Ontology Development in Collaborative Networks as a Process of Social Construction of Meaning

  • Carla Pereira
  • António Lucas Soares
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5333)

Abstract

This paper proposes a new method to support the collaborative construction of semantic artifacts in an inter-organizational context. It aims at being applied, in particular, in the early phases of ontology development. We share the view that that the development of semantic artifacts in collaborative networks of organizations should be based on a continuous construction of meaning, rather than pursuing the delivery of highly formalized accounts of domains. For that, our research is directed to the application of cognitive semantics results, specifically by developing and extending the Conceptual Blending Theory to cope with the socio-cognitive aspects of inter-organizational ontology development. Besides the outline of the method, we analyze the main problems and gaps in current ontology development methods regarding collaboration and negotiation in early development phases.

Keywords

conceptualization social construction of meaning ontology development collaborative networks conceptual blending 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cahier, J.-P., Zaher, L.H., Leboeuf, J.-P., Guittard, C.: Experimentation of a socially constructed “Topic Map” by the OSS community. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2005 workshop on Knowledge Management and Ontology Management (KMOM), Edimbourg (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Evans, V., Green, M.: Cognitive Linguistics: an introduction. Edinburgh University Press (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fauconnier, G., Turner, M.: Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science 22(2), 133–187 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corcho, O., Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies: where is their meeting point? Data Knowl. Eng. 46(1), 41–64 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Overview and analysis of methodologies for building ontologies. The Knowledge Engineering Review 12(2), 129–156 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Sierra, J., Sierra, A.: Building a chemical ontology using methontology and the ontology design environment. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(1), 37–46 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gasevic, D., Djuric, D., Devedzic, V.: Model Driven Architecture and Ontology Development. Springer, Berlin (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Devedzic, V.: Understanding Ontological Engineering. Communications of the ACM 45(4), 136–144 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Moor, A., Leenheer, P.D., Meersman, R.: Dogma-mess: A meaning evolution support system for interorganizational ontology engineering. In: Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2006), Aalborg, Denmark, July 17-21 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kotis, K., Vouros, G.: Human-centered ontology engineering: The HCOME methodology. Knowledge and Information Systems 10(1), 109–131 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Staab, S., Studer, R., Schnurr, H., Sure, Y.: Knowledge processes and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(1), 26–34 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sure, Y.: A tool-supported methodology for ontology-based knowledge management. In: ISMIS 2002, Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gómez-Gauchía, H., Díaz-Agudo, B., González-Calero, P.: Towards a pragmatic methodology to build lightweight ontologies: a case study. In: Procs. of the IADIS International Conference, Applied Computing 2004, Lisboa, Portugal (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gómez-Gauchía, H., Díaz-Agudo, B., González-Calero, P.: Two-layered approach to knowledge representation using conceptual maps and description logics. In: Cañas, A.J., Novak, J.D., González, F.M. (eds.) Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology, Proc. of the First Int. Conference on Concept Mapping (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pinto, S., Staab, S., Sure, Y., Tempich, C.: Ontoedit empowering swap: a case study in supporting distributed, loosely-controlled and evolving engineering of ontologies (diligent). In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) ESWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3053. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aschoff, F.: Knowledge mediation: A procedure for the cooperative construction of domain ontologies. Master’s thesis, University of Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhao, G.: AKEM: an ontology engineering methodology in FF POIROT. Deliverable 6.8 of FF POIROT project (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.: Collaborative networks in industry – Trends and foundations. In: Proc. of DET 2006 - 3rd International CIRP Conference in Digital Enterprise Technology. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carla Pereira
    • 1
    • 2
  • António Lucas Soares
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores do Porto (INESC Porto)PortoPortugal
  2. 2.Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão de FelgueirasInstituto Politécnico do PortoFelgueirasPortugal
  3. 3.Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations