The somatosensory evoked response detection using coherence and different stimulation frequencies

  • Danilo Barbosa Melges
  • A. F. C. Infantosi
  • A. M. F. L. Miranda de Sá
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 22)

Abstract

This work aims at investigating the effects of the stimulation frequency in the somatosensory evoked response detection using coherence. Electroencephalographic (EEG) signals during somatosensory stimulation were collected from thirty-seven adult volunteers without history of neurological pathology using the 10–20 International System. All leads were referenced to the earlobe average. The stimulation was carried out throughout current pulses (200 µs width) applied to the right posterior tibial nerve (motor threshold intensity level) at the rates of 2, 5, 7 and 9 Hz (fe). The response detection was based on rejecting the null hypothesis of response absence (M = 500 epochs and significance level α = 0.05). The percentages of volunteers for whom the response was detected, for the frequency range from 2 and 100 Hz, were calculated for the four fe-values. Only the derivations Cz, C4, Pz and P4 presented frequencies with detection rates greater than 60%. In order to compare the effects of stimulation frequency in the percentage of detection, the proportion test was applied to the averaged detection rate of all frequencies from 2 to 100 Hz. The averaged detection rates for the four fe were compared two by two for each derivation, Cz, C4, Pz and P4. No statistically significant difference was found between the averaged detection rates in none of the considered derivations. This indicates that the higher stimulus frequency (9 Hz) can be used in order to obtain a reduction in the time of both averaging and response detection for a fixed-value M of EEG epochs.

Keywords

Somatosensory Evoked Potential Coherence stimulus frequency 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Miranda de Sá AMFL, Infantosi AFC, Simpson DM. (2002) Coherence between one random and one periodic signal for measuring the strength of responses in the EEG during sensory stimulation. Med Biol Eng Comput 40: 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Infantosi AFC, Melges DB, Tierra-Criollo CJ. (2006) Use of magnitude-squared coherence to identify the maximum driving response band of the somatosensory evoked potential. Braz J Med Biol Res 39:1593–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miranda de Sá AMFL. (2004) A note on the sampling distribution of coherence estimate for the detection of periodic signals. IEEE Signal Process Lett 11(3): 323–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miranda de Sá AMFL and Infantosi AFC. (2007) Measuring the synchronism in the ongoing Electroencephalogram during intermittent stimulation — a partial coherence-based approach. Med Biol Eng Comput 47(7): 443–452.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moore D (2005) A Estatística Básica e sua prática. LTC Editora, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manzano GM, De Navarro JM, Nóbrega JAM, Novo NF, Juliano Y. (1995) Shorty latency median nerve somatosensory evoked potential (SEP): increase in stimulation frequency from 3 to 30 Hz. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96: 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Araki, A, Takada A, Yasuhara A, Kobayashi Y. (1999) The effects of stimulus rates on the amplitude of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials: the developmental change. Brain and development 21:118–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gobbelé R, Buchner H, Scherg M, Curio G. (1999) Stability of highfrequency (600 Hz) components in human somatosensory evoked potentials under variation of stimulus rate — evidence for a thalamic origin. Clin Neurophysiol 110:1659–1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danilo Barbosa Melges
    • 1
  • A. F. C. Infantosi
    • 1
  • A. M. F. L. Miranda de Sá
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering Program (UFRJ)Cidade UniversitáriaRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations