)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Baldan
    • 1
  • Andrea Corradini
    • 2
  • Barbara König
    • 3
  • Stefan Schwoon
    • 4
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Matematica Pura e ApplicataUniversità di PadovaPaduaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversità di PisaPisaItaly
  3. 3.Abteilung für Informatik und Angewandte KognitionswissenschaftUniversität Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany
  4. 4.Institut für Informatik (I7)Technische Universität MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations