Methodological Approach to Determine Appropriately Annotated Resources in Narrow Folksonomies
Folksonomies are community managed vocabularies, and do not limit end users to employ a strict terminology in their annotating activities. Users are free to create and use whatever tag they like. Folksonomies have also been criticized to produce low quality meta data due to reduced quality control. In the case of narrow folksonomies where resources are evaluated by only one person there is no certainty that the resources are appropriately annotated. In this paper, we suggest a three-phase iterative approach to determine the properties, expressed in terms of tag ambiguity, of resources appropriately annotated in a narrow folksonomy to improve information retrieval. We also show brief results of the first steps of that approach in a case study involving a narrow folksonomy.
Keywordsnarrow folksonomies quality tags information retrieval
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Damme, C.V., Hepp, M., Coenen, T.: Quality metrics for tags of broad folksonomies. In: Proceedings of the third International Conference on Semantic Systems (I-Semantics), J.UCS (2008) (forthcoming)Google Scholar
- 3.Dorrow, B.: A Graph Model for Words and their Meanings. Phd thesis, University of Stuttgart (Faculty of filosophy and history), Germany (2006)Google Scholar
- 4.Falkenberg, E.D.: Frisco: A framework of information system concepts. Technical report, IFIP WG 8.1 Task Group (1998)Google Scholar
- 6.Guy, M., Tonkin, E.: Tidying up tags. D-Lib Magazine (2006)Google Scholar
- 9.Quintarelli, E.: Folksonomies: power to the people (2005)Google Scholar
- 10.Schmitz, P.: Inducing ontology from flickr tags. In: Proceedings of Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW 2006, Edinburgh, UK (2006)Google Scholar