Advertisement

Applications of the ACGT Master Ontology on Cancer

  • Mathias Brochhausen
  • Gabriele Weiler
  • Luis Martín
  • Cristian Cocos
  • Holger Stenzhorn
  • Norbert Graf
  • Martin Dörr
  • Manolis Tsiknakis
  • Barry Smith
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5333)

Abstract

In this paper we present applications of the ACGT Master Ontology (MO) which is a new terminology resource for a transnational network providing data exchange in oncology, emphasizing the integration of both clinical and molecular data. The development of a new ontology was necessary due to problems with existing biomedical ontologies in oncology. The ACGT MO is a test case for the application of best practices in ontology development. This paper provides an overview of the application of the ontology within the ACGT project thus far.

Keywords

biomedical ontology clinical trials mediation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Buetow, K.H.: Cyberinfrastructure: Empowering a Third Way, Biomedical Research. Science Magazine 308(5723), 821–824 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tsiknakis, M., Brochhausen, M., Nabrzyski, J., Pucaski, J., Potamias, G., Desmedt, C., Kafetzopoulos, D.: A semantic grid infrastructure enabling integrated access and analysis of multilevel biomedical data in support of post-genomic clinical trials on Cancer. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Special issue on Bio-Grids 12(2), 205–217 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cali, A.: Reasoning in Data Integration Systems: Why LAV and GAV Are Siblings. In: Zhong, N., Raś, Z.W., Tsumoto, S., Suzuki, E. (eds.) ISMIS 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2871, pp. 562–571. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Tsiknakis, M., et al.: Building a European Biomedical Grid on Cancer, Challenges and Opportunities of HealthGrids. In: Procs. of the HealthGrid 2006 conference, Valencia, Spain, pp. 247–258 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Ceusters, W., Smith, B., Goldberg, L.: A Terminological and Ontological Analysis of the NCI Thesaurus. Methods of Information in Medicine 44, 213–220 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Smith, B., Brochhausen, M.: Establishing and Harmonizing Ontologies in an Interdisciplinary Health Care and Clinical Research Environment. In: Blobel, B., Pharow, P., Nerlich, M. (eds.) eHealth: Combining Health Telematics, Telemedicine, Biomedical Engineering and Bioinformatics to the Edge, pp. 219–234. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dörr, M.: The CIDOC CRM - An Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability of Metadata. AI Magazine 24(3)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Smith, B., Ceusters, W., Klagges, B., Kohler, J., Kumar, A., Lomax, J., Mungall, C.J., Neuhaus, F., Rector, A., Rosse, C.: Relations in Biomedical Ontologies. Genome Biology 6, R46 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    DeVita Jr., V.T., Hellman, S., Rosenberg, S.A. (eds.): Cancer. Principles and Practice of Oncology, 6th edn., Philadelphia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schulz, W.A.: Molecular Biology of Human Cancers. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wittekind, C., Meyer, H.J., Bootz, F.: TNM, Klassifikation maligner Tumoren. Springer, Berlin (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Grenon, P., Smith, B., Goldberg, L.: Biodynamic Ontology: Applying BFO in the Biomedical Domain. In: Pisanelli, D.M. (ed.) Ontologies in Medicine, pp. 20–38. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rector, A.L., Zanstra, P.E., Solomon, W.D., Rogers, J.E., Baud, R., et al.: Reconciling Users Needs and Formal Requirements: Issues in developing Re-Usable Ontology for Medicine. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in BioMedicine 2(4), 229–242 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lassila, O., McGuinness, D.: The role of frame-based representation on the Semantic Web, Technical Report KSL- 01-02, Knowledge System Laborartory. Stanford University, Stanford (2001)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering. Springer, London (2004)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    Ceusters, W., Spackman, K.A., Smith, B.: Would SOMED CT benefit from Realism-Based Ontology Evolution? In: American Medical Informatics Association 2007 Annual Symposium Proceedings, Biomedical and Health Informatics: From Foundations to Applications to Policy, Chicago, IL, pp. 105–109 (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cimino, J.J.: Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the Twenty-First Century. Methods Inf. Med. 37(4–5), 394–403 (1998)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    SPARQL Query Language for RDF, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query
  30. 30.
    The OGSA-DAI Project, http://www.ogsadai.org.uk
  31. 31.
    Martín, L., Bonsma, E., Anguita, A., Vrijnsen, J., García-Remesal, M., Crespo, J., Tsiknakis, M., Maojo, V.: Data Access and Management in ACGT: Tools to Solve Syntactic and Semantic Heterogeneities Between Clinical and Image Databases. In: Advances in Conceptual Modeling – Foundations and Applications. LNCS, pp. 24–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weiler, G., Brochhausen, M., Graf, N., Hoppe, A., Schera, F., Kiefer, S.: Ontology Based Data Management Systems for post-genomic clinical Trials within an European Grid Infrastructure for Cancer Research. In: Proc. of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Lyon, France, August 23-26, 2007, pp. 6434–6437 (2007)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Andrews, J.E., Richesson, R.L., Krischer, J.: Variation of SNOMED CT coding of clinical research concepts among coding experts. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007 14(4), 497–506 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chiang, M.F., Hwang, J.C., Yu, A.C., Casper, D.S., Cimino, J.J., Starren, J.: Reliability of SNOMED-CT coding by three physicians using two terminology browsers. In: AMIA 2006 Symposium Proceedings, pp. 131–135 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathias Brochhausen
    • 1
  • Gabriele Weiler
    • 2
  • Luis Martín
    • 3
  • Cristian Cocos
    • 1
  • Holger Stenzhorn
    • 4
  • Norbert Graf
    • 5
  • Martin Dörr
    • 6
  • Manolis Tsiknakis
    • 6
  • Barry Smith
    • 1
    • 7
  1. 1.IFOMISSaarland UniversitySaarbrückenGermany
  2. 2.Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical EngineeringSt. IngbertGermany
  3. 3.Biomedical Informatics Group, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, School of Computer ScienceUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain
  4. 4.Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical InformaticsUniversity Medical CenterFreiburgGermany
  5. 5.Paediatric Haematology and OncologySaarland University HospitalHomburgGermany
  6. 6.Institute of Computer ScienceFoundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH)HeraklionGreece
  7. 7.Department of Philosophy and New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life SciencesUniversity at BuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations