ECCV 2008: Computer Vision – ECCV 2008 pp 238-250 | Cite as

Segmenting Fiber Bundles in Diffusion Tensor Images

  • Alvina Goh
  • René Vidal
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5304)

Abstract

We consider the problem of segmenting fiber bundles in diffusion tensor images. We cast this problem as a manifold clustering problem in which different fiber bundles correspond to different submanifolds of the space of diffusion tensors. We first learn a local representation of the diffusion tensor data using a generalization of the locally linear embedding (LLE) algorithm from Euclidean to diffusion tensor data. Such a generalization exploits geometric properties of the space of symmetric positive semi-definite matrices, particularly its Riemannian metric. Then, under the assumption that different fiber bundles are physically distinct, we show that the null space of a matrix built from the local representation gives the segmentation of the fiber bundles. Our method is computationally simple, can handle large deformations of the principal direction along the fiber tracts, and performs automatic segmentation without requiring previous fiber tracking. Results on synthetic and real diffusion tensor images are also presented.

Keywords

Corpus Callosum Fiber Bundle Diffusion Tensor Spectral Cluster Locally Linear Embedding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arsigny, V., et al.: Log-Euclidean metrics for fast and simple calculus on diffusion tensors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 56, 411–421 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fletcher, P.T., Joshi, S.: Riemannian geometry for the statistical analysis of diffusion tensor data. Signal Processing 87 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pennec, X., Fillard, P., Ayache, N.: A Riemannian framework for tensor computing. International Journal of Computer Vision 66, 41–46 (2006)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, Z., Vemuri, B.C.: DTI segmentation using an information theoretic tensor dissimilarity measure. IEEE Trans. on Med. Imag. 24, 1267–1277 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kindlmann, G., et al.: Geodesic-loxodromes for diffusion tensor interpolation and difference measurement. In: Ayache, N., Ourselin, S., Maeder, A. (eds.) MICCAI 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4791, pp. 1–9. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhukov, L., et al.: Level set segmentation and modeling of DT-MRI human brain data. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 125–133 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ding, Z., et al.: Classification and quantification of neuronal fiber pathways using diffusion tensor MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 49, 716–721 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brun, A., et al.: Clustering fiber tracts using normalized cuts. In: Barillot, C., Haynor, D.R., Hellier, P. (eds.) MICCAI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3216, pp. 368–375. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Friman, O., Farneback, G., Westin, C.F.: A Bayesian approach for stochastic white matter tractography. IEEE Trans. on Med. Imag. 25, 965–978 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Perrin, M., et al.: Fiber tracking in q-ball fields using regularized particle trajectories. In: Information Processing in Medical Imaging (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wiegell, M., et al.: Automatic segmentation of thalamic nuclei from diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage, 391–401 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, Z., Vemuri, B.: Tensor field segmentation using region based active contour model. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 304–315 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jonasson, L., et al.: A level set method for segmentation of the thalamus and its nuclei in DT-MRI. Signal Processing 87, 309–321 (2007)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ziyan, U., Tuch, D., Westin, C.F.: Segmentation of thalamic nuclei from DTI using spectral clustering. In: Larsen, R., Nielsen, M., Sporring, J. (eds.) MICCAI 2006. LNCS, vol. 4191, pp. 807–814. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lenglet, C., et al.: A Riemannian approach to diffusion tensor images segmentation. In: Information Processing in Medical Imaging (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Melonakos, J., et al.: Locally-constrained region-based methods for DW-MRI segmentation. In: MMBIA (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Melonakos, J., et al.: Finsler tractography for white matter connectivity analysis of the cingulum bundle. In: Ayache, N., Ourselin, S., Maeder, A. (eds.) MICCAI 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4791, pp. 36–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Awate, S., et al.: A fuzzy, nonparametric segmentation framework for DTI and MRI analysis. IEEE Trans. on Med. Imag. 26, 1525–1536 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roweis, S., Saul, L.: Think globally, fit locally: Unsupervised learning of low dimensional manifolds. Journal of Machine Learning Research 4, 119–155 (2003)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goh, A., Vidal, R.: Clustering and dimensionality reduction on Riemannian manifolds. In: IEEE CVPR (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goh, A., Vidal, R.: Unsupervised Riemannian clustering of probability density functions. In: ECML PKDD (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wassermann, D., et al.: Diffusion maps clustering for magnetic resonance Q-Ball imaging segmentation. International Journal in Biomedical Imaging (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Haro, G., Lenglet, C., Sapiro, G., Thompson, P.M.: On the non-uniform complexity of brain connectivity. In: ISBI, pp. 887–890 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Belkin, M., Niyogi, P.: Laplacian eigenmaps and spectral techniques for embedding and clustering. Neural Information Processing Systems, 585–591 (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Donoho, D., Grimes, C.: Hessian eigenmaps: Locally linear embedding techniques for high-dimensional data. PNAS 100, 5591–5596 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tenenbaum, J.B., de Silva, V., Langford, J.C.: A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science 290, 2319–2323 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    von Luxburg, U.: A tutorial on spectral clustering. Stat. and Computing 17 (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Horn, R., Johnson, C.: Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Toussaint, N., et al.: MedINRIA: Medical image navigation and research tool by INRIA. In: Proc. of MICCAI 2007 Workshop on Interaction in med. image analysis and vis. (2007), http://www-sop.inria.fr/asclepios/software/MedINRIA
  30. 30.
    Weinstein, D., et al.: Tensorlines: Advection-diffusion based propagation through diffusion tensor fields. In: IEEE Visualization, San Francisco, pp. 249–254 (1999)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xie, S., et al.: Evaluation of bilateral cingulum with tractography in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroreport 16, 1275–1278 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Foong, J., et al.: Investigating regional white matter in schizophrenia using diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroreport 13, 333–336 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Alexander, A., et al.: Diffusion tensor imaging of the corpus callosum in autism. Neuroimage 34, 61–73 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alvina Goh
    • 1
  • René Vidal
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Imaging ScienceJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations