Tremor control during movement of the upper limb using artificial neural networks

  • G. Severini
  • S. Conforto
  • I. Bernabucci
  • M. Schmid
  • T. D’Alessio
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 22)

Abstract

This work aims at introducing a novel way of controlling tremor in ballistic planar movements of the upper limb using Artificial Neural Networks. The idea is that of designing a smart controller based on Artificial Neural Networks, able to drive adaptively an electrical stimulator device in order to promote the voluntary movement and to deploy the tremor simultaneously. This paper would like to present the preliminary results of the feasibility study carried on by studying the neural controller when dealing with simulated movements affected by Parkinson’s action tremor. A biomechanical arm model with two pairs of muscles modelled using Hill’s lump circuit has been developed in order to simulate ballistic planar movement of the upper limb. The tremor has been simulated by adding noise in frequency range of Parkinson’s action tremor to the torques at the joints. The neural activations that generate this noise have been found using an Artificial Neural Network trained by using a Reinforcement Learning paradigm. A Noise-Box has been developed in order to combine the neural activations of the noise at the joints with those of a correct movement, thus obtaining the neural activations of a voluntary movement affected by tremor. The Noise-Box also calculates the additive neural activations the controller has to provide to the biomechanical arm model in order to correct the tremor during the movement. Finally the controller has been implemented using a Feed Forward Artificial Neural Network receiving as inputs only the neural activations of a tremorous movement and providing as output the correcting activations. This Neural Network has been trained with a supervised paradigm using the information given by the Noise-Box. Various tests have been performed with different noise amplitudes.

Keywords

Tremor Neural Networks Reinforcement Hill’s model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

VI. References

  1. 1.
    R.R. Tasker, “Deep Brain Stimulation is preferable to thalamotomy for tremor supprerssion” Surgical Neurology, 1998, 49: 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Rocon, M. Ruiz, J.L. Pons, “Rehabilitation Robotics: A wearable exoskeleton for tremor assesment and suppression”, and Automation, 2005, 2271–2276Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Prochazka, J. Elek, M. Javidan, “Attenuation of Pathological tremor by functional electrical stimulation I: Method”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 1992, Vol 20, 205–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Zhang, W. T. Ang, “Tremor suppression of elbow joint via Functional Electrical Stimulation: A simulation study”, 2006, International Conference on Automation Science and EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Wentzelburger et al, “Kinetic tremor in a reach-to-grasp movement in Parkinson’s disease”, Movement Disorders, 2000, 6: 1084–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. Bernabucci, “Model of the motor control of the upper limb”, Phd Thesis, 2006Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.Y. Scovil, J.L. Ronsky, “Sensitivity of a Hill-based muscle model to perturbations in model parameter”, 2006, Journal of Biomechanics, Vol 39, 2055–2063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K.D. Pfann, A.S. Buvhmann, “Control of movement distance in Parkinson’s Disease”, 2001, Movements Disorders, Vol 16, 1048–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.S. Sutton, A.G. Barto, “Reinforcement learning, an introduction”, 1998Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Severini
    • 1
  • S. Conforto
    • 1
  • I. Bernabucci
    • 1
  • M. Schmid
    • 1
  • T. D’Alessio
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Elettronica ApplicataUniversità degli studi Roma TreRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations