Ontology Matching Supported by Query Answering in a P2P System

  • François-Élie Calvier
  • Chantal Reynaud
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5332)


In this article we propose methods to automate the extraction of alignments or mappings between ontologies by using query answering in the peer data management system (PDMS) SomeRDFS which uses a data model based on RDF(S). Query answering is composed of a rewriting and an evaluation phase. We show that query answering provides information that offer automated support for discovering new mappings. It is used to generate either mapping shortcuts corresponding to mapping compositions or mappings which can not be inferred from the network but yet relevant. The strategy followed by a peer and filtering criteria defined by the administrator of a peer are used to select the most relevant mappings to be represented.


ontology matching peer-to-peer data management systems 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Adjiman, P., Goasdoué, F., Rousset, M.C.: SomeRDFS in the semantic web. Journal on Data Semantics, 158–181 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rahm, E., Bernstein, P.A.: A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. VLDB J. 10(4), 334–350 (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, M.: Ontology mapping: the state of the art. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18, 1–31 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Halevy, Y., Ives, G., Suciu, D., Tatarinov, I.: Schema mediation for large-scale semantic data sharing. The VLDB Journal 14(1), 68–83 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tatarinov, I., Ives, Z.G., Madhavan, J., Halevy, A.Y., Suciu, D., Dalvi, N.N., Dong, X., Kadiyska, Y., Miklau, G., Mork, P.: The piazza peer data management project. SIGMOD Record 32(3), 47–52 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herschel, S., Heese, R.: Humboldt discoverer: A semantic p2p index for pdms. In: DISWeb 2005 (June 2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S.: H-match: an algorithm for dynamically matching ontologies in peer-based systems. In: SWDB 2003, Berlin, Germany (September 2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bernstein, P.A., Green, T.J., Melnik, S., Nash, A.: Implementing mapping composition. In: VLDB, pp. 55–66 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Besana, P., Robertson, D.: How service choreography statistics reduce the ontology mapping problem. In: ISWC/ASWC, pp. 44–57 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aberer, K., Cudré-Mauroux, P., Hauswirth, M.: The chatty web: emergent semantics through gossiping. In: WWW, pp. 197–206 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reynaud, C., Safar, B.: When usual structural alignment techniques don’t apply. In: The ISWC 2006 workshop on Ontology matching (OM 2006) (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • François-Élie Calvier
    • 1
  • Chantal Reynaud
    • 1
  1. 1.LRI, Univ Paris-Sud & INRIA Saclay - Île-de-FranceOrsay CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations